Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Awastone.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Awastone
Valid Reviews
49 Valid Reviews
The Awastone experience has a total of 52 reviews. There are 49 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 3 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 49 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 33 |
|
67% |
| 9/10 | 9 |
|
18% |
| 8/10 | 6 |
|
12% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
94.90% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Awastone valid reviews is 94.90% and is based on 49 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Weighted Average
90.94%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sol | 8/10 | 242 days | 100% |
| KL | 8/10 | 517 days | 88% |
| Mark B | 9/10 | 545 days | 87% |
| Nikolaj Brandt | 10/10 | 576 days | 86% |
| Ellie | 10/10 | 607 days | 83% |
| CB | 8/10 | 1276 days | 23% |
| Alastair McQueen | 10/10 | 1368 days | 18% |
| Sue | 10/10 | 1368 days | 18% |
| Andrew Kermode | 10/10 | 1429 days | 15% |
| Laura E | 10/10 | 1733 days | 6% |
| Linda Eagleton | 10/10 | 2006 days | 5% |
| Mary and David NZ | 9/10 | 2372 days | 4% |
| Lisa | 10/10 | 2464 days | 4% |
| Nik | 10/10 | 2678 days | 3% |
| Marty | 6/10 | 2709 days | 3% |
| Jess | 10/10 | 2709 days | 3% |
| Brian Palmer | 10/10 | 2768 days | 3% |
| Nat | 9/10 | 3074 days | 2% |
| Christoph Emch | 10/10 | 3121 days | 2% |
| julie leaver | 10/10 | 3132 days | 2% |
| Liam Gardiner | 9/10 | 3155 days | 2% |
| Maggie Crowe | 10/10 | 3158 days | 2% |
| Pier-Yves Poulin | 10/10 | 3172 days | 2% |
| Michael Ebner | 10/10 | 3174 days | 2% |
| Glenn Hedges | 10/10 | 3224 days | 2% |
| Christoper Crowhurst | 9/10 | 3233 days | 2% |
| Peter Waller | 9/10 | 3237 days | 2% |
| Haidar Mahdi | 10/10 | 3240 days | 2% |
| Bruce May | 10/10 | 3314 days | 2% |
| Sean Cox | 10/10 | 3511 days | 2% |
| Ursula Schoenenberger | 8/10 | 3515 days | 2% |
| Maria Frandsen | 10/10 | 3523 days | 2% |
| Jayma Dancer | 9/10 | 3564 days | 1% |
| Brooke Hammond | 10/10 | 3606 days | 1% |
| Erin Polcyn Sailer | 8/10 | 3753 days | 1% |
| Antoine Greiller | 10/10 | 3827 days | 1% |
| Nick Coulson | 10/10 | 3838 days | 1% |
| Jen Sau | 9/10 | 3925 days | 1% |
| Corry Stucki | 9/10 | 3947 days | 1% |
| Ernest paw | 10/10 | 3955 days | 1% |
| Darlene | 10/10 | 3956 days | 1% |
| Steve | 10/10 | 4228 days | 0% |
| Thomas Blom | 8/10 | 4228 days | 0% |
| exts | 10/10 | 4259 days | 0% |
| Fiona McGregor | 10/10 | 4413 days | 1% |
| Nigel Gee | 10/10 | 4655 days | 1% |
| Bruce Paterson | 10/10 | 4900 days | 1% |
| caravan1 | 10/10 | 4928 days | 1% |
| Shannan Scott | 10/10 | 5051 days | 1% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Awastone experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-2.09% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 123 days. However the Awastone experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Awastone experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -2.06% |
| 198 | -2.07% |
| 199 | -2.08% |
| 200 | -2.09% |
| 201 | -2.10% |
| 202 | -2.12% |
| 203 | -2.13% |
| … | … |
Balancing Adjustment
1.16% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
90%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.