Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Coes Ford Camping Ground.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Coes Ford Camping Ground
Valid Reviews
59 Valid Reviews
The Coes Ford Camping Ground experience has a total of 63 reviews. There are 59 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 4 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Within these 59 valid reviews, the experience has 1 face-to-face review collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 59 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 19 |
|
32% |
| 9/10 | 9 |
|
15% |
| 8/10 | 11 |
|
19% |
| 7/10 | 9 |
|
15% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 3 |
|
5% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 4 |
|
7% |
77.63% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Coes Ford Camping Ground valid reviews is 77.63% and is based on 59 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Weighted Average
85.60%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jean | 10/10 | 140 days | 100% |
| Laura | 8/10 | 413 days | 89% |
| Sarah Kot | 7/10 | 413 days | 85% |
| Patrick Tenbeth | 10/10 | 413 days | 91% |
| Berdien | 10/10 | 444 days | 90% |
| Phil | 7/10 | 474 days | 82% |
| Sabrina Bouchard | 10/10 | 840 days | 60% |
| Liz | 10/10 | 993 days | 45% |
| Ricky | 7/10 | 1024 days | 39% |
| Andrea | 5/10 | 1024 days | 32% |
| Matthew C | 7/10 | 1024 days | 39% |
| Jodie Muller | 10/10 | 1024 days | 42% |
| Orla | 1/10 | 1024 days | 17% |
| FitzHanss | 9/10 | 1054 days | 39% |
| Carrie | 9/10 | 1085 days | 36% |
| Hannah | 10/10 | 1113 days | 34% |
| Brigette | 9/10 | 1144 days | 31% |
| Stacey & Mike | 8/10 | 1144 days | 31% |
| Amanda Moreira | 10/10 | 1144 days | 32% |
| Geert Alkema | 10/10 | 1175 days | 29% |
| Jonny | 8/10 | 1389 days | 16% |
| Rosie | 1/10 | 1450 days | 5% |
| Digger operator | 1/10 | 1601 days | 3% |
| Patricia | 10/10 | 1784 days | 5% |
| Wai wai | 7/10 | 1815 days | 5% |
| JuneC | 10/10 | 1874 days | 5% |
| Kaukau | 10/10 | 2301 days | 4% |
| K&J | 9/10 | 2301 days | 4% |
| Chieco Family | 3/10 | 2332 days | 2% |
| jasper | 5/10 | 2393 days | 3% |
| Jackie Sue | 7/10 | 2605 days | 3% |
| Aleisha | 5/10 | 2605 days | 3% |
| Daniel P | 10/10 | 2636 days | 3% |
| Pheng Taing | 10/10 | 3245 days | 2% |
| Matthieu Berdugo | 8/10 | 3248 days | 2% |
| Hamish | 1/10 | 3335 days | 1% |
| estelle D | 6/10 | 3366 days | 2% |
| Megan Jurgensmeyer | 9/10 | 3369 days | 2% |
| Sue Horstra | 9/10 | 3372 days | 2% |
| Eric Pollard | 8/10 | 3462 days | 2% |
| Emma Stiles | 9/10 | 3532 days | 2% |
| mirimirik | 4/10 | 3553 days | 1% |
| Brian Stelbotsky | 9/10 | 3583 days | 1% |
| Shaun Burns | 4/10 | 3593 days | 1% |
| Georg H. | 9/10 | 3638 days | 1% |
| Tony Maroulis | 10/10 | 3651 days | 1% |
| Ed Linklater | 7/10 | 3653 days | 1% |
| Jamie McLauchlan | 8/10 | 3698 days | 1% |
| Suzanne Vermeulen | 8/10 | 3762 days | 1% |
| Kevin Chen | 8/10 | 3793 days | 1% |
| Bob Fontaine | 8/10 | 3800 days | 1% |
| Charlotte Cooper | 8/10 | 3802 days | 1% |
| craig hatherly | 8/10 | 3823 days | 1% |
| Evangeline Chua | 10/10 | 3899 days | 1% |
| James Webster | 10/10 | 3962 days | 1% |
| Wyklicky | 7/10 | 3980 days | 1% |
| Andrew B | 10/10 | 4158 days | 0% |
| Claudia | 10/10 | 4188 days | 0% |
| Tom Guthknecht | 7/10 | 4335 days | 0% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Coes Ford Camping Ground does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
1.71% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
87%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.