G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Aoraki / Mt Cook National Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Aoraki / Mt Cook National Park
Valid Reviews
67 Valid Reviews
The Aoraki / Mt Cook National Park experience has a total of 69 reviews. There are 67 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 67 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 28 |
|
42% |
| 9/10 | 21 |
|
31% |
| 8/10 | 8 |
|
12% |
| 7/10 | 5 |
|
7% |
| 6/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
88.36% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Aoraki / Mt Cook National Park valid reviews is 88.36% and is based on 67 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
61 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 67 valid reviews, the experience has 61 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 61 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 26 |
|
43% |
| 9/10 | 19 |
|
31% |
| 8/10 | 8 |
|
13% |
| 7/10 | 5 |
|
8% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
89.18% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Aoraki / Mt Cook National Park face-to-face reviews is 89.18% and is based on 61 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
87.53%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Allen | 4/10 | 2268 days | 92% |
| Gerry Boobis | 6/10 | 2817 days | 90% |
| Tobi Guga | 10/10 | 2883 days | 100% |
| Anna | 10/10 | 2980 days | 93% |
| Claire | 10/10 | 3014 days | 91% |
| Nancy Blindell | 10/10 | 3202 days | 78% |
| Diego Pablos | 10/10 | 3322 days | 70% |
| Anssens Weber Florie Brian | 9/10 | 3334 days | 69% |
| Ixtaso Roncal | 9/10 | 3367 days | 67% |
| Coralie Ambrosino | 7/10 | 3596 days | 48% |
| Tarillon Family | 9/10 | 3599 days | 51% |
| Barthelemy | 9/10 | 3600 days | 51% |
| David McIntosh | 8/10 | 3644 days | 48% |
| Dawn Mulligan | 9/10 | 3650 days | 48% |
| Oliver Andres | 9/10 | 3683 days | 45% |
| Corinna Fallenbuchel | 10/10 | 3684 days | 46% |
| Fanny DeBon | 9/10 | 3697 days | 45% |
| Logan Leduc | 9/10 | 3705 days | 44% |
| Anna Grafenstein | 8/10 | 3939 days | 28% |
| Caroline Hennache | 8/10 | 3942 days | 28% |
| isabel Zander | 10/10 | 3942 days | 28% |
| Calvin Becker | 10/10 | 3942 days | 28% |
| Karen Garvin | 10/10 | 3944 days | 28% |
| Julien Joubert-Gaillard | 7/10 | 3946 days | 26% |
| Marek Heiurich | 10/10 | 3952 days | 28% |
| Linda Wainman | 9/10 | 3971 days | 26% |
| Chris Wainman | 9/10 | 3971 days | 26% |
| Ruud Biemans | 7/10 | 3974 days | 24% |
| Sarah Christman | 8/10 | 3976 days | 26% |
| Stina Hultberg | 10/10 | 3978 days | 26% |
| Sarah | 9/10 | 3982 days | 25% |
| Guillaume | 6/10 | 3983 days | 22% |
| Denise Ewbank | 9/10 | 3989 days | 25% |
| Marius Hoffmann | 8/10 | 3991 days | 25% |
| Ene Pold | 9/10 | 3996 days | 25% |
| Henrik Suefke | 10/10 | 3996 days | 25% |
| G Ballard | 10/10 | 4000 days | 25% |
| F Ballard | 9/10 | 4000 days | 24% |
| Glenda | 10/10 | 4002 days | 24% |
| Timothee Serres | 9/10 | 4004 days | 24% |
| Wouter Bosch | 7/10 | 4015 days | 22% |
| Claire Lieval | 9/10 | 4021 days | 23% |
| Guy David | 10/10 | 4023 days | 23% |
| Sarah Strong | 10/10 | 4026 days | 23% |
| Michael Rohn | 10/10 | 4030 days | 23% |
| Cornelia Stark | 10/10 | 4030 days | 23% |
| Thomas Roche | 9/10 | 4035 days | 22% |
| Marc Greeve | 10/10 | 4041 days | 22% |
| Christin Woelk | 10/10 | 4303 days | 4% |
| Sven Woelk | 10/10 | 4303 days | 4% |
| Audrey Ripoche | 7/10 | 4315 days | 3% |
| Kiki Wykstra | 10/10 | 4327 days | 2% |
| Raquel | 9/10 | 4346 days | 1% |
| Enna Keet | 8/10 | 4351 days | 1% |
| Maxime | 10/10 | 4351 days | 1% |
| Katharina Littlemann | 10/10 | 4351 days | 1% |
| Veronica and Jordi | 9/10 | 4358 days | 0% |
| Fraser Goldsmith | 10/10 | 4363 days | 0% |
| Jeanne Moustier | 10/10 | 4380 days | 33% |
| Mathieu Brias | 8/10 | 4385 days | 33% |
| Natalie Nubler | 3/10 | 4421 days | 18% |
| Stefan and Brigit and Janek | 10/10 | 4421 days | 33% |
| Annie | 9/10 | 4422 days | 33% |
| Jacquemard | 10/10 | 4434 days | 33% |
| Oliver Kalmbach | 8/10 | 4438 days | 33% |
| Karsten Meyer | 5/10 | 4444 days | 25% |
| Kali Lohman | 9/10 | 4445 days | 33% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Aoraki / Mt Cook National Park does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
1.37% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
89%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.