Ranking Score Explained
Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Motueka i-SITE Visitor Information Centre.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Motueka i-SITE Visitor Information Centre
Valid Reviews
175 Valid Reviews
The Motueka i-SITE Visitor Information Centre experience has a total of 177 reviews. There are 175 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 175 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 68 |
|
39% |
| 9/10 | 38 |
|
22% |
| 8/10 | 37 |
|
21% |
| 7/10 | 12 |
|
7% |
| 6/10 | 9 |
|
5% |
| 5/10 | 6 |
|
3% |
| 4/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
85.71% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Motueka i-SITE Visitor Information Centre valid reviews is 85.71% and is based on 175 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
165 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 175 valid reviews, the experience has 165 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 165 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 59 |
|
36% |
| 9/10 | 38 |
|
23% |
| 8/10 | 37 |
|
22% |
| 7/10 | 12 |
|
7% |
| 6/10 | 9 |
|
5% |
| 5/10 | 6 |
|
4% |
| 4/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
85.39% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Motueka i-SITE Visitor Information Centre face-to-face reviews is 85.39% and is based on 165 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
88.63%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Face-to-Face | Weight | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Weslake | 10/10 | 594 days | 44.77 | 100% | |
| Rebecca Martin | 10/10 | 639 days | 37.95 | 84% | |
| Sophie Ingram | 10/10 | 775 days | 21.23 | 45% | |
| C Flynn | 1/10 | 1034 days | 4.08 | 5% | |
| Josh Lesley-Smith | 10/10 | 1055 days |  |
5.25 | 8% |
| Marc | 9/10 | 1075 days | |
5.06 | 7% |
| Emily Noyd | 9/10 | 1312 days | |
4.63 | 6% |
| Cayla Stanley | 10/10 | 1312 days | |
4.63 | 6% |
| Salvador Jimenez | 10/10 | 1384 days | 4.51 | 6% | |
| Philipp Richter | 6/10 | 1451 days | |
3.64 | 4% |
| Simon Quass | 10/10 | 1452 days | |
4.39 | 6% |
| Sarah Boettcher | 9/10 | 1459 days | |
4.38 | 6% |
| Clement Oudjaovok | 8/10 | 1677 days | |
3.8 | 4% |
| Katherine Halliday | 9/10 | 1679 days | |
4.0 | 5% |
| Daniela Wall | 7/10 | 1679 days | |
3.64 | 4% |
| Katherine Britten | 9/10 | 1682 days | |
3.99 | 5% |
| Megan | 10/10 | 1683 days | |
3.99 | 5% |
| Nina Müller | 9/10 | 1705 days | |
3.96 | 5% |
| Maria Schober | 4/10 | 1706 days | |
3.12 | 3% |
| Marie Schmid | 10/10 | 1711 days | |
3.95 | 5% |
| Charles Aubry | 10/10 | 1712 days | |
3.94 | 5% |
| Arvid Hellquist | 9/10 | 1722 days | |
3.93 | 5% |
| Celia Nowak | 8/10 | 1723 days | |
3.73 | 4% |
| Jiri Blecha | 8/10 | 1724 days | |
3.73 | 4% |
| Marie Weber | 9/10 | 1724 days | |
3.92 | 5% |
| Michal Kamradek | 7/10 | 1759 days | |
3.52 | 4% |
| Dieter Schmees | 9/10 | 1761 days | |
3.86 | 5% |
| Barbara | 9/10 | 1763 days | |
3.86 | 5% |
| Mathieu Brunel | 10/10 | 1763 days | |
3.86 | 5% |
| Thomas and Sonja | 10/10 | 1772 days | |
3.84 | 5% |
| Jam Boggomann | 10/10 | 1776 days | |
3.83 | 5% |
| Pauline Gibson | 10/10 | 1778 days | |
3.83 | 5% |
| Ian Brand | 10/10 | 1780 days | 3.83 | 5% | |
| Antoine Vernay | 8/10 | 1785 days | |
3.63 | 4% |
| Shona MacDonald | 10/10 | 2021 days | |
3.41 | 4% |
| Ane Didriksen | 10/10 | 2021 days | |
3.41 | 4% |
| Iris Anette Berger | 10/10 | 2021 days | |
3.41 | 4% |
| Claudia de Winter | 7/10 | 2026 days | |
3.1 | 3% |
| Cecilia Anderson | 4/10 | 2026 days | |
2.69 | 2% |
| Christina Perez | 8/10 | 2030 days | |
3.23 | 3% |
| Paula Renton | 8/10 | 2031 days | |
3.23 | 3% |
| Maria-Julia Frilaj | 9/10 | 2032 days | |
3.4 | 4% |
| Simon Mehlmann | 9/10 | 2032 days | |
3.4 | 4% |
| Carolin Siegert | 9/10 | 2032 days | |
3.4 | 4% |
| Pavel Jarolimek | 5/10 | 2032 days | |
2.75 | 2% |
| Patricia Erni | 8/10 | 2033 days | |
3.22 | 3% |
| Robert Erni | 8/10 | 2033 days | |
3.22 | 3% |
| Lilli Erni | 8/10 | 2033 days | |
3.22 | 3% |
| Erik Nestlez | 8/10 | 2038 days | |
3.22 | 3% |
| Wouter Vanmoz | 10/10 | 2039 days | |
3.38 | 3% |
| Laure Cops | 9/10 | 2039 days | |
3.38 | 3% |
| Annika Marz | 10/10 | 2047 days | |
3.37 | 3% |
| Julian Zeissler | 8/10 | 2047 days | |
3.2 | 3% |
| Adam | 7/10 | 2047 days | |
3.07 | 3% |
| Petra Albrchtoval | 6/10 | 2047 days | |
2.8 | 2% |
| Lena Hanhart | 7/10 | 2052 days | |
3.06 | 3% |
| Drame Mahmadou | 8/10 | 2052 days | |
3.19 | 3% |
| Joanna Mulcahy | 10/10 | 2052 days | |
3.36 | 3% |
| Helma Druyken | 9/10 | 2053 days | |
3.36 | 3% |
| marcel and conny | 10/10 | 2055 days | 3.36 | 3% | |
| Helen | 10/10 | 2055 days | |
3.36 | 3% |
| Igor | 7/10 | 2055 days | |
3.05 | 3% |
| Ray Bygrave | 9/10 | 2056 days | |
3.35 | 3% |
| Maria Camen Santos Lopez | 10/10 | 2056 days | |
3.35 | 3% |
| Veeh Barrington | 8/10 | 2056 days | |
3.19 | 3% |
| Hirsch Svenja | 10/10 | 2058 days | |
3.35 | 3% |
| Mahr Svenja | 7/10 | 2058 days | |
3.05 | 3% |
| Johanna Kofler | 6/10 | 2058 days | |
2.78 | 2% |
| Kathrin Deichmann | 7/10 | 2060 days | |
3.05 | 3% |
| Konrad Ullmann | 8/10 | 2061 days | |
3.18 | 3% |
| Lukas Lehmeyer | 8/10 | 2061 days | |
3.18 | 3% |
| Mark Hofmann | 9/10 | 2061 days | |
3.35 | 3% |
| Louison Laissus | 10/10 | 2064 days | |
3.34 | 3% |
| Ennico | 10/10 | 2067 days | |
3.34 | 3% |
| Juliane | 7/10 | 2067 days | |
3.04 | 3% |
| Hannah | 7/10 | 2067 days | |
3.04 | 3% |
| Callum | 6/10 | 2067 days | |
2.77 | 2% |
| Barbara | 10/10 | 2067 days | |
3.34 | 3% |
| Marinette | 10/10 | 2067 days | |
3.34 | 3% |
| Larry Majerus | 10/10 | 2068 days | |
3.33 | 3% |
| Jan Majerus | 10/10 | 2068 days | |
3.33 | 3% |
| Philip Donachie | 10/10 | 2071 days | |
3.33 | 3% |
| Luisa Bach | 10/10 | 2071 days | |
3.33 | 3% |
| Karel | 10/10 | 2071 days | |
3.33 | 3% |
| Phillip | 8/10 | 2073 days | |
3.16 | 3% |
| Libby | 5/10 | 2076 days | |
2.69 | 2% |
| Colin Billington | 5/10 | 2077 days | |
2.69 | 2% |
| Gassat | 10/10 | 2077 days | |
3.32 | 3% |
| Janis Gallois | 8/10 | 2078 days | |
3.15 | 3% |
| Andreas Jung | 6/10 | 2079 days | |
2.75 | 2% |
| Francisco Pablo Miguel | 8/10 | 2080 days | |
3.15 | 3% |
| Constanza Salas | 10/10 | 2088 days | |
3.3 | 3% |
| Jesse Flynn | 8/10 | 2090 days | |
3.13 | 3% |
| Andrea Hiemer | 10/10 | 2090 days | |
3.3 | 3% |
| Bella Danaher | 9/10 | 2092 days | |
3.29 | 3% |
| Daniel Danamer | 10/10 | 2092 days | |
3.29 | 3% |
| Christina Habranke | 10/10 | 2095 days | |
3.29 | 3% |
| Julia Bonisch | 10/10 | 2098 days | |
3.28 | 3% |
| Ina Daubenbuechel | 9/10 | 2099 days | |
3.28 | 3% |
| Nelle Dutilleur | 8/10 | 2101 days | |
3.11 | 3% |
| Johanna Bak | 10/10 | 2102 days | |
3.28 | 3% |
| David Esner | 10/10 | 2103 days | |
3.27 | 3% |
| Felix | 10/10 | 2103 days | |
3.27 | 3% |
| David Brooks | 10/10 | 2103 days | |
3.27 | 3% |
| Camille Gagnant | 5/10 | 2104 days | |
2.65 | 2% |
| kamil Benes | 6/10 | 2111 days | |
2.71 | 2% |
| Johannes Markus | 6/10 | 2112 days | |
2.7 | 2% |
| Greg Fischer | 10/10 | 2112 days | |
3.26 | 3% |
| Harel Cliad | 10/10 | 2112 days | |
3.26 | 3% |
| Danica Vrsljko | 7/10 | 2112 days | |
2.97 | 3% |
| Simon Cassie | 9/10 | 2113 days | |
3.26 | 3% |
| nimrod yaron | 10/10 | 2113 days | |
3.26 | 3% |
| Claire Dann | 7/10 | 2114 days | |
2.96 | 3% |
| Carina Huhmann | 8/10 | 2119 days | |
3.08 | 3% |
| Anne Schneider | 10/10 | 2119 days | |
3.25 | 3% |
| Hennk Hartke | 9/10 | 2120 days | |
3.24 | 3% |
| Charles Busnel | 10/10 | 2121 days | |
3.24 | 3% |
| Paige Galbraith | 8/10 | 2122 days | |
3.08 | 3% |
| Bjorn Van Mulders | 9/10 | 2124 days | |
3.24 | 3% |
| Kim Maertens | 8/10 | 2124 days | |
3.08 | 3% |
| Eric and Nienke | 10/10 | 2145 days | 3.2 | 3% | |
| Elly Kappert | 10/10 | 2175 days | 3.15 | 3% | |
| Sylvia Klatt | 10/10 | 2389 days | |
2.78 | 2% |
| Supiot Zudovic | 10/10 | 2402 days | |
2.76 | 2% |
| Fjord | 9/10 | 2404 days | |
2.76 | 2% |
| Sophie Spady | 10/10 | 2406 days | |
2.76 | 2% |
| Soizic | 9/10 | 2406 days | |
2.76 | 2% |
| Christofer Tonn | 10/10 | 2406 days | |
2.76 | 2% |
| Ken Milligan | 8/10 | 2407 days | |
2.62 | 2% |
| Sarah Horn | 9/10 | 2408 days | |
2.75 | 2% |
| Yu-Ti Chu | 8/10 | 2411 days | |
2.61 | 2% |
| Ton Martens | 10/10 | 2411 days | |
2.75 | 2% |
| Hendrik Rother | 9/10 | 2411 days | |
2.75 | 2% |
| Nora | 8/10 | 2413 days | |
2.61 | 2% |
| Katey Justice | 10/10 | 2415 days | |
2.74 | 2% |
| Douglas Walker | 8/10 | 2415 days | |
2.6 | 2% |
| tim wettack | 10/10 | 2420 days | 2.73 | 2% | |
| Marketa | 9/10 | 2420 days | |
2.73 | 2% |
| Sabisch Moritz | 9/10 | 2420 days | |
2.73 | 2% |
| Stella Thoben | 10/10 | 2422 days | |
2.73 | 2% |
| Paul Liecke | 9/10 | 2422 days | |
2.73 | 2% |
| Caderet | 10/10 | 2422 days | |
2.73 | 2% |
| James Young | 10/10 | 2422 days | |
2.73 | 2% |
| Florent Corino | 9/10 | 2424 days | |
2.72 | 2% |
| Lea Bulle | 9/10 | 2424 days | |
2.72 | 2% |
| Tobi | 5/10 | 2425 days | |
2.21 | 1% |
| Ian | 8/10 | 2426 days | |
2.58 | 2% |
| Anna Niesl | 10/10 | 2426 days | |
2.72 | 2% |
| Janine Kohlgrueler | 9/10 | 2427 days | |
2.72 | 2% |
| Arno Leleu | 8/10 | 2429 days | |
2.58 | 2% |
| Alessa Ndra | 10/10 | 2430 days | |
2.71 | 2% |
| Patrick O'Connell | 10/10 | 2430 days | |
2.71 | 2% |
| Francois Marchar | 6/10 | 2430 days | |
2.25 | 1% |
| Kristine and William | 5/10 | 2433 days | |
2.19 | 1% |
| Veronica and Jordi | 10/10 | 2439 days | |
2.7 | 2% |
| Johnny McManmon | 9/10 | 2441 days | |
2.7 | 2% |
| Christoph Mueller | 6/10 | 2442 days | |
2.24 | 1% |
| Nora and Edward | 8/10 | 2443 days | |
2.56 | 2% |
| Christina Rodewald | 8/10 | 2453 days | |
2.54 | 2% |
| Nadine and Jan | 8/10 | 2492 days | |
2.48 | 1% |
| Henrik Steinruecken | 8/10 | 2492 days | |
2.48 | 1% |
| Wertra | 9/10 | 2493 days | |
2.61 | 2% |
| Aurelie Morin | 9/10 | 2501 days | |
2.59 | 2% |
| Leticia Martin | 10/10 | 2501 days | |
2.59 | 2% |
| Martin Thomas | 9/10 | 2502 days | |
2.59 | 2% |
| Franz Schueler | 10/10 | 2502 days | |
2.59 | 2% |
| F Soppelsa | 1/10 | 2503 days | |
1.89 | 0% |
| Dirk | 4/10 | 2508 days | |
2.04 | 0% |
| Katharina Pape | 8/10 | 2508 days | |
2.45 | 1% |
| Abby Rushmer | 9/10 | 2509 days | |
2.58 | 2% |
| Sasha and Sandra Bonavia | 10/10 | 2510 days | |
2.58 | 2% |
| Dio | 8/10 | 2512 days | |
2.44 | 1% |
| Stephan Olivier | 8/10 | 2514 days | |
2.44 | 1% |
| Stephan Olivier | 8/10 | 2514 days | |
2.44 | 1% |
| Anna | 9/10 | 2752 days | |
2.16 | 1% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Motueka i-SITE Visitor Information Centre does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Final Ranking Score
89%
The final ranking score once rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.