Ranking Score Explained

Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Little Waipa Reserve.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Little Waipa Reserve

Valid Reviews

58 Valid Reviews

The Little Waipa Reserve experience has a total of 60 reviews. There are 58 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Within these 58 valid reviews, the experience has 2 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 58 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 24
41%
9/10 13
22%
8/10 6
10%
7/10 8
14%
6/10 3
5%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 2
3%
3/10 1
2%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 1
2%

84.66% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Little Waipa Reserve valid reviews is 84.66% and is based on 58 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Weighted Average

86.49%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Kim Schindelmann 10/10 18 days 100%
Rebecca P 8/10 171 days 96%
Simon 9/10 201 days 97%
Elk 8/10 352 days 91%
Ersin 9/10 383 days 91%
Louise 10/10 627 days 78%
Trevor 4/10 658 days 49%
Doriane 9/10 687 days 72%
Jade Ballantine 10/10 749 days 68%
Jost 10/10 749 days 68%
Mandy 10/10 749 days 68%
117izy 6/10 779 days 56%
Maartje 8/10 840 days 59%
Benjamin 9/10 840 days 59%
Matthew 8/10 871 days 56%
RM 9/10 932 days 50%
Paul 10/10 963 days 47%
Nicolas 7/10 1052 days 36%
Nikos 8/10 1052 days 38%
Louisa Runge 7/10 1052 days 36%
Janae c 7/10 1083 days 34%
Lukyzee 9/10 1083 days 36%
GRANMA 10/10 1144 days 31%
Max maxwell 10/10 1448 days 13%
Olga 7/10 1448 days 12%
Time Out 9/10 1905 days 5%
Allen Goodall 10/10 2179 days 4%
Rod Brown 10/10 2485 days 4%
John Plane 10/10 2544 days 4%
Roland Hänni 8/10 2575 days 3%
Alyson Reid 7/10 2892 days 3%
Haley Everitt 3/10 3137 days 1%
Helen Quirk 9/10 3238 days 2%
Alison Males 4/10 3272 days 1%
Mark 10/10 3274 days 2%
Maaike Goudriaan 10/10 3274 days 2%
Michelle Smit 10/10 3458 days 2%
Lauren Smith 10/10 3477 days 2%
Denise Farr 10/10 3481 days 2%
Wiola and Nico 1/10 3502 days 1%
Trent Davis 9/10 3540 days 2%
Fernando Silva 9/10 3551 days 2%
Tony Maroulis 10/10 3606 days 1%
Vernesa Smolcic 10/10 3634 days 1%
Bryant Faaola 7/10 3640 days 1%
Miaomace 10/10 3677 days 1%
Victoria 10/10 3732 days 1%
Miguel 9/10 3946 days 1%
Ines 7/10 3977 days 1%
John Treasure 6/10 4339 days 0%
Jordan and Marielle 10/10 4370 days 0%
arnaud paquet 10/10 4462 days 1%
Rosa Fossi 10/10 4492 days 1%
Memain 7/10 4642 days 1%
Konza 6/10 4643 days 0%
Clive 9/10 4704 days 1%
Andrew K 10/10 4735 days 1%
hoppy 9/10 4735 days 1%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Little Waipa Reserve does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

1.54% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

88%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.