Ranking Score Explained
Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Motueka i-SITE Visitor Information Centre.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Motueka i-SITE Visitor Information Centre
Valid Reviews
175 Valid Reviews
The Motueka i-SITE Visitor Information Centre experience has a total of 177 reviews. There are 175 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 175 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 68 |
|
39% |
| 9/10 | 38 |
|
22% |
| 8/10 | 37 |
|
21% |
| 7/10 | 12 |
|
7% |
| 6/10 | 9 |
|
5% |
| 5/10 | 6 |
|
3% |
| 4/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
85.71% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Motueka i-SITE Visitor Information Centre valid reviews is 85.71% and is based on 175 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
165 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 175 valid reviews, the experience has 165 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 165 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 59 |
|
36% |
| 9/10 | 38 |
|
23% |
| 8/10 | 37 |
|
22% |
| 7/10 | 12 |
|
7% |
| 6/10 | 9 |
|
5% |
| 5/10 | 6 |
|
4% |
| 4/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
85.39% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Motueka i-SITE Visitor Information Centre face-to-face reviews is 85.39% and is based on 165 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
88.80%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Face-to-Face | Weight | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Weslake | 10/10 | 535 days | 54.64 | 100% | |
| Rebecca Martin | 10/10 | 580 days | 47.03 | 85% | |
| Sophie Ingram | 10/10 | 715 days | 27.88 | 49% | |
| C Flynn | 1/10 | 975 days | 5.32 | 6% | |
| Josh Lesley-Smith | 10/10 | 996 days |  |
6.55 | 8% |
| Marc | 9/10 | 1016 days | |
5.99 | 7% |
| Emily Noyd | 9/10 | 1253 days | |
4.76 | 5% |
| Cayla Stanley | 10/10 | 1253 days | |
4.76 | 5% |
| Salvador Jimenez | 10/10 | 1324 days | 4.65 | 5% | |
| Philipp Richter | 6/10 | 1392 days | |
3.77 | 3% |
| Simon Quass | 10/10 | 1393 days | |
4.55 | 5% |
| Sarah Boettcher | 9/10 | 1400 days | |
4.54 | 5% |
| Clement Oudjaovok | 8/10 | 1618 days | |
3.99 | 4% |
| Katherine Halliday | 9/10 | 1620 days | |
4.2 | 4% |
| Daniela Wall | 7/10 | 1620 days | |
3.82 | 3% |
| Katherine Britten | 9/10 | 1623 days | |
4.2 | 4% |
| Megan | 10/10 | 1624 days | |
4.19 | 4% |
| Nina Müller | 9/10 | 1646 days | |
4.16 | 4% |
| Maria Schober | 4/10 | 1647 days | |
3.29 | 2% |
| Marie Schmid | 10/10 | 1652 days | |
4.15 | 4% |
| Charles Aubry | 10/10 | 1653 days | |
4.15 | 4% |
| Arvid Hellquist | 9/10 | 1663 days | |
4.14 | 4% |
| Celia Nowak | 8/10 | 1664 days | |
3.93 | 3% |
| Jiri Blecha | 8/10 | 1665 days | |
3.93 | 3% |
| Marie Weber | 9/10 | 1665 days | |
4.13 | 4% |
| Michal Kamradek | 7/10 | 1700 days | |
3.71 | 3% |
| Dieter Schmees | 9/10 | 1702 days | |
4.08 | 4% |
| Barbara | 9/10 | 1704 days | |
4.07 | 4% |
| Mathieu Brunel | 10/10 | 1704 days | |
4.07 | 4% |
| Thomas and Sonja | 10/10 | 1713 days | |
4.06 | 4% |
| Jam Boggomann | 10/10 | 1717 days | |
4.05 | 4% |
| Pauline Gibson | 10/10 | 1719 days | |
4.05 | 4% |
| Ian Brand | 10/10 | 1720 days | 4.05 | 4% | |
| Antoine Vernay | 8/10 | 1726 days | |
3.84 | 3% |
| Shona MacDonald | 10/10 | 1962 days | |
3.68 | 3% |
| Ane Didriksen | 10/10 | 1962 days | |
3.68 | 3% |
| Iris Anette Berger | 10/10 | 1962 days | |
3.68 | 3% |
| Claudia de Winter | 7/10 | 1967 days | |
3.34 | 2% |
| Cecilia Anderson | 4/10 | 1967 days | |
2.9 | 1% |
| Christina Perez | 8/10 | 1971 days | |
3.48 | 3% |
| Paula Renton | 8/10 | 1972 days | |
3.48 | 3% |
| Maria-Julia Frilaj | 9/10 | 1973 days | |
3.66 | 3% |
| Simon Mehlmann | 9/10 | 1973 days | |
3.66 | 3% |
| Carolin Siegert | 9/10 | 1973 days | |
3.66 | 3% |
| Pavel Jarolimek | 5/10 | 1973 days | |
2.97 | 2% |
| Patricia Erni | 8/10 | 1974 days | |
3.48 | 3% |
| Robert Erni | 8/10 | 1974 days | |
3.48 | 3% |
| Lilli Erni | 8/10 | 1974 days | |
3.48 | 3% |
| Erik Nestlez | 8/10 | 1979 days | |
3.47 | 3% |
| Wouter Vanmoz | 10/10 | 1980 days | |
3.65 | 3% |
| Laure Cops | 9/10 | 1980 days | |
3.65 | 3% |
| Annika Marz | 10/10 | 1988 days | |
3.64 | 3% |
| Julian Zeissler | 8/10 | 1988 days | |
3.46 | 2% |
| Adam | 7/10 | 1988 days | |
3.31 | 2% |
| Petra Albrchtoval | 6/10 | 1988 days | |
3.02 | 2% |
| Lena Hanhart | 7/10 | 1993 days | |
3.31 | 2% |
| Drame Mahmadou | 8/10 | 1993 days | |
3.45 | 2% |
| Joanna Mulcahy | 10/10 | 1993 days | |
3.63 | 3% |
| Helma Druyken | 9/10 | 1994 days | |
3.63 | 3% |
| marcel and conny | 10/10 | 1996 days | 3.63 | 3% | |
| Helen | 10/10 | 1996 days | |
3.63 | 3% |
| Igor | 7/10 | 1996 days | |
3.3 | 2% |
| Ray Bygrave | 9/10 | 1997 days | |
3.63 | 3% |
| Maria Camen Santos Lopez | 10/10 | 1997 days | |
3.63 | 3% |
| Veeh Barrington | 8/10 | 1997 days | |
3.45 | 2% |
| Hirsch Svenja | 10/10 | 1999 days | |
3.62 | 3% |
| Mahr Svenja | 7/10 | 1999 days | |
3.3 | 2% |
| Johanna Kofler | 6/10 | 1999 days | |
3.01 | 2% |
| Kathrin Deichmann | 7/10 | 2001 days | |
3.3 | 2% |
| Konrad Ullmann | 8/10 | 2002 days | |
3.44 | 2% |
| Lukas Lehmeyer | 8/10 | 2002 days | |
3.44 | 2% |
| Mark Hofmann | 9/10 | 2002 days | |
3.62 | 3% |
| Louison Laissus | 10/10 | 2005 days | |
3.61 | 3% |
| Ennico | 10/10 | 2008 days | |
3.61 | 3% |
| Juliane | 7/10 | 2008 days | |
3.29 | 2% |
| Hannah | 7/10 | 2008 days | |
3.29 | 2% |
| Callum | 6/10 | 2008 days | |
3.0 | 2% |
| Barbara | 10/10 | 2008 days | |
3.61 | 3% |
| Marinette | 10/10 | 2008 days | |
3.61 | 3% |
| Larry Majerus | 10/10 | 2009 days | |
3.61 | 3% |
| Jan Majerus | 10/10 | 2009 days | |
3.61 | 3% |
| Philip Donachie | 10/10 | 2012 days | |
3.6 | 3% |
| Luisa Bach | 10/10 | 2012 days | |
3.6 | 3% |
| Karel | 10/10 | 2012 days | |
3.6 | 3% |
| Phillip | 8/10 | 2014 days | |
3.42 | 2% |
| Libby | 5/10 | 2017 days | |
2.91 | 1% |
| Colin Billington | 5/10 | 2018 days | |
2.91 | 1% |
| Gassat | 10/10 | 2018 days | |
3.6 | 3% |
| Janis Gallois | 8/10 | 2019 days | |
3.41 | 2% |
| Andreas Jung | 6/10 | 2020 days | |
2.98 | 2% |
| Francisco Pablo Miguel | 8/10 | 2021 days | |
3.41 | 2% |
| Constanza Salas | 10/10 | 2029 days | |
3.58 | 3% |
| Jesse Flynn | 8/10 | 2031 days | |
3.4 | 2% |
| Andrea Hiemer | 10/10 | 2031 days | |
3.58 | 3% |
| Bella Danaher | 9/10 | 2033 days | |
3.57 | 3% |
| Daniel Danamer | 10/10 | 2033 days | |
3.57 | 3% |
| Christina Habranke | 10/10 | 2036 days | |
3.57 | 3% |
| Julia Bonisch | 10/10 | 2039 days | |
3.56 | 3% |
| Ina Daubenbuechel | 9/10 | 2040 days | |
3.56 | 3% |
| Nelle Dutilleur | 8/10 | 2042 days | |
3.38 | 2% |
| Johanna Bak | 10/10 | 2043 days | |
3.56 | 3% |
| David Esner | 10/10 | 2044 days | |
3.56 | 3% |
| Felix | 10/10 | 2044 days | |
3.56 | 3% |
| David Brooks | 10/10 | 2044 days | |
3.56 | 3% |
| Camille Gagnant | 5/10 | 2045 days | |
2.88 | 1% |
| kamil Benes | 6/10 | 2052 days | |
2.94 | 2% |
| Johannes Markus | 6/10 | 2053 days | |
2.94 | 2% |
| Greg Fischer | 10/10 | 2053 days | |
3.54 | 3% |
| Harel Cliad | 10/10 | 2053 days | |
3.54 | 3% |
| Danica Vrsljko | 7/10 | 2053 days | |
3.22 | 2% |
| Simon Cassie | 9/10 | 2054 days | |
3.54 | 3% |
| nimrod yaron | 10/10 | 2054 days | |
3.54 | 3% |
| Claire Dann | 7/10 | 2055 days | |
3.22 | 2% |
| Carina Huhmann | 8/10 | 2060 days | |
3.35 | 2% |
| Anne Schneider | 10/10 | 2060 days | |
3.53 | 3% |
| Hennk Hartke | 9/10 | 2061 days | |
3.53 | 3% |
| Charles Busnel | 10/10 | 2062 days | |
3.53 | 3% |
| Paige Galbraith | 8/10 | 2063 days | |
3.35 | 2% |
| Bjorn Van Mulders | 9/10 | 2065 days | |
3.52 | 3% |
| Kim Maertens | 8/10 | 2065 days | |
3.35 | 2% |
| Eric and Nienke | 10/10 | 2086 days | 3.49 | 3% | |
| Elly Kappert | 10/10 | 2116 days | 3.45 | 2% | |
| Sylvia Klatt | 10/10 | 2330 days | |
3.12 | 2% |
| Supiot Zudovic | 10/10 | 2343 days | |
3.1 | 2% |
| Fjord | 9/10 | 2345 days | |
3.1 | 2% |
| Sophie Spady | 10/10 | 2347 days | |
3.09 | 2% |
| Soizic | 9/10 | 2347 days | |
3.09 | 2% |
| Christofer Tonn | 10/10 | 2347 days | |
3.09 | 2% |
| Ken Milligan | 8/10 | 2348 days | |
2.94 | 1% |
| Sarah Horn | 9/10 | 2349 days | |
3.09 | 2% |
| Yu-Ti Chu | 8/10 | 2352 days | |
2.93 | 1% |
| Ton Martens | 10/10 | 2352 days | |
3.09 | 2% |
| Hendrik Rother | 9/10 | 2352 days | |
3.09 | 2% |
| Nora | 8/10 | 2354 days | |
2.93 | 1% |
| Katey Justice | 10/10 | 2356 days | |
3.08 | 2% |
| Douglas Walker | 8/10 | 2356 days | |
2.93 | 1% |
| tim wettack | 10/10 | 2361 days | 3.07 | 2% | |
| Marketa | 9/10 | 2361 days | |
3.07 | 2% |
| Sabisch Moritz | 9/10 | 2361 days | |
3.07 | 2% |
| Stella Thoben | 10/10 | 2363 days | |
3.07 | 2% |
| Paul Liecke | 9/10 | 2363 days | |
3.07 | 2% |
| Caderet | 10/10 | 2363 days | |
3.07 | 2% |
| James Young | 10/10 | 2363 days | |
3.07 | 2% |
| Florent Corino | 9/10 | 2365 days | |
3.07 | 2% |
| Lea Bulle | 9/10 | 2365 days | |
3.07 | 2% |
| Tobi | 5/10 | 2366 days | |
2.48 | 1% |
| Ian | 8/10 | 2367 days | |
2.91 | 1% |
| Anna Niesl | 10/10 | 2367 days | |
3.06 | 2% |
| Janine Kohlgrueler | 9/10 | 2368 days | |
3.06 | 2% |
| Arno Leleu | 8/10 | 2370 days | |
2.91 | 1% |
| Alessa Ndra | 10/10 | 2371 days | |
3.06 | 2% |
| Patrick O'Connell | 10/10 | 2371 days | |
3.06 | 2% |
| Francois Marchar | 6/10 | 2371 days | |
2.54 | 1% |
| Kristine and William | 5/10 | 2374 days | |
2.47 | 1% |
| Veronica and Jordi | 10/10 | 2380 days | |
3.04 | 2% |
| Johnny McManmon | 9/10 | 2382 days | |
3.04 | 2% |
| Christoph Mueller | 6/10 | 2383 days | |
2.52 | 1% |
| Nora and Edward | 8/10 | 2384 days | |
2.89 | 1% |
| Christina Rodewald | 8/10 | 2394 days | |
2.87 | 1% |
| Nadine and Jan | 8/10 | 2433 days | |
2.82 | 1% |
| Henrik Steinruecken | 8/10 | 2433 days | |
2.82 | 1% |
| Wertra | 9/10 | 2434 days | |
2.96 | 2% |
| Aurelie Morin | 9/10 | 2442 days | |
2.95 | 2% |
| Leticia Martin | 10/10 | 2442 days | |
2.95 | 2% |
| Martin Thomas | 9/10 | 2443 days | |
2.95 | 2% |
| Franz Schueler | 10/10 | 2443 days | |
2.95 | 2% |
| F Soppelsa | 1/10 | 2444 days | |
2.15 | 0% |
| Dirk | 4/10 | 2449 days | |
2.32 | 0% |
| Katharina Pape | 8/10 | 2449 days | |
2.79 | 1% |
| Abby Rushmer | 9/10 | 2450 days | |
2.94 | 1% |
| Sasha and Sandra Bonavia | 10/10 | 2451 days | |
2.94 | 1% |
| Dio | 8/10 | 2453 days | |
2.79 | 1% |
| Stephan Olivier | 8/10 | 2455 days | |
2.78 | 1% |
| Stephan Olivier | 8/10 | 2455 days | |
2.78 | 1% |
| Anna | 9/10 | 2692 days | |
2.57 | 1% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Motueka i-SITE Visitor Information Centre does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Final Ranking Score
89%
The final ranking score once rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.