Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Blenheim i-SITE Visitor Information Centre.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at email@example.com. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
31 Valid Reviews
The Blenheim i-SITE Visitor Information Centre experience has a total of 32 reviews. There are 31 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 31 valid reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Blenheim i-SITE Visitor Information Centre valid reviews is 77.42% and is based on 31 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
30 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
Within the 31 valid reviews, the experience has 30 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 30 face-to-face reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Blenheim i-SITE Visitor Information Centre face-to-face reviews is 76.67% and is based on 30 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
|John Romero||10/10||1322 days||4.56||100%|
|Sofie Jebsen||10/10||1914 days||3.4||64%|
|Melvin Spear||10/10||1944 days||3.34||62%|
|Kamil Benes||9/10||1959 days||3.31||61%|
|Jiri Blecha||10/10||1959 days||3.31||61%|
|Katie Stillman||10/10||1998 days||3.23||59%|
|Jan Suoboda||6/10||2145 days||2.44||35%|
|Paolo Cases||10/10||2272 days||2.7||43%|
|Anne Courtenay||10/10||2297 days||2.65||41%|
|Leon Courtney||9/10||2297 days||2.65||41%|
|Bex Hyland||9/10||2299 days||2.64||41%|
|Marvin Koever||7/10||2304 days||2.4||33%|
|Ann Winter||9/10||2308 days||2.63||40%|
|Max Tetzlaff||4/10||2316 days||2.06||23%|
|Piotr Jurkowski||9/10||2334 days||2.58||39%|
|Hendrik Schanz||5/10||2342 days||2.07||23%|
|Sarah Strong||8/10||2342 days||2.43||34%|
|Philip Gosemann||6/10||2342 days||2.12||25%|
|kamil Benes||10/10||2346 days||2.55||38%|
|Moulou Ludonvic||9/10||2354 days||2.54||38%|
|Karina Gratz||1/10||2659 days||1.42||3%|
|Francois Marchar||8/10||2665 days||1.83||16%|
|Gordon and Jenny Subritzky||7/10||2672 days||1.74||13%|
|Christopher Saunders||8/10||2697 days||1.77||14%|
|Anne and John||6/10||2744 days||1.47||5%|
|John Freeman||10/10||2761 days||1.74||13%|
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Blenheim i-SITE Visitor Information Centre does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
The final ranking score once rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at firstname.lastname@example.org.