Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Coes Ford Camping Ground.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Coes Ford Camping Ground
Valid Reviews
64 Valid Reviews
The Coes Ford Camping Ground experience has a total of 68 reviews. There are 64 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 4 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Within these 64 valid reviews, the experience has 1 face-to-face review collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 64 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 21 |
|
33% |
| 9/10 | 9 |
|
14% |
| 8/10 | 13 |
|
20% |
| 7/10 | 10 |
|
16% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 3 |
|
5% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 4 |
|
6% |
78.28% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Coes Ford Camping Ground valid reviews is 78.28% and is based on 64 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Weighted Average
86.03%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Natalia | 10/10 | 111 days | 100% |
| Cammie | 7/10 | 142 days | 93% |
| Segorbt | 8/10 | 170 days | 97% |
| Caren | 8/10 | 170 days | 97% |
| Kirsty | 10/10 | 170 days | 99% |
| Jean | 10/10 | 293 days | 96% |
| Laura | 8/10 | 566 days | 81% |
| Sarah Kot | 7/10 | 566 days | 77% |
| Patrick Tenbeth | 10/10 | 566 days | 82% |
| Berdien | 10/10 | 597 days | 80% |
| Phil | 7/10 | 627 days | 73% |
| Sabrina Bouchard | 10/10 | 993 days | 45% |
| Liz | 10/10 | 1146 days | 31% |
| Ricky | 7/10 | 1177 days | 27% |
| Andrea | 5/10 | 1177 days | 22% |
| Matthew C | 7/10 | 1177 days | 27% |
| Jodie Muller | 10/10 | 1177 days | 29% |
| Orla | 1/10 | 1177 days | 12% |
| FitzHanss | 9/10 | 1207 days | 27% |
| Carrie | 9/10 | 1238 days | 25% |
| Hannah | 10/10 | 1266 days | 23% |
| Brigette | 9/10 | 1297 days | 21% |
| Stacey & Mike | 8/10 | 1297 days | 21% |
| Amanda Moreira | 10/10 | 1297 days | 21% |
| Geert Alkema | 10/10 | 1328 days | 19% |
| Jonny | 8/10 | 1542 days | 9% |
| Rosie | 1/10 | 1603 days | 3% |
| Digger operator | 1/10 | 1754 days | 2% |
| Patricia | 10/10 | 1937 days | 5% |
| Wai wai | 7/10 | 1968 days | 4% |
| JuneC | 10/10 | 2027 days | 5% |
| Kaukau | 10/10 | 2454 days | 4% |
| K&J | 9/10 | 2454 days | 4% |
| Chieco Family | 3/10 | 2485 days | 2% |
| jasper | 5/10 | 2546 days | 3% |
| Jackie Sue | 7/10 | 2758 days | 3% |
| Aleisha | 5/10 | 2758 days | 2% |
| Daniel P | 10/10 | 2789 days | 3% |
| Pheng Taing | 10/10 | 3397 days | 2% |
| Matthieu Berdugo | 8/10 | 3401 days | 2% |
| Hamish | 1/10 | 3487 days | 1% |
| estelle D | 6/10 | 3518 days | 1% |
| Megan Jurgensmeyer | 9/10 | 3522 days | 2% |
| Sue Horstra | 9/10 | 3525 days | 2% |
| Eric Pollard | 8/10 | 3615 days | 1% |
| Emma Stiles | 9/10 | 3685 days | 1% |
| mirimirik | 4/10 | 3706 days | 1% |
| Brian Stelbotsky | 9/10 | 3736 days | 1% |
| Shaun Burns | 4/10 | 3746 days | 1% |
| Georg H. | 9/10 | 3791 days | 1% |
| Tony Maroulis | 10/10 | 3804 days | 1% |
| Ed Linklater | 7/10 | 3806 days | 1% |
| Jamie McLauchlan | 8/10 | 3851 days | 1% |
| Suzanne Vermeulen | 8/10 | 3914 days | 1% |
| Kevin Chen | 8/10 | 3946 days | 1% |
| Bob Fontaine | 8/10 | 3953 days | 1% |
| Charlotte Cooper | 8/10 | 3955 days | 1% |
| craig hatherly | 8/10 | 3976 days | 1% |
| Evangeline Chua | 10/10 | 4052 days | 1% |
| James Webster | 10/10 | 4115 days | 0% |
| Wyklicky | 7/10 | 4133 days | 0% |
| Andrew B | 10/10 | 4310 days | 0% |
| Claudia | 10/10 | 4340 days | 0% |
| Tom Guthknecht | 7/10 | 4488 days | 0% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Coes Ford Camping Ground does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
1.63% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
88%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.