Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for W F Moss Scenic Reserve Picnic Area.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
W F Moss Scenic Reserve Picnic Area
Valid Reviews
47 Valid Reviews
The W F Moss Scenic Reserve Picnic Area experience has a total of 58 reviews. There are 47 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 11 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 47 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 9 |
|
19% |
| 9/10 | 8 |
|
17% |
| 8/10 | 13 |
|
28% |
| 7/10 | 6 |
|
13% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
6% |
| 5/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 5 |
|
11% |
73.19% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the W F Moss Scenic Reserve Picnic Area valid reviews is 73.19% and is based on 47 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
4 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 47 valid reviews, the experience has 4 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 4 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 9/10 | 1 |
|
25% |
| 8/10 | 2 |
|
50% |
| 7/10 | 1 |
|
25% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
80.00% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the W F Moss Scenic Reserve Picnic Area face-to-face reviews is 80.00% and is based on 4 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
66.21%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rodri | 3/10 | 168 days | 62% |
| Martin | 1/10 | 198 days | 46% |
| McLean | 8/10 | 471 days | 100% |
| Peschinka | 5/10 | 471 days | 78% |
| Ray | 1/10 | 624 days | 36% |
| Ben | 10/10 | 868 days | 66% |
| Bart | 1/10 | 868 days | 27% |
| Lissy | 9/10 | 868 days | 66% |
| Konrad | 8/10 | 899 days | 61% |
| Charlotte | 7/10 | 899 days | 58% |
| Lucas M | 1/10 | 960 days | 22% |
| Adele | 7/10 | 1113 days | 36% |
| Dani | 10/10 | 1143 days | 36% |
| Eden Moss | 10/10 | 1174 days | 34% |
| Sophie Arogundade | 8/10 | 1174 days | 33% |
| Laura | 7/10 | 1174 days | 31% |
| Jake | 1/10 | 1659 days | 2% |
| Kaylan | 9/10 | 1963 days | 5% |
| Its Me | 10/10 | 2024 days | 5% |
| Rebecca | 10/10 | 2024 days | 5% |
| Mike Howe | 6/10 | 2116 days | 4% |
| Jack Moxon | 6/10 | 2269 days | 4% |
| Robert Adler | 10/10 | 2269 days | 4% |
| Drew | 10/10 | 2329 days | 4% |
| James F | 8/10 | 2329 days | 4% |
| Wiebke | 8/10 | 2329 days | 4% |
| Peter | 7/10 | 2329 days | 4% |
| Camping crew | 9/10 | 2390 days | 4% |
| Javier Williams | 9/10 | 2390 days | 4% |
| Guilhem | 8/10 | 2663 days | 3% |
| Megan | 10/10 | 2663 days | 3% |
| Sophie Skinner | 10/10 | 2755 days | 3% |
| Matt | 9/10 | 2755 days | 3% |
| Molly | 9/10 | 2755 days | 3% |
| Joseph | 7/10 | 2908 days | 2% |
| Christina | 8/10 | 2939 days | 3% |
| Oceane Imber | 6/10 | 3054 days | 2% |
| deborah cooper | 8/10 | 3364 days | 2% |
| estelle D | 8/10 | 3454 days | 1% |
| Javier Schneider | 5/10 | 3716 days | 1% |
| Goldfinger | 8/10 | 3729 days | 1% |
| Megan | 8/10 | 4089 days | 0% |
| Kathy Hart | 9/10 | 4400 days | 1% |
| mcp hm | 8/10 | 4400 days | 0% |
| Andreas Jung | 8/10 | 4468 days | 0% |
| Fraule-Emmanuelle De Rouqmout | 7/10 | 4484 days | 0% |
| Charles Busnel | 9/10 | 4527 days | 0% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. W F Moss Scenic Reserve Picnic Area does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
9.37% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
76%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.