Ranking Score Explained

Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Warrington Reserve.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Nick Morrison's avatar

Nick Morrison

Rankers owner

Warrington Reserve

Valid Reviews

32 Valid Reviews

The Warrington Reserve experience has a total of 33 reviews. There are 32 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Within these 32 valid reviews, the experience has 2 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 32 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 5
9/10 10
8/10 10
7/10 4
6/10 1
5/10 0
4/10 0
3/10 1
2/10 1
1/10 0

80.94% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Warrington Reserve valid reviews is 80.94% and is based on 32 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Weighted Average


Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Liz 8/10 815 days 100%
Georgia 9/10 846 days 89%
Maxime 9/10 874 days 76%
Michael S 9/10 874 days 76%
WideEyedWanderer 6/10 874 days 63%
Dirk Taubner 9/10 905 days 64%
Kevin O'Brien 10/10 905 days 64%
JT 10/10 905 days 64%
Laura Clay 8/10 1180 days 26%
Arne 8/10 1180 days 26%
Robyn Phillips 9/10 1240 days 27%
Meijerelske 10/10 1276 days 26%
Pru Casey 10/10 1279 days 26%
Christine Allgaier 8/10 1576 days 22%
Daniel Andersson 7/10 1603 days 20%
Mark Tyrer 9/10 1604 days 22%
Verena Fendt 10/10 1649 days 22%
Megan Jurgensmeyer 9/10 1669 days 22%
Rosanne van Dooren 9/10 1747 days 21%
Shaun Burns 7/10 1886 days 17%
Elly Edwards 8/10 1900 days 18%
Leonie Brunker 2/10 1918 days 13%
Lily Ong 7/10 1933 days 17%
Goldfinger 8/10 1941 days 17%
john richardson 8/10 2001 days 17%
Jan mentink 8/10 2135 days 15%
Wyklicky 9/10 2280 days 14%
Evelyn 9/10 2335 days 14%
Sander and Eliza Hembrarskamp 7/10 2550 days 10%
Simon Galpin 8/10 2670 days 4%
tracey aylmer 8/10 2672 days 9%
John McAllister 3/10 3399 days -1%


No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Warrington Reserve does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Final Ranking Score


The final ranking score once rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.