Ranking Score Explained

Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Arthur's Pass National Park.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Nick Morrison's avatar

Nick Morrison

Rankers owner

Arthur's Pass National Park

Valid Reviews

22 Valid Reviews

The Arthur's Pass National Park experience has a total of 22 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 22 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 4
18%
9/10 9
41%
8/10 5
23%
7/10 3
14%
6/10 1
5%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

85.45% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Arthur's Pass National Park valid reviews is 85.45% and is based on 22 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

21 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 22 valid reviews, the experience has 21 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 21 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 3
14%
9/10 9
43%
8/10 5
24%
7/10 3
14%
6/10 1
5%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

84.76% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Arthur's Pass National Park face-to-face reviews is 84.76% and is based on 21 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

86.45%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Face-to-Face Weight Relative Weight
Art Ruisenor 10/10 939 days true 10.63 100%
Stefanie Giese 10/10 984 days 6.95 42%
Elisa Felising 9/10 1325 days true 5.62 20%
Martin Kroek 7/10 1335 days true 5.61 20%
Charlotte 10/10 1637 days true 5.11 12%
Pavel Jarolimek 9/10 1643 days true 5.1 12%
Gloria Hanke 8/10 1645 days true 5.1 12%
Guido Dust 8/10 1645 days true 5.1 12%
Philip Schumann 9/10 1662 days true 5.07 12%
Verena 6/10 1693 days true 5.02 11%
Cameron Tarbotton 9/10 1701 days true 5.0 11%
Angela Neville 7/10 1702 days true 5.0 11%
Alacchi Moustier 9/10 1707 days true 4.99 10%
Mayan Goddat 9/10 1714 days true 4.98 10%
Daniel Naveh 10/10 1714 days true 4.98 10%
Tim Vennewold 7/10 2018 days true 4.48 2%
Paul Liecke 9/10 2033 days true 4.46 2%
Stella Thoben 9/10 2033 days true 4.46 2%
Rob Cadmus 8/10 2034 days true 4.46 2%
Julien Panossian 8/10 2035 days true 4.45 2%
Maxime 9/10 2043 days true 4.44 2%
Liam Day 8/10 2107 days true 4.34 0%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Arthur's Pass National Park does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Final Ranking Score

86%

The final ranking score once rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.