Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Lake Pukaki Overnight Campervan Parking.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
202 Valid Reviews
The Lake Pukaki Overnight Campervan Parking experience has a total of 212 reviews. There are 202 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 10 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 202 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 137 |
|
68% |
9/10 | 37 |
|
18% |
8/10 | 18 |
|
9% |
7/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
6/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 3 |
|
1% |
93.71% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Lake Pukaki Overnight Campervan Parking valid reviews is 93.71% and is based on 202 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
15 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 202 valid reviews, the experience has 15 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 15 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 11 |
|
73% |
9/10 | 4 |
|
27% |
8/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
97.33% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Lake Pukaki Overnight Campervan Parking face-to-face reviews is 97.33% and is based on 15 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
91.18%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Alex | 9/10 | 22 days | 99% |
Jacinta | 9/10 | 22 days | 99% |
Annie Mandelstam | 8/10 | 53 days | 98% |
Jenny | 10/10 | 53 days | 100% |
Paul | 8/10 | 53 days | 98% |
Wolf | 1/10 | 81 days | 40% |
TBKwashere | 10/10 | 112 days | 99% |
Debyron | 9/10 | 112 days | 98% |
Signe | 10/10 | 112 days | 99% |
Sabina | 8/10 | 112 days | 97% |
Rachel | 7/10 | 143 days | 92% |
Emily | 10/10 | 143 days | 99% |
L.L | 9/10 | 143 days | 98% |
Ellie | 9/10 | 204 days | 97% |
Laura | 9/10 | 233 days | 96% |
Stephane | 10/10 | 233 days | 97% |
Charlee d | 10/10 | 264 days | 96% |
Susan | 9/10 | 264 days | 95% |
El and Em | 10/10 | 295 days | 95% |
Caron | 9/10 | 387 days | 91% |
Valg | 7/10 | 387 days | 85% |
Jean | 10/10 | 387 days | 92% |
chen yunchaio | 10/10 | 387 days | 92% |
Ann | 10/10 | 418 days | 90% |
Klaudia Fekete | 9/10 | 418 days | 89% |
Fabienne | 10/10 | 418 days | 90% |
Katie | 8/10 | 447 days | 87% |
Gauthier Poirier | 1/10 | 447 days | 36% |
Jorian | 9/10 | 447 days | 88% |
Nina S. Larsen | 9/10 | 447 days | 88% |
Jamie | 10/10 | 478 days | 87% |
Linda | 10/10 | 478 days | 87% |
Nina | 10/10 | 539 days | 84% |
Marie Perret | 10/10 | 570 days | 82% |
Alex Byrne | 10/10 | 599 days | 80% |
Thestevieniksshow | 9/10 | 599 days | 79% |
Giki | 7/10 | 661 days | 70% |
Laura | 10/10 | 812 days | 62% |
Edwige | 10/10 | 843 days | 59% |
Tom | 10/10 | 843 days | 59% |
Millie Cooper | 10/10 | 874 days | 56% |
Laura | 9/10 | 995 days | 44% |
Jamie | 1/10 | 1026 days | 17% |
Instantly Lost | 10/10 | 1056 days | 39% |
James | 10/10 | 1149 days | 31% |
Valg | 10/10 | 1177 days | 29% |
Brandon | 10/10 | 1239 days | 24% |
Hakuna Matata | 9/10 | 1360 days | 17% |
Seth | 8/10 | 1391 days | 15% |
Alan Mcneil | 10/10 | 1483 days | 11% |
Luke McCallum | 10/10 | 1483 days | 11% |
Kristina | 10/10 | 1483 days | 11% |
The Gillies | 10/10 | 1514 days | 10% |
Alydia | 10/10 | 1542 days | 9% |
Liv | 10/10 | 1573 days | 8% |
me | 9/10 | 1694 days | 6% |
Christopher | 10/10 | 1694 days | 6% |
Thangs | 10/10 | 1879 days | 5% |
Maria | 10/10 | 1879 days | 5% |
Samantha Williamson | 9/10 | 1879 days | 5% |
Lauren | 8/10 | 1879 days | 5% |
Meyana Barnhart | 10/10 | 1908 days | 5% |
Liz Wade | 9/10 | 1938 days | 4% |
Angela | 10/10 | 1939 days | 5% |
Almudena | 10/10 | 1939 days | 5% |
Bek | 10/10 | 1970 days | 4% |
Robert Killey | 7/10 | 1970 days | 4% |
Tanja Rombey | 10/10 | 1970 days | 4% |
Luis Vigil Vidal | 10/10 | 2000 days | 4% |
Corryn Smith | 10/10 | 2000 days | 4% |
Forrest Poirier | 10/10 | 2000 days | 4% |
Javier Williams | 10/10 | 2000 days | 4% |
Chieco Family | 9/10 | 2031 days | 4% |
Steve Mac | 10/10 | 2031 days | 4% |
Ash | 10/10 | 2031 days | 4% |
Shannon | 10/10 | 2031 days | 4% |
kay | 8/10 | 2031 days | 4% |
Marta Jau | 9/10 | 2060 days | 4% |
MimzieTT | 10/10 | 2060 days | 4% |
Andrew Hammond | 10/10 | 2060 days | 4% |
Clément | 10/10 | 2091 days | 4% |
Kendal | 10/10 | 2091 days | 4% |
Tegan | 10/10 | 2091 days | 4% |
Keith & Kay Finlayson | 10/10 | 2091 days | 4% |
Chai | 10/10 | 2122 days | 4% |
Kate | 10/10 | 2183 days | 4% |
Brice | 10/10 | 2214 days | 4% |
Katy | 9/10 | 2214 days | 4% |
Suthep | 10/10 | 2214 days | 4% |
Patrizia Tosetti | 10/10 | 2214 days | 4% |
Amanda | 9/10 | 2245 days | 4% |
GavNads | 10/10 | 2245 days | 4% |
Elin | 10/10 | 2245 days | 4% |
Wazza Schulz | 3/10 | 2245 days | 2% |
Liz | 10/10 | 2245 days | 4% |
Freya | 8/10 | 2273 days | 4% |
Marcus Andrade | 10/10 | 2304 days | 4% |
laura hatton | 10/10 | 2304 days | 4% |
Mitchell | 10/10 | 2334 days | 4% |
Paula G | 8/10 | 2335 days | 4% |
Clarkeoz | 6/10 | 2335 days | 3% |
Sunny | 10/10 | 2365 days | 4% |
Noreasters | 10/10 | 2365 days | 4% |
Angela | 10/10 | 2396 days | 4% |
Eranda | 10/10 | 2396 days | 4% |
Mischa | 10/10 | 2396 days | 4% |
Ellen | 10/10 | 2396 days | 4% |
Becky | 10/10 | 2396 days | 4% |
TT Tang | 9/10 | 2396 days | 4% |
Eddy P | 10/10 | 2425 days | 4% |
Claire Desat | 10/10 | 2425 days | 4% |
Margaret Kajewski | 10/10 | 2425 days | 4% |
Jenna webber | 10/10 | 2425 days | 4% |
Holly Bartholomew | 10/10 | 2425 days | 4% |
J wells | 10/10 | 2425 days | 4% |
Rachel | 8/10 | 2487 days | 3% |
Mike | 10/10 | 2548 days | 3% |
Robin | 10/10 | 2579 days | 3% |
Juliane | 9/10 | 2579 days | 3% |
Florian | 10/10 | 2579 days | 3% |
Mike78 | 10/10 | 2579 days | 3% |
Christina | 10/10 | 2579 days | 3% |
Anna | 10/10 | 2610 days | 3% |
Katherine | 8/10 | 2610 days | 3% |
Mallory | 10/10 | 2610 days | 3% |
Tristan & Jolie | 10/10 | 2610 days | 3% |
Jill Grimwood | 10/10 | 2630 days | 2% |
Jill McGrath | 9/10 | 2633 days | 2% |
Niall McGrath | 10/10 | 2640 days | 3% |
Donna | 10/10 | 2641 days | 3% |
Nick Cartmell | 10/10 | 2643 days | 2% |
Robert Webster | 10/10 | 2647 days | 3% |
Luis Vigil Vidal | 9/10 | 2652 days | 2% |
Tina I | 10/10 | 2700 days | 3% |
Maggie Konstanski | 9/10 | 2701 days | 3% |
Paul and Paula | 8/10 | 2705 days | 3% |
Joe Trigg | 9/10 | 2748 days | 3% |
Phil and Mel Rowson | 9/10 | 2749 days | 3% |
Gary Prescot | 10/10 | 2763 days | 3% |
Tom Sanft | 9/10 | 2893 days | 3% |
Cathy Mead | 10/10 | 2967 days | 3% |
Nikolaj Lambertsen | 10/10 | 2972 days | 3% |
deborah cooper | 8/10 | 2974 days | 2% |
Niels Petit | 10/10 | 2992 days | 2% |
Craig Eagleton | 10/10 | 3008 days | 2% |
Florence Boinay | 10/10 | 3009 days | 2% |
Breanna Alexander | 10/10 | 3023 days | 2% |
Trent O'Keeffe | 10/10 | 3024 days | 2% |
Peter Brock | 10/10 | 3027 days | 2% |
sara hoeflaken | 10/10 | 3031 days | 2% |
Erich Brueggermann | 9/10 | 3032 days | 2% |
CMG | 9/10 | 3033 days | 2% |
The Beans | 10/10 | 3093 days | 2% |
Richard Houghton | 10/10 | 3094 days | 2% |
Jude Ong | 10/10 | 3094 days | 2% |
Alf Caruana | 8/10 | 3095 days | 2% |
Olivia Swisher | 10/10 | 3111 days | 1% |
Dylan McBride | 10/10 | 3111 days | 1% |
Claire | 10/10 | 3111 days | 1% |
Anna Dalby | 10/10 | 3112 days | 1% |
Theo Mallais | 10/10 | 3116 days | 2% |
Derek Drost | 8/10 | 3130 days | 2% |
Kevin Mayer | 10/10 | 3186 days | 2% |
Rita Ashby | 6/10 | 3247 days | 2% |
Pamela Hoffman | 10/10 | 3300 days | 2% |
Justin Caldwell | 10/10 | 3324 days | 2% |
Dennis Page | 10/10 | 3339 days | 2% |
Gilles Andrieu | 8/10 | 3350 days | 2% |
Marina | 10/10 | 3366 days | 2% |
Antonio BENITEZ | 10/10 | 3399 days | 2% |
Richard Kirby | 10/10 | 3430 days | 2% |
Renee Willhuber | 10/10 | 3434 days | 2% |
Antoine Germaine | 9/10 | 3446 days | 2% |
Kaseylee Hibbert | 10/10 | 3465 days | 2% |
Karmen Bond | 10/10 | 3489 days | 1% |
Steve Warren | 10/10 | 3491 days | 1% |
Mitchell Henderson | 8/10 | 3550 days | 1% |
Ian Gilbert | 10/10 | 3613 days | 1% |
Oliver Pester | 10/10 | 3705 days | 1% |
Andrew Jones | 10/10 | 3705 days | 1% |
Mike Merrick | 9/10 | 3713 days | 1% |
Averil Brown | 10/10 | 3731 days | 1% |
Nell Hearle | 10/10 | 3741 days | 1% |
Patrick Schwerhoff | 10/10 | 3758 days | 1% |
Manolis Pavlakis | 10/10 | 3764 days | 1% |
sreve | 10/10 | 3795 days | 1% |
Ron Clarke | 10/10 | 3795 days | 1% |
Alexandre Moleiro | 10/10 | 3795 days | 1% |
John Scott | 10/10 | 3806 days | 0% |
silvia | 8/10 | 3856 days | 1% |
Kane F | 10/10 | 3886 days | 1% |
Scott Atkinson | 10/10 | 3948 days | 1% |
Andrew Kermode | 10/10 | 3948 days | 1% |
Tom Guthknecht | 9/10 | 4033 days | 0% |
Matt Weston | 10/10 | 4054 days | 0% |
tracey aylmer | 9/10 | 4071 days | 0% |
Saskia | 10/10 | 4097 days | 0% |
Julian Kemp | 9/10 | 4191 days | 0% |
Karen Perry | 10/10 | 4251 days | 0% |
Fernando Martin | 9/10 | 4443 days | 0% |
Tinne Cis | 10/10 | 4798 days | 0% |
Chris Marsh | 10/10 | 4827 days | 0% |
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Lake Pukaki Overnight Campervan Parking does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
0.85% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
92%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.