Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Coes Ford Camping Ground.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Coes Ford Camping Ground
Valid Reviews
64 Valid Reviews
The Coes Ford Camping Ground experience has a total of 68 reviews. There are 64 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 4 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Within these 64 valid reviews, the experience has 1 face-to-face review collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 64 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 21 |
|
33% |
| 9/10 | 9 |
|
14% |
| 8/10 | 13 |
|
20% |
| 7/10 | 10 |
|
16% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 3 |
|
5% |
| 4/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 4 |
|
6% |
78.28% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Coes Ford Camping Ground valid reviews is 78.28% and is based on 64 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Weighted Average
86.17%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Natalia | 10/10 | 221 days | 100% |
| Cammie | 7/10 | 252 days | 92% |
| Segorbt | 8/10 | 280 days | 96% |
| Caren | 8/10 | 280 days | 96% |
| Kirsty | 10/10 | 280 days | 98% |
| Jean | 10/10 | 403 days | 93% |
| Laura | 8/10 | 676 days | 74% |
| Sarah Kot | 7/10 | 676 days | 71% |
| Patrick Tenbeth | 10/10 | 676 days | 76% |
| Berdien | 10/10 | 707 days | 73% |
| Phil | 7/10 | 737 days | 66% |
| Sabrina Bouchard | 10/10 | 1103 days | 36% |
| Liz | 10/10 | 1256 days | 24% |
| Ricky | 7/10 | 1287 days | 20% |
| Andrea | 5/10 | 1287 days | 17% |
| Matthew C | 7/10 | 1287 days | 20% |
| Jodie Muller | 10/10 | 1287 days | 22% |
| Orla | 1/10 | 1287 days | 9% |
| FitzHanss | 9/10 | 1317 days | 20% |
| Carrie | 9/10 | 1348 days | 18% |
| Hannah | 10/10 | 1376 days | 17% |
| Brigette | 9/10 | 1407 days | 15% |
| Stacey & Mike | 8/10 | 1407 days | 15% |
| Amanda Moreira | 10/10 | 1407 days | 15% |
| Geert Alkema | 10/10 | 1438 days | 14% |
| Jonny | 8/10 | 1652 days | 7% |
| Rosie | 1/10 | 1713 days | 2% |
| Digger operator | 1/10 | 1864 days | 2% |
| Patricia | 10/10 | 2047 days | 4% |
| Wai wai | 7/10 | 2078 days | 4% |
| JuneC | 10/10 | 2137 days | 4% |
| Kaukau | 10/10 | 2564 days | 3% |
| K&J | 9/10 | 2564 days | 3% |
| Chieco Family | 3/10 | 2595 days | 2% |
| jasper | 5/10 | 2656 days | 2% |
| Jackie Sue | 7/10 | 2868 days | 3% |
| Aleisha | 5/10 | 2868 days | 2% |
| Daniel P | 10/10 | 2899 days | 3% |
| Pheng Taing | 10/10 | 3508 days | 2% |
| Matthieu Berdugo | 8/10 | 3511 days | 1% |
| Hamish | 1/10 | 3598 days | 0% |
| estelle D | 6/10 | 3629 days | 1% |
| Megan Jurgensmeyer | 9/10 | 3632 days | 1% |
| Sue Horstra | 9/10 | 3635 days | 1% |
| Eric Pollard | 8/10 | 3725 days | 1% |
| Emma Stiles | 9/10 | 3795 days | 1% |
| mirimirik | 4/10 | 3816 days | 0% |
| Brian Stelbotsky | 9/10 | 3846 days | 1% |
| Shaun Burns | 4/10 | 3856 days | 0% |
| Georg H. | 9/10 | 3901 days | 1% |
| Tony Maroulis | 10/10 | 3914 days | 1% |
| Ed Linklater | 7/10 | 3916 days | 1% |
| Jamie McLauchlan | 8/10 | 3961 days | 1% |
| Suzanne Vermeulen | 8/10 | 4025 days | 0% |
| Kevin Chen | 8/10 | 4056 days | 0% |
| Bob Fontaine | 8/10 | 4063 days | 0% |
| Charlotte Cooper | 8/10 | 4065 days | 0% |
| craig hatherly | 8/10 | 4086 days | 0% |
| Evangeline Chua | 10/10 | 4162 days | 0% |
| James Webster | 10/10 | 4225 days | 0% |
| Wyklicky | 7/10 | 4243 days | 0% |
| Andrew B | 10/10 | 4421 days | 1% |
| Claudia | 10/10 | 4451 days | 1% |
| Tom Guthknecht | 7/10 | 4598 days | 0% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Coes Ford Camping Ground does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
1.60% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
88%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.