Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Coes Ford Camping Ground.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Coes Ford Camping Ground
Valid Reviews
64 Valid Reviews
The Coes Ford Camping Ground experience has a total of 68 reviews. There are 64 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 4 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Within these 64 valid reviews, the experience has 1 face-to-face review collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 64 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 21 |
|
33% |
| 9/10 | 9 |
|
14% |
| 8/10 | 13 |
|
20% |
| 7/10 | 10 |
|
16% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 3 |
|
5% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 4 |
|
6% |
78.28% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Coes Ford Camping Ground valid reviews is 78.28% and is based on 64 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Weighted Average
86.04%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Natalia | 10/10 | 121 days | 100% |
| Cammie | 7/10 | 152 days | 93% |
| Segorbt | 8/10 | 180 days | 97% |
| Caren | 8/10 | 180 days | 97% |
| Kirsty | 10/10 | 180 days | 99% |
| Jean | 10/10 | 303 days | 96% |
| Laura | 8/10 | 576 days | 80% |
| Sarah Kot | 7/10 | 576 days | 76% |
| Patrick Tenbeth | 10/10 | 576 days | 82% |
| Berdien | 10/10 | 607 days | 80% |
| Phil | 7/10 | 637 days | 72% |
| Sabrina Bouchard | 10/10 | 1003 days | 44% |
| Liz | 10/10 | 1156 days | 31% |
| Ricky | 7/10 | 1187 days | 26% |
| Andrea | 5/10 | 1187 days | 22% |
| Matthew C | 7/10 | 1187 days | 26% |
| Jodie Muller | 10/10 | 1187 days | 28% |
| Orla | 1/10 | 1187 days | 11% |
| FitzHanss | 9/10 | 1217 days | 26% |
| Carrie | 9/10 | 1248 days | 24% |
| Hannah | 10/10 | 1276 days | 22% |
| Brigette | 9/10 | 1307 days | 20% |
| Stacey & Mike | 8/10 | 1307 days | 20% |
| Amanda Moreira | 10/10 | 1307 days | 20% |
| Geert Alkema | 10/10 | 1338 days | 19% |
| Jonny | 8/10 | 1552 days | 9% |
| Rosie | 1/10 | 1613 days | 3% |
| Digger operator | 1/10 | 1764 days | 2% |
| Patricia | 10/10 | 1947 days | 5% |
| Wai wai | 7/10 | 1978 days | 4% |
| JuneC | 10/10 | 2037 days | 5% |
| Kaukau | 10/10 | 2464 days | 4% |
| K&J | 9/10 | 2464 days | 4% |
| Chieco Family | 3/10 | 2495 days | 2% |
| jasper | 5/10 | 2556 days | 3% |
| Jackie Sue | 7/10 | 2768 days | 3% |
| Aleisha | 5/10 | 2768 days | 2% |
| Daniel P | 10/10 | 2799 days | 3% |
| Pheng Taing | 10/10 | 3407 days | 2% |
| Matthieu Berdugo | 8/10 | 3411 days | 2% |
| Hamish | 1/10 | 3497 days | 1% |
| estelle D | 6/10 | 3528 days | 1% |
| Megan Jurgensmeyer | 9/10 | 3532 days | 2% |
| Sue Horstra | 9/10 | 3535 days | 2% |
| Eric Pollard | 8/10 | 3625 days | 1% |
| Emma Stiles | 9/10 | 3695 days | 1% |
| mirimirik | 4/10 | 3716 days | 1% |
| Brian Stelbotsky | 9/10 | 3746 days | 1% |
| Shaun Burns | 4/10 | 3756 days | 1% |
| Georg H. | 9/10 | 3801 days | 1% |
| Tony Maroulis | 10/10 | 3814 days | 1% |
| Ed Linklater | 7/10 | 3816 days | 1% |
| Jamie McLauchlan | 8/10 | 3861 days | 1% |
| Suzanne Vermeulen | 8/10 | 3924 days | 1% |
| Kevin Chen | 8/10 | 3956 days | 1% |
| Bob Fontaine | 8/10 | 3963 days | 1% |
| Charlotte Cooper | 8/10 | 3965 days | 1% |
| craig hatherly | 8/10 | 3986 days | 1% |
| Evangeline Chua | 10/10 | 4062 days | 1% |
| James Webster | 10/10 | 4125 days | 0% |
| Wyklicky | 7/10 | 4143 days | 0% |
| Andrew B | 10/10 | 4320 days | 0% |
| Claudia | 10/10 | 4350 days | 0% |
| Tom Guthknecht | 7/10 | 4498 days | 0% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Coes Ford Camping Ground does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
1.63% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
88%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.