Ranking Score Explained

Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Picton i-SITE Visitor Information Centre.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Nick Morrison's avatar

Nick Morrison

Rankers owner

Picton i-SITE Visitor Information Centre

Valid Reviews

67 Valid Reviews

The Picton i-SITE Visitor Information Centre experience has a total of 67 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 67 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 15
22%
9/10 14
21%
8/10 17
25%
7/10 7
10%
6/10 6
9%
5/10 3
4%
4/10 2
3%
3/10 2
3%
2/10 1
1%
1/10 0
0%

78.81% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Picton i-SITE Visitor Information Centre valid reviews is 78.81% and is based on 67 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

64 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 67 valid reviews, the experience has 64 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 64 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 14
22%
9/10 14
22%
8/10 17
27%
7/10 7
11%
6/10 6
9%
5/10 2
3%
4/10 1
2%
3/10 2
3%
2/10 1
2%
1/10 0
0%

79.53% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Picton i-SITE Visitor Information Centre face-to-face reviews is 79.53% and is based on 64 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

85.84%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Face-to-Face Weight Relative Weight
Jean 10/10 489 days 62.11 100%
Sebastian Heinzelmann 10/10 1543 days true 4.12 4%
Ahmed Mohsen Aly 5/10 1676 days 3.13 3%
Stuart Cook 9/10 1911 days true 3.4 3%
Nina Müller 7/10 1937 days true 3.05 3%
Leonie Jennings 8/10 1955 days true 3.15 3%
Marie Weber 9/10 1956 days true 3.32 3%
Damaris Mayer 6/10 1961 days true 2.74 2%
Jamie McArthur 8/10 1972 days true 3.12 3%
Bart Hanssen 6/10 1990 days true 2.7 2%
Jutta Bernhart 9/10 2004 days true 3.22 3%
Nils Demattio 10/10 2008 days true 3.21 3%
Jan-Peter Stripp 8/10 2255 days true 2.59 2%
Paula Renton 6/10 2263 days true 2.25 1%
Adriana 4/10 2264 days true 2.14 1%
Becky 8/10 2265 days true 2.57 2%
Alex 10/10 2265 days true 2.71 2%
Romina De Hill 10/10 2285 days true 2.67 2%
Tom Hill 8/10 2285 days true 2.54 2%
Granjon 8/10 2288 days true 2.53 2%
Steffen 8/10 2290 days true 2.53 2%
Sergey Pronkin 7/10 2290 days true 2.42 2%
Nina Helmling 6/10 2290 days true 2.21 1%
Katja Kraffzik 10/10 2291 days true 2.66 2%
Vera Kreipe 10/10 2292 days true 2.66 2%
Maria = Moller Hansen 10/10 2298 days true 2.65 2%
Steven Lotrian 7/10 2301 days true 2.4 2%
Kristyna 9/10 2303 days true 2.64 2%
Sophia 6/10 2304 days true 2.19 1%
Klaus Petersen 7/10 2305 days true 2.4 2%
Anna Guzewiez 9/10 2306 days true 2.63 2%
Marc Engstle 6/10 2309 days true 2.18 1%
Leeann Newton 9/10 2313 days true 2.62 2%
GN100 8/10 2313 days true 2.49 2%
Verena 8/10 2314 days true 2.48 2%
Benjamin 8/10 2314 days true 2.48 2%
Jan Pekarek 10/10 2333 days true 2.58 2%
Lenka Dvorauova 9/10 2333 days true 2.58 2%
Johanna Bak 10/10 2334 days true 2.58 2%
Greg Fischer 10/10 2344 days true 2.56 2%
Chen Levin 5/10 2344 days true 2.07 1%
jonas meier 8/10 2351 days true 2.41 2%
Anja 9/10 2353 days true 2.54 2%
Peter elsleysams 8/10 2353 days true 2.41 2%
Paul Balfour 7/10 2356 days true 2.3 1%
Anton Thisted 8/10 2619 days true 1.92 1%
Josefine Sjodin 8/10 2619 days true 1.92 1%
Lorraine Doyle 3/10 2638 days true 1.52 0%
Soizic 9/10 2638 days true 1.98 1%
Sean Hurley 2/10 2638 days true 1.49 0%
Sarah Horn 8/10 2640 days true 1.88 1%
Sebastian Russell-Smits 9/10 2640 days true 1.98 1%
Gale Willcocks 9/10 2645 days true 1.97 1%
Glenn Surzur 8/10 2648 days true 1.86 1%
Will and Taylor 4/10 2652 days 1.54 0%
Marketa 9/10 2652 days true 1.95 1%
Sebastian 10/10 2656 days true 1.95 1%
Sanchez 7/10 2664 days true 1.76 0%
Michal Maly 10/10 2678 days true 1.9 1%
Tanja and Pascal 3/10 2682 days true 1.46 0%
Sue Kieseker 9/10 2727 days true 1.81 1%
Sandra and Thomas 10/10 2730 days true 1.8 1%
Roux 5/10 2732 days true 1.46 0%
Jackie and Brian 8/10 2734 days true 1.7 0%
Fahl 9/10 2741 days true 1.78 1%
Lisa Blake 7/10 2758 days true 1.59 0%
Megan Child 10/10 2759 days true 1.74 0%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Picton i-SITE Visitor Information Centre does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Final Ranking Score

86%

The final ranking score once rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.