Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Warrington Reserve.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
33 Valid Reviews
The Warrington Reserve experience has a total of 34 reviews. There are 33 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Within these 33 valid reviews, the experience has 2 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 33 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 6 |
|
18% |
9/10 | 10 |
|
30% |
8/10 | 10 |
|
30% |
7/10 | 4 |
|
12% |
6/10 | 1 |
|
3% |
5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 1 |
|
3% |
2/10 | 1 |
|
3% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
81.52% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Warrington Reserve valid reviews is 81.52% and is based on 33 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
93.04%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
HYCW | 10/10 | 66 days | 100% |
Liz | 8/10 | 2076 days | 4% |
Georgia | 9/10 | 2107 days | 4% |
Maxime | 9/10 | 2135 days | 4% |
Michael S | 9/10 | 2135 days | 4% |
WideEyedWanderer | 6/10 | 2135 days | 3% |
Dirk Taubner | 9/10 | 2166 days | 4% |
Kevin O'Brien | 10/10 | 2166 days | 4% |
JT | 10/10 | 2166 days | 4% |
Laura Clay | 8/10 | 2441 days | 3% |
Arne | 8/10 | 2441 days | 3% |
Robyn Phillips | 9/10 | 2501 days | 3% |
Meijerelske | 10/10 | 2537 days | 3% |
Pru Casey | 10/10 | 2540 days | 3% |
Christine Allgaier | 8/10 | 2837 days | 2% |
Daniel Andersson | 7/10 | 2864 days | 2% |
Mark Tyrer | 9/10 | 2864 days | 2% |
Verena Fendt | 10/10 | 2910 days | 2% |
Megan Jurgensmeyer | 9/10 | 2930 days | 2% |
Rosanne van Dooren | 9/10 | 3008 days | 2% |
Shaun Burns | 7/10 | 3147 days | 2% |
Elly Edwards | 8/10 | 3161 days | 2% |
Leonie Brunker | 2/10 | 3179 days | 1% |
Lily Ong | 7/10 | 3194 days | 2% |
Goldfinger | 8/10 | 3201 days | 2% |
john richardson | 8/10 | 3261 days | 2% |
Jan mentink | 8/10 | 3396 days | 1% |
Wyklicky | 9/10 | 3541 days | 1% |
Evelyn | 9/10 | 3595 days | 1% |
Sander and Eliza Hembrarskamp | 7/10 | 3811 days | 0% |
Simon Galpin | 8/10 | 3931 days | 0% |
tracey aylmer | 8/10 | 3933 days | 0% |
John McAllister | 3/10 | 4660 days | 0% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Warrington Reserve does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
0.63% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
94%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.