Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Orton Bradley Park Camping.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at firstname.lastname@example.org. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
17 Valid Reviews
The Orton Bradley Park Camping experience has a total of 17 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Within these 17 valid reviews, the experience has 2 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 17 valid reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Orton Bradley Park Camping valid reviews is 89.41% and is based on 17 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
|Steve h||10/10||999 days||6%|
|Emilie Stelling||3/10||1150 days||4%|
|Paul and Paula||8/10||1505 days||4%|
|Lynn Whiteside||10/10||1536 days||4%|
|Dave Farmer||8/10||1707 days||4%|
|Jonathan Juckett||10/10||2173 days||3%|
|Sarah Gurney||9/10||2242 days||3%|
|Cara Ingram||8/10||2245 days||3%|
|Soizic Vandermeersch||8/10||2482 days||2%|
|Michal Bebjak||8/10||2539 days||2%|
|Jesper Sonderris||10/10||2593 days||2%|
|Emily Kirkley||10/10||2597 days||2%|
|Emma Wallace||10/10||2920 days||1%|
|Peter Eskau||10/10||3310 days||1%|
|R Seiferling||10/10||3637 days||0%|
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Orton Bradley Park Camping does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
The final ranking score once rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at email@example.com.