Ranking Score Explained
Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Motueka i-SITE Visitor Information Centre.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Motueka i-SITE Visitor Information Centre
Valid Reviews
175 Valid Reviews
The Motueka i-SITE Visitor Information Centre experience has a total of 177 reviews. There are 175 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 175 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 68 |
|
39% |
| 9/10 | 38 |
|
22% |
| 8/10 | 37 |
|
21% |
| 7/10 | 12 |
|
7% |
| 6/10 | 9 |
|
5% |
| 5/10 | 6 |
|
3% |
| 4/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
85.71% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Motueka i-SITE Visitor Information Centre valid reviews is 85.71% and is based on 175 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
165 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 175 valid reviews, the experience has 165 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 165 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 59 |
|
36% |
| 9/10 | 38 |
|
23% |
| 8/10 | 37 |
|
22% |
| 7/10 | 12 |
|
7% |
| 6/10 | 9 |
|
5% |
| 5/10 | 6 |
|
4% |
| 4/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
85.39% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Motueka i-SITE Visitor Information Centre face-to-face reviews is 85.39% and is based on 165 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
87.38%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Face-to-Face | Weight | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Weslake | 10/10 | 862 days | 13.6 | 100% | |
| Rebecca Martin | 10/10 | 907 days | 10.6 | 76% | |
| Sophie Ingram | 10/10 | 1043 days | 5.43 | 34% | |
| C Flynn | 1/10 | 1302 days | 3.35 | 17% | |
| Josh Lesley-Smith | 10/10 | 1323 days |  |
4.55 | 27% |
| Marc | 9/10 | 1343 days | |
4.51 | 27% |
| Emily Noyd | 9/10 | 1580 days | |
4.05 | 23% |
| Cayla Stanley | 10/10 | 1580 days | |
4.05 | 23% |
| Salvador Jimenez | 10/10 | 1652 days | 3.91 | 22% | |
| Philipp Richter | 6/10 | 1719 days | |
3.14 | 15% |
| Simon Quass | 10/10 | 1720 days | |
3.78 | 21% |
| Sarah Boettcher | 9/10 | 1727 days | |
3.76 | 20% |
| Clement Oudjaovok | 8/10 | 1945 days | |
3.17 | 16% |
| Katherine Halliday | 9/10 | 1947 days | |
3.33 | 17% |
| Daniela Wall | 7/10 | 1947 days | |
3.03 | 15% |
| Katherine Britten | 9/10 | 1950 days | |
3.33 | 17% |
| Megan | 10/10 | 1951 days | |
3.32 | 17% |
| Nina Müller | 9/10 | 1973 days | |
3.28 | 17% |
| Maria Schober | 4/10 | 1974 days | |
2.59 | 11% |
| Marie Schmid | 10/10 | 1979 days | |
3.27 | 16% |
| Charles Aubry | 10/10 | 1980 days | |
3.27 | 16% |
| Arvid Hellquist | 9/10 | 1990 days | |
3.25 | 16% |
| Celia Nowak | 8/10 | 1991 days | |
3.08 | 15% |
| Jiri Blecha | 8/10 | 1992 days | |
3.08 | 15% |
| Marie Weber | 9/10 | 1992 days | |
3.24 | 16% |
| Michal Kamradek | 7/10 | 2027 days | |
2.89 | 13% |
| Dieter Schmees | 9/10 | 2029 days | |
3.17 | 16% |
| Barbara | 9/10 | 2031 days | |
3.17 | 16% |
| Mathieu Brunel | 10/10 | 2031 days | |
3.17 | 16% |
| Thomas and Sonja | 10/10 | 2040 days | |
3.15 | 16% |
| Jam Boggomann | 10/10 | 2044 days | |
3.14 | 15% |
| Pauline Gibson | 10/10 | 2046 days | |
3.14 | 15% |
| Ian Brand | 10/10 | 2048 days | 3.14 | 15% | |
| Antoine Vernay | 8/10 | 2053 days | |
2.97 | 14% |
| Shona MacDonald | 10/10 | 2289 days | |
2.66 | 12% |
| Ane Didriksen | 10/10 | 2289 days | |
2.66 | 12% |
| Iris Anette Berger | 10/10 | 2289 days | |
2.66 | 12% |
| Claudia de Winter | 7/10 | 2294 days | |
2.41 | 10% |
| Cecilia Anderson | 4/10 | 2294 days | |
2.1 | 7% |
| Christina Perez | 8/10 | 2298 days | |
2.51 | 10% |
| Paula Renton | 8/10 | 2299 days | |
2.51 | 10% |
| Maria-Julia Frilaj | 9/10 | 2300 days | |
2.64 | 11% |
| Simon Mehlmann | 9/10 | 2300 days | |
2.64 | 11% |
| Carolin Siegert | 9/10 | 2300 days | |
2.64 | 11% |
| Pavel Jarolimek | 5/10 | 2300 days | |
2.14 | 7% |
| Patricia Erni | 8/10 | 2301 days | |
2.51 | 10% |
| Robert Erni | 8/10 | 2301 days | |
2.51 | 10% |
| Lilli Erni | 8/10 | 2301 days | |
2.51 | 10% |
| Erik Nestlez | 8/10 | 2306 days | |
2.5 | 10% |
| Wouter Vanmoz | 10/10 | 2307 days | |
2.63 | 11% |
| Laure Cops | 9/10 | 2307 days | |
2.63 | 11% |
| Annika Marz | 10/10 | 2315 days | |
2.61 | 11% |
| Julian Zeissler | 8/10 | 2315 days | |
2.48 | 10% |
| Adam | 7/10 | 2315 days | |
2.38 | 9% |
| Petra Albrchtoval | 6/10 | 2315 days | |
2.17 | 8% |
| Lena Hanhart | 7/10 | 2320 days | |
2.37 | 9% |
| Drame Mahmadou | 8/10 | 2320 days | |
2.47 | 10% |
| Joanna Mulcahy | 10/10 | 2320 days | |
2.6 | 11% |
| Helma Druyken | 9/10 | 2321 days | |
2.6 | 11% |
| marcel and conny | 10/10 | 2323 days | 2.6 | 11% | |
| Helen | 10/10 | 2323 days | |
2.6 | 11% |
| Igor | 7/10 | 2323 days | |
2.36 | 9% |
| Ray Bygrave | 9/10 | 2324 days | |
2.59 | 11% |
| Maria Camen Santos Lopez | 10/10 | 2324 days | |
2.59 | 11% |
| Veeh Barrington | 8/10 | 2324 days | |
2.47 | 10% |
| Hirsch Svenja | 10/10 | 2326 days | |
2.59 | 11% |
| Mahr Svenja | 7/10 | 2326 days | |
2.36 | 9% |
| Johanna Kofler | 6/10 | 2326 days | |
2.15 | 7% |
| Kathrin Deichmann | 7/10 | 2328 days | |
2.35 | 9% |
| Konrad Ullmann | 8/10 | 2329 days | |
2.46 | 10% |
| Lukas Lehmeyer | 8/10 | 2329 days | |
2.46 | 10% |
| Mark Hofmann | 9/10 | 2329 days | |
2.59 | 11% |
| Louison Laissus | 10/10 | 2332 days | |
2.58 | 11% |
| Ennico | 10/10 | 2335 days | |
2.57 | 11% |
| Juliane | 7/10 | 2335 days | |
2.34 | 9% |
| Hannah | 7/10 | 2335 days | |
2.34 | 9% |
| Callum | 6/10 | 2335 days | |
2.14 | 7% |
| Barbara | 10/10 | 2335 days | |
2.57 | 11% |
| Marinette | 10/10 | 2335 days | |
2.57 | 11% |
| Larry Majerus | 10/10 | 2336 days | |
2.57 | 11% |
| Jan Majerus | 10/10 | 2336 days | |
2.57 | 11% |
| Philip Donachie | 10/10 | 2339 days | |
2.57 | 11% |
| Luisa Bach | 10/10 | 2339 days | |
2.57 | 11% |
| Karel | 10/10 | 2339 days | |
2.57 | 11% |
| Phillip | 8/10 | 2341 days | |
2.43 | 10% |
| Libby | 5/10 | 2344 days | |
2.07 | 7% |
| Colin Billington | 5/10 | 2345 days | |
2.07 | 7% |
| Gassat | 10/10 | 2345 days | |
2.55 | 11% |
| Janis Gallois | 8/10 | 2346 days | |
2.42 | 10% |
| Andreas Jung | 6/10 | 2347 days | |
2.12 | 7% |
| Francisco Pablo Miguel | 8/10 | 2348 days | |
2.42 | 10% |
| Constanza Salas | 10/10 | 2356 days | |
2.53 | 11% |
| Jesse Flynn | 8/10 | 2358 days | |
2.4 | 9% |
| Andrea Hiemer | 10/10 | 2358 days | |
2.53 | 10% |
| Bella Danaher | 9/10 | 2360 days | |
2.52 | 10% |
| Daniel Danamer | 10/10 | 2360 days | |
2.52 | 10% |
| Christina Habranke | 10/10 | 2363 days | |
2.52 | 10% |
| Julia Bonisch | 10/10 | 2366 days | |
2.51 | 10% |
| Ina Daubenbuechel | 9/10 | 2367 days | |
2.51 | 10% |
| Nelle Dutilleur | 8/10 | 2369 days | |
2.38 | 9% |
| Johanna Bak | 10/10 | 2370 days | |
2.5 | 10% |
| David Esner | 10/10 | 2371 days | |
2.5 | 10% |
| Felix | 10/10 | 2371 days | |
2.5 | 10% |
| David Brooks | 10/10 | 2371 days | |
2.5 | 10% |
| Camille Gagnant | 5/10 | 2372 days | |
2.03 | 6% |
| kamil Benes | 6/10 | 2379 days | |
2.06 | 7% |
| Johannes Markus | 6/10 | 2380 days | |
2.06 | 7% |
| Greg Fischer | 10/10 | 2380 days | |
2.49 | 10% |
| Harel Cliad | 10/10 | 2380 days | |
2.49 | 10% |
| Danica Vrsljko | 7/10 | 2380 days | |
2.26 | 8% |
| Simon Cassie | 9/10 | 2381 days | |
2.48 | 10% |
| nimrod yaron | 10/10 | 2381 days | |
2.48 | 10% |
| Claire Dann | 7/10 | 2382 days | |
2.26 | 8% |
| Carina Huhmann | 8/10 | 2387 days | |
2.35 | 9% |
| Anne Schneider | 10/10 | 2387 days | |
2.47 | 10% |
| Hennk Hartke | 9/10 | 2388 days | |
2.47 | 10% |
| Charles Busnel | 10/10 | 2389 days | |
2.47 | 10% |
| Paige Galbraith | 8/10 | 2390 days | |
2.34 | 9% |
| Bjorn Van Mulders | 9/10 | 2392 days | |
2.46 | 10% |
| Kim Maertens | 8/10 | 2392 days | |
2.34 | 9% |
| Eric and Nienke | 10/10 | 2413 days | 2.42 | 10% | |
| Elly Kappert | 10/10 | 2443 days | 2.36 | 9% | |
| Sylvia Klatt | 10/10 | 2657 days | |
1.94 | 6% |
| Supiot Zudovic | 10/10 | 2670 days | |
1.92 | 6% |
| Fjord | 9/10 | 2672 days | |
1.91 | 6% |
| Sophie Spady | 10/10 | 2674 days | |
1.91 | 5% |
| Soizic | 9/10 | 2674 days | |
1.91 | 5% |
| Christofer Tonn | 10/10 | 2674 days | |
1.91 | 5% |
| Ken Milligan | 8/10 | 2675 days | |
1.81 | 5% |
| Sarah Horn | 9/10 | 2676 days | |
1.91 | 5% |
| Yu-Ti Chu | 8/10 | 2679 days | |
1.81 | 5% |
| Ton Martens | 10/10 | 2679 days | |
1.9 | 5% |
| Hendrik Rother | 9/10 | 2679 days | |
1.9 | 5% |
| Nora | 8/10 | 2681 days | |
1.8 | 5% |
| Katey Justice | 10/10 | 2683 days | |
1.89 | 5% |
| Douglas Walker | 8/10 | 2683 days | |
1.8 | 5% |
| tim wettack | 10/10 | 2688 days | 1.88 | 5% | |
| Marketa | 9/10 | 2688 days | |
1.88 | 5% |
| Sabisch Moritz | 9/10 | 2688 days | |
1.88 | 5% |
| Stella Thoben | 10/10 | 2690 days | |
1.88 | 5% |
| Paul Liecke | 9/10 | 2690 days | |
1.88 | 5% |
| Caderet | 10/10 | 2690 days | |
1.88 | 5% |
| James Young | 10/10 | 2690 days | |
1.88 | 5% |
| Florent Corino | 9/10 | 2692 days | |
1.87 | 5% |
| Lea Bulle | 9/10 | 2692 days | |
1.87 | 5% |
| Tobi | 5/10 | 2693 days | |
1.52 | 2% |
| Ian | 8/10 | 2694 days | |
1.78 | 4% |
| Anna Niesl | 10/10 | 2694 days | |
1.87 | 5% |
| Janine Kohlgrueler | 9/10 | 2695 days | |
1.87 | 5% |
| Arno Leleu | 8/10 | 2697 days | |
1.77 | 4% |
| Alessa Ndra | 10/10 | 2698 days | |
1.86 | 5% |
| Patrick O'Connell | 10/10 | 2698 days | |
1.86 | 5% |
| Francois Marchar | 6/10 | 2698 days | |
1.55 | 3% |
| Kristine and William | 5/10 | 2701 days | |
1.5 | 2% |
| Veronica and Jordi | 10/10 | 2707 days | |
1.85 | 5% |
| Johnny McManmon | 9/10 | 2709 days | |
1.84 | 5% |
| Christoph Mueller | 6/10 | 2710 days | |
1.53 | 2% |
| Nora and Edward | 8/10 | 2711 days | |
1.75 | 4% |
| Christina Rodewald | 8/10 | 2721 days | |
1.73 | 4% |
| Nadine and Jan | 8/10 | 2760 days | |
1.65 | 3% |
| Henrik Steinruecken | 8/10 | 2760 days | |
1.65 | 3% |
| Wertra | 9/10 | 2761 days | |
1.74 | 4% |
| Aurelie Morin | 9/10 | 2769 days | |
1.72 | 4% |
| Leticia Martin | 10/10 | 2769 days | |
1.72 | 4% |
| Martin Thomas | 9/10 | 2770 days | |
1.72 | 4% |
| Franz Schueler | 10/10 | 2770 days | |
1.72 | 4% |
| F Soppelsa | 1/10 | 2771 days | |
1.26 | 0% |
| Dirk | 4/10 | 2776 days | |
1.35 | 1% |
| Katharina Pape | 8/10 | 2776 days | |
1.62 | 3% |
| Abby Rushmer | 9/10 | 2777 days | |
1.71 | 4% |
| Sasha and Sandra Bonavia | 10/10 | 2778 days | |
1.71 | 4% |
| Dio | 8/10 | 2780 days | |
1.62 | 3% |
| Stephan Olivier | 8/10 | 2782 days | |
1.61 | 3% |
| Stephan Olivier | 8/10 | 2782 days | |
1.61 | 3% |
| Anna | 9/10 | 3020 days | |
1.23 | 0% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Motueka i-SITE Visitor Information Centre does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Final Ranking Score
87%
The final ranking score once rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.