Ranking Score Explained
Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Motueka i-SITE Visitor Information Centre.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Motueka i-SITE Visitor Information Centre
Valid Reviews
175 Valid Reviews
The Motueka i-SITE Visitor Information Centre experience has a total of 177 reviews. There are 175 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 175 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 68 |
|
39% |
| 9/10 | 38 |
|
22% |
| 8/10 | 37 |
|
21% |
| 7/10 | 12 |
|
7% |
| 6/10 | 9 |
|
5% |
| 5/10 | 6 |
|
3% |
| 4/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
85.71% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Motueka i-SITE Visitor Information Centre valid reviews is 85.71% and is based on 175 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
165 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 175 valid reviews, the experience has 165 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 165 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 59 |
|
36% |
| 9/10 | 38 |
|
23% |
| 8/10 | 37 |
|
22% |
| 7/10 | 12 |
|
7% |
| 6/10 | 9 |
|
5% |
| 5/10 | 6 |
|
4% |
| 4/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
85.39% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Motueka i-SITE Visitor Information Centre face-to-face reviews is 85.39% and is based on 165 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
87.85%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Face-to-Face | Weight | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Weslake | 10/10 | 759 days | 22.89 | 100% | |
| Rebecca Martin | 10/10 | 804 days | 18.42 | 79% | |
| Sophie Ingram | 10/10 | 939 days | 8.86 | 35% | |
| C Flynn | 1/10 | 1199 days | 3.5 | 10% | |
| Josh Lesley-Smith | 10/10 | 1220 days |  |
4.76 | 16% |
| Marc | 9/10 | 1240 days | |
4.72 | 15% |
| Emily Noyd | 9/10 | 1477 days | |
4.25 | 13% |
| Cayla Stanley | 10/10 | 1477 days | |
4.25 | 13% |
| Salvador Jimenez | 10/10 | 1548 days | 4.11 | 13% | |
| Philipp Richter | 6/10 | 1616 days | |
3.3 | 9% |
| Simon Quass | 10/10 | 1617 days | |
3.98 | 12% |
| Sarah Boettcher | 9/10 | 1624 days | |
3.96 | 12% |
| Clement Oudjaovok | 8/10 | 1842 days | |
3.36 | 9% |
| Katherine Halliday | 9/10 | 1844 days | |
3.53 | 10% |
| Daniela Wall | 7/10 | 1844 days | |
3.22 | 8% |
| Katherine Britten | 9/10 | 1847 days | |
3.53 | 10% |
| Megan | 10/10 | 1848 days | |
3.53 | 10% |
| Nina Müller | 9/10 | 1870 days | |
3.48 | 10% |
| Maria Schober | 4/10 | 1871 days | |
2.75 | 6% |
| Marie Schmid | 10/10 | 1876 days | |
3.47 | 10% |
| Charles Aubry | 10/10 | 1877 days | |
3.47 | 10% |
| Arvid Hellquist | 9/10 | 1887 days | |
3.45 | 10% |
| Celia Nowak | 8/10 | 1888 days | |
3.28 | 9% |
| Jiri Blecha | 8/10 | 1889 days | |
3.27 | 9% |
| Marie Weber | 9/10 | 1889 days | |
3.45 | 10% |
| Michal Kamradek | 7/10 | 1924 days | |
3.07 | 8% |
| Dieter Schmees | 9/10 | 1926 days | |
3.37 | 9% |
| Barbara | 9/10 | 1928 days | |
3.37 | 9% |
| Mathieu Brunel | 10/10 | 1928 days | |
3.37 | 9% |
| Thomas and Sonja | 10/10 | 1937 days | |
3.35 | 9% |
| Jam Boggomann | 10/10 | 1941 days | |
3.34 | 9% |
| Pauline Gibson | 10/10 | 1943 days | |
3.34 | 9% |
| Ian Brand | 10/10 | 1944 days | 3.34 | 9% | |
| Antoine Vernay | 8/10 | 1950 days | |
3.16 | 8% |
| Shona MacDonald | 10/10 | 2186 days | |
2.86 | 7% |
| Ane Didriksen | 10/10 | 2186 days | |
2.86 | 7% |
| Iris Anette Berger | 10/10 | 2186 days | |
2.86 | 7% |
| Claudia de Winter | 7/10 | 2191 days | |
2.6 | 6% |
| Cecilia Anderson | 4/10 | 2191 days | |
2.26 | 4% |
| Christina Perez | 8/10 | 2195 days | |
2.7 | 6% |
| Paula Renton | 8/10 | 2196 days | |
2.7 | 6% |
| Maria-Julia Frilaj | 9/10 | 2197 days | |
2.84 | 7% |
| Simon Mehlmann | 9/10 | 2197 days | |
2.84 | 7% |
| Carolin Siegert | 9/10 | 2197 days | |
2.84 | 7% |
| Pavel Jarolimek | 5/10 | 2197 days | |
2.3 | 4% |
| Patricia Erni | 8/10 | 2198 days | |
2.7 | 6% |
| Robert Erni | 8/10 | 2198 days | |
2.7 | 6% |
| Lilli Erni | 8/10 | 2198 days | |
2.7 | 6% |
| Erik Nestlez | 8/10 | 2203 days | |
2.69 | 6% |
| Wouter Vanmoz | 10/10 | 2204 days | |
2.83 | 7% |
| Laure Cops | 9/10 | 2204 days | |
2.83 | 7% |
| Annika Marz | 10/10 | 2212 days | |
2.81 | 7% |
| Julian Zeissler | 8/10 | 2212 days | |
2.67 | 6% |
| Adam | 7/10 | 2212 days | |
2.56 | 5% |
| Petra Albrchtoval | 6/10 | 2212 days | |
2.34 | 4% |
| Lena Hanhart | 7/10 | 2217 days | |
2.55 | 5% |
| Drame Mahmadou | 8/10 | 2217 days | |
2.66 | 6% |
| Joanna Mulcahy | 10/10 | 2217 days | |
2.8 | 7% |
| Helma Druyken | 9/10 | 2218 days | |
2.8 | 7% |
| marcel and conny | 10/10 | 2220 days | 2.8 | 6% | |
| Helen | 10/10 | 2220 days | |
2.8 | 6% |
| Igor | 7/10 | 2220 days | |
2.55 | 5% |
| Ray Bygrave | 9/10 | 2221 days | |
2.8 | 6% |
| Maria Camen Santos Lopez | 10/10 | 2221 days | |
2.8 | 6% |
| Veeh Barrington | 8/10 | 2221 days | |
2.66 | 6% |
| Hirsch Svenja | 10/10 | 2223 days | |
2.79 | 6% |
| Mahr Svenja | 7/10 | 2223 days | |
2.54 | 5% |
| Johanna Kofler | 6/10 | 2223 days | |
2.32 | 4% |
| Kathrin Deichmann | 7/10 | 2225 days | |
2.54 | 5% |
| Konrad Ullmann | 8/10 | 2226 days | |
2.65 | 6% |
| Lukas Lehmeyer | 8/10 | 2226 days | |
2.65 | 6% |
| Mark Hofmann | 9/10 | 2226 days | |
2.79 | 6% |
| Louison Laissus | 10/10 | 2229 days | |
2.78 | 6% |
| Ennico | 10/10 | 2232 days | |
2.77 | 6% |
| Juliane | 7/10 | 2232 days | |
2.53 | 5% |
| Hannah | 7/10 | 2232 days | |
2.53 | 5% |
| Callum | 6/10 | 2232 days | |
2.3 | 4% |
| Barbara | 10/10 | 2232 days | |
2.77 | 6% |
| Marinette | 10/10 | 2232 days | |
2.77 | 6% |
| Larry Majerus | 10/10 | 2233 days | |
2.77 | 6% |
| Jan Majerus | 10/10 | 2233 days | |
2.77 | 6% |
| Philip Donachie | 10/10 | 2236 days | |
2.77 | 6% |
| Luisa Bach | 10/10 | 2236 days | |
2.77 | 6% |
| Karel | 10/10 | 2236 days | |
2.77 | 6% |
| Phillip | 8/10 | 2238 days | |
2.63 | 6% |
| Libby | 5/10 | 2241 days | |
2.23 | 4% |
| Colin Billington | 5/10 | 2242 days | |
2.23 | 4% |
| Gassat | 10/10 | 2242 days | |
2.76 | 6% |
| Janis Gallois | 8/10 | 2243 days | |
2.62 | 6% |
| Andreas Jung | 6/10 | 2244 days | |
2.28 | 4% |
| Francisco Pablo Miguel | 8/10 | 2245 days | |
2.61 | 6% |
| Constanza Salas | 10/10 | 2253 days | |
2.73 | 6% |
| Jesse Flynn | 8/10 | 2255 days | |
2.59 | 6% |
| Andrea Hiemer | 10/10 | 2255 days | |
2.73 | 6% |
| Bella Danaher | 9/10 | 2257 days | |
2.73 | 6% |
| Daniel Danamer | 10/10 | 2257 days | |
2.73 | 6% |
| Christina Habranke | 10/10 | 2260 days | |
2.72 | 6% |
| Julia Bonisch | 10/10 | 2263 days | |
2.71 | 6% |
| Ina Daubenbuechel | 9/10 | 2264 days | |
2.71 | 6% |
| Nelle Dutilleur | 8/10 | 2266 days | |
2.57 | 5% |
| Johanna Bak | 10/10 | 2267 days | |
2.71 | 6% |
| David Esner | 10/10 | 2268 days | |
2.7 | 6% |
| Felix | 10/10 | 2268 days | |
2.7 | 6% |
| David Brooks | 10/10 | 2268 days | |
2.7 | 6% |
| Camille Gagnant | 5/10 | 2269 days | |
2.19 | 4% |
| kamil Benes | 6/10 | 2276 days | |
2.23 | 4% |
| Johannes Markus | 6/10 | 2277 days | |
2.23 | 4% |
| Greg Fischer | 10/10 | 2277 days | |
2.69 | 6% |
| Harel Cliad | 10/10 | 2277 days | |
2.69 | 6% |
| Danica Vrsljko | 7/10 | 2277 days | |
2.45 | 5% |
| Simon Cassie | 9/10 | 2278 days | |
2.68 | 6% |
| nimrod yaron | 10/10 | 2278 days | |
2.68 | 6% |
| Claire Dann | 7/10 | 2279 days | |
2.44 | 5% |
| Carina Huhmann | 8/10 | 2284 days | |
2.54 | 5% |
| Anne Schneider | 10/10 | 2284 days | |
2.67 | 6% |
| Hennk Hartke | 9/10 | 2285 days | |
2.67 | 6% |
| Charles Busnel | 10/10 | 2286 days | |
2.67 | 6% |
| Paige Galbraith | 8/10 | 2287 days | |
2.53 | 5% |
| Bjorn Van Mulders | 9/10 | 2289 days | |
2.66 | 6% |
| Kim Maertens | 8/10 | 2289 days | |
2.53 | 5% |
| Eric and Nienke | 10/10 | 2310 days | 2.62 | 6% | |
| Elly Kappert | 10/10 | 2340 days | 2.56 | 5% | |
| Sylvia Klatt | 10/10 | 2554 days | |
2.14 | 3% |
| Supiot Zudovic | 10/10 | 2567 days | |
2.12 | 3% |
| Fjord | 9/10 | 2569 days | |
2.12 | 3% |
| Sophie Spady | 10/10 | 2571 days | |
2.11 | 3% |
| Soizic | 9/10 | 2571 days | |
2.11 | 3% |
| Christofer Tonn | 10/10 | 2571 days | |
2.11 | 3% |
| Ken Milligan | 8/10 | 2572 days | |
2.0 | 3% |
| Sarah Horn | 9/10 | 2573 days | |
2.11 | 3% |
| Yu-Ti Chu | 8/10 | 2576 days | |
2.0 | 3% |
| Ton Martens | 10/10 | 2576 days | |
2.1 | 3% |
| Hendrik Rother | 9/10 | 2576 days | |
2.1 | 3% |
| Nora | 8/10 | 2578 days | |
1.99 | 3% |
| Katey Justice | 10/10 | 2580 days | |
2.09 | 3% |
| Douglas Walker | 8/10 | 2580 days | |
1.99 | 3% |
| tim wettack | 10/10 | 2585 days | 2.08 | 3% | |
| Marketa | 9/10 | 2585 days | |
2.08 | 3% |
| Sabisch Moritz | 9/10 | 2585 days | |
2.08 | 3% |
| Stella Thoben | 10/10 | 2587 days | |
2.08 | 3% |
| Paul Liecke | 9/10 | 2587 days | |
2.08 | 3% |
| Caderet | 10/10 | 2587 days | |
2.08 | 3% |
| James Young | 10/10 | 2587 days | |
2.08 | 3% |
| Florent Corino | 9/10 | 2589 days | |
2.08 | 3% |
| Lea Bulle | 9/10 | 2589 days | |
2.08 | 3% |
| Tobi | 5/10 | 2590 days | |
1.68 | 1% |
| Ian | 8/10 | 2591 days | |
1.97 | 3% |
| Anna Niesl | 10/10 | 2591 days | |
2.07 | 3% |
| Janine Kohlgrueler | 9/10 | 2592 days | |
2.07 | 3% |
| Arno Leleu | 8/10 | 2594 days | |
1.96 | 3% |
| Alessa Ndra | 10/10 | 2595 days | |
2.06 | 3% |
| Patrick O'Connell | 10/10 | 2595 days | |
2.06 | 3% |
| Francois Marchar | 6/10 | 2595 days | |
1.71 | 1% |
| Kristine and William | 5/10 | 2598 days | |
1.67 | 1% |
| Veronica and Jordi | 10/10 | 2604 days | |
2.05 | 3% |
| Johnny McManmon | 9/10 | 2606 days | |
2.04 | 3% |
| Christoph Mueller | 6/10 | 2607 days | |
1.69 | 1% |
| Nora and Edward | 8/10 | 2608 days | |
1.94 | 2% |
| Christina Rodewald | 8/10 | 2618 days | |
1.92 | 2% |
| Nadine and Jan | 8/10 | 2657 days | |
1.85 | 2% |
| Henrik Steinruecken | 8/10 | 2657 days | |
1.85 | 2% |
| Wertra | 9/10 | 2658 days | |
1.94 | 3% |
| Aurelie Morin | 9/10 | 2666 days | |
1.93 | 2% |
| Leticia Martin | 10/10 | 2666 days | |
1.93 | 2% |
| Martin Thomas | 9/10 | 2667 days | |
1.92 | 2% |
| Franz Schueler | 10/10 | 2667 days | |
1.92 | 2% |
| F Soppelsa | 1/10 | 2668 days | |
1.4 | 0% |
| Dirk | 4/10 | 2673 days | |
1.51 | 1% |
| Katharina Pape | 8/10 | 2673 days | |
1.82 | 2% |
| Abby Rushmer | 9/10 | 2674 days | |
1.91 | 2% |
| Sasha and Sandra Bonavia | 10/10 | 2675 days | |
1.91 | 2% |
| Dio | 8/10 | 2677 days | |
1.81 | 2% |
| Stephan Olivier | 8/10 | 2679 days | |
1.81 | 2% |
| Stephan Olivier | 8/10 | 2679 days | |
1.81 | 2% |
| Anna | 9/10 | 2917 days | |
1.43 | 0% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Motueka i-SITE Visitor Information Centre does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Final Ranking Score
88%
The final ranking score once rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.