Ranking Score Explained

Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Coes Ford Camping Ground.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Nick Morrison's avatar

Nick Morrison

Rankers owner

Coes Ford Camping Ground

Valid Reviews

35 Valid Reviews

The Coes Ford Camping Ground experience has a total of 36 reviews. There are 35 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Within these 35 valid reviews, the experience has 1 face-to-face review collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 35 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 9
9/10 6
8/10 8
7/10 5
6/10 1
5/10 2
4/10 2
3/10 1
2/10 0
1/10 1

77.43% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Coes Ford Camping Ground valid reviews is 77.43% and is based on 35 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Weighted Average


Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Wai wai 7/10 7 days 91%
JuneC 10/10 66 days 100%
Kaukau 10/10 493 days 61%
K&J 9/10 493 days 61%
Chieco Family 3/10 524 days 43%
jasper 5/10 585 days 36%
Jackie Sue 7/10 797 days 16%
Aleisha 5/10 797 days 14%
Daniel P 10/10 828 days 15%
Pheng Taing 10/10 1437 days 2%
Matthieu Berdugo 8/10 1440 days 2%
Hamish 1/10 1527 days 1%
estelle D 6/10 1558 days 1%
Megan Jurgensmeyer 9/10 1561 days 2%
Sue Horstra 9/10 1564 days 2%
Eric Pollard 8/10 1654 days 2%
Emma Stiles 9/10 1724 days 2%
mirimirik 4/10 1745 days 1%
Brian Stelbotsky 9/10 1775 days 2%
Shaun Burns 4/10 1785 days 1%
Georg H. 9/10 1830 days 2%
Tony Maroulis 10/10 1843 days 2%
Ed Linklater 7/10 1845 days 1%
Jamie McLauchlan 8/10 1890 days 1%
Suzanne Vermeulen 8/10 1954 days 1%
Kevin Chen 8/10 1985 days 1%
Bob Fontaine 8/10 1992 days 1%
Charlotte Cooper 8/10 1994 days 1%
craig hatherly 8/10 2015 days 1%
Evangeline Chua 10/10 2091 days 1%
James Webster 10/10 2154 days 1%
Wyklicky 7/10 2172 days 1%
Andrew B 10/10 2350 days 1%
Claudia 10/10 2380 days 0%
Tom Guthknecht 7/10 2527 days -1%


No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Coes Ford Camping Ground does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Final Ranking Score


The final ranking score once rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.