Ranking Score Explained

Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Warrington Reserve.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Nick Morrison's avatar

Nick Morrison

Rankers owner

Warrington Reserve

Valid Reviews

32 Valid Reviews

The Warrington Reserve experience has a total of 33 reviews. There are 32 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Within these 32 valid reviews, the experience has 2 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 32 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 5
9/10 10
8/10 10
7/10 4
6/10 1
5/10 0
4/10 0
3/10 1
2/10 1
1/10 0

80.94% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Warrington Reserve valid reviews is 80.94% and is based on 32 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Weighted Average


Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Liz 8/10 766 days 100%
Georgia 9/10 797 days 90%
Maxime 9/10 825 days 78%
Michael S 9/10 825 days 78%
WideEyedWanderer 6/10 825 days 65%
Dirk Taubner 9/10 856 days 66%
Kevin O'Brien 10/10 856 days 66%
JT 10/10 856 days 66%
Laura Clay 8/10 1131 days 21%
Arne 8/10 1131 days 21%
Robyn Phillips 9/10 1191 days 21%
Meijerelske 10/10 1227 days 21%
Pru Casey 10/10 1230 days 21%
Christine Allgaier 8/10 1527 days 17%
Daniel Andersson 7/10 1554 days 16%
Mark Tyrer 9/10 1555 days 18%
Verena Fendt 10/10 1600 days 17%
Megan Jurgensmeyer 9/10 1620 days 17%
Rosanne van Dooren 9/10 1698 days 16%
Shaun Burns 7/10 1837 days 13%
Elly Edwards 8/10 1851 days 14%
Leonie Brunker 2/10 1869 days 10%
Lily Ong 7/10 1884 days 13%
Goldfinger 8/10 1892 days 14%
john richardson 8/10 1952 days 13%
Jan mentink 8/10 2086 days 12%
Wyklicky 9/10 2231 days 11%
Evelyn 9/10 2286 days 11%
Sander and Eliza Hembrarskamp 7/10 2501 days 8%
Simon Galpin 8/10 2621 days 3%
tracey aylmer 8/10 2623 days 7%
John McAllister 3/10 3350 days -1%


No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Warrington Reserve does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Final Ranking Score


The final ranking score once rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.