Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Lindis Pass Historic Hotel Campsite.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Lindis Pass Historic Hotel Campsite
Valid Reviews
43 Valid Reviews
The Lindis Pass Historic Hotel Campsite experience has a total of 43 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 43 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 8 |
|
19% |
| 9/10 | 14 |
|
33% |
| 8/10 | 10 |
|
23% |
| 7/10 | 6 |
|
14% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 2 |
|
5% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
80.47% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Lindis Pass Historic Hotel Campsite valid reviews is 80.47% and is based on 43 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
6 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 43 valid reviews, the experience has 6 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 6 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 9/10 | 3 |
|
50% |
| 8/10 | 2 |
|
33% |
| 7/10 | 1 |
|
17% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
83.33% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Lindis Pass Historic Hotel Campsite face-to-face reviews is 83.33% and is based on 6 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
80.28%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Peter Frew | 9/10 | 19 days | 100% |
| JD | 5/10 | 233 days | 75% |
| moondancer | 10/10 | 354 days | 94% |
| Lauren | 7/10 | 477 days | 82% |
| Laura | 10/10 | 719 days | 71% |
| Gee Gee | 9/10 | 719 days | 71% |
| Lauren | 8/10 | 719 days | 70% |
| Nida | 3/10 | 750 days | 37% |
| Esther | 8/10 | 750 days | 67% |
| John Sanders | 9/10 | 1115 days | 34% |
| Steph | 1/10 | 1207 days | 11% |
| ThatJasonR | 8/10 | 1480 days | 12% |
| Roo | 6/10 | 1541 days | 8% |
| Mike | 10/10 | 1572 days | 9% |
| Aaron | 10/10 | 1664 days | 6% |
| Linda | 9/10 | 1786 days | 5% |
| Maria | 10/10 | 1815 days | 5% |
| Dinda K. | 9/10 | 1846 days | 5% |
| Wei | 9/10 | 1877 days | 5% |
| Cor Dekker | 9/10 | 1907 days | 5% |
| Nicky Westlake | 10/10 | 2152 days | 4% |
| QueeenBeee | 9/10 | 2180 days | 4% |
| Inna | 7/10 | 2211 days | 4% |
| Jennifer | 10/10 | 2211 days | 4% |
| Boris Clémençon | 10/10 | 2211 days | 4% |
| Pierre et Nathalie | 3/10 | 2242 days | 2% |
| Charlesbrooksphotographer | 7/10 | 2456 days | 3% |
| Robyn Phillips | 8/10 | 2546 days | 3% |
| Katy Coutts | 7/10 | 2771 days | 3% |
| Lucile Gendre | 8/10 | 2836 days | 3% |
| Roger | 9/10 | 2837 days | 3% |
| Kathy Hart | 9/10 | 3186 days | 2% |
| Brian Stelbotsky | 8/10 | 3187 days | 2% |
| R Taylor | 9/10 | 3484 days | 2% |
| Alistair Millward | 7/10 | 3609 days | 1% |
| Bert Gielen | 8/10 | 3644 days | 1% |
| Holger Butenschon | 9/10 | 4030 days | 0% |
| Mycall | 8/10 | 4312 days | 0% |
| Giles Leonard | 8/10 | 4325 days | 0% |
| Sian Bolderson | 9/10 | 4326 days | 0% |
| Eric | 7/10 | 4348 days | 0% |
| Rogier Ramaker | 9/10 | 4348 days | 0% |
| Kevin Morris | 8/10 | 5046 days | 1% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Lindis Pass Historic Hotel Campsite does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
2.92% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
83%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.