Ranking Score Explained
Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Moray Terrace.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Moray Terrace
Valid Reviews
39 Valid Reviews
The Moray Terrace experience has a total of 40 reviews. There are 39 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 39 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 12 |
|
31% |
| 9/10 | 11 |
|
28% |
| 8/10 | 4 |
|
10% |
| 7/10 | 11 |
|
28% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
3% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
85.38% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Moray Terrace valid reviews is 85.38% and is based on 39 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Weighted Average
91.15%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Alydia | 9/10 | 73 days | 100% |
| Caravan Fever | 10/10 | 73 days | 100% |
| Valg | 9/10 | 73 days | 100% |
| Jo | 10/10 | 135 days | 98% |
| Magenta Thompson | 9/10 | 165 days | 96% |
| KEIZ | 10/10 | 288 days | 88% |
| Sandra Forstner | 7/10 | 439 days | 63% |
| Guru | 10/10 | 623 days | 40% |
| Flying Kiwi | 9/10 | 715 days | 28% |
| Pat Burns | 7/10 | 776 days | 19% |
| WideEyedWanderer | 7/10 | 804 days | 16% |
| Lennart | 10/10 | 835 days | 15% |
| Rugby | 9/10 | 927 days | 9% |
| Cynthia | 10/10 | 927 days | 9% |
| Sarah | 10/10 | 927 days | 9% |
| Sue | 9/10 | 1019 days | 5% |
| TRISH | 10/10 | 1080 days | 4% |
| H Swinkels | 9/10 | 1191 days | 4% |
| Sandra Jeffers | 8/10 | 1277 days | 4% |
| Phil and Mel Rowson | 7/10 | 1280 days | 4% |
| Chloe McKee | 9/10 | 1362 days | 4% |
| Linc | 8/10 | 1453 days | 3% |
| Harriet Smith | 5/10 | 1503 days | 3% |
| Joan and Sam | 9/10 | 1530 days | 3% |
| sara hoeflaken | 7/10 | 1562 days | 3% |
| Sander Schouwenaar | 7/10 | 1603 days | 3% |
| Tatiana Rochereau | 7/10 | 1830 days | 3% |
| Elizabeth Kerjeux | 10/10 | 1861 days | 3% |
| Lena Wesselink | 7/10 | 1891 days | 2% |
| Werner S | 9/10 | 1919 days | 3% |
| Neville Smith | 8/10 | 1974 days | 2% |
| Soizic Vandermeersch | 7/10 | 2198 days | 2% |
| Wyklicky | 9/10 | 2210 days | 2% |
| Mike Merrick | 10/10 | 2244 days | 2% |
| Daniel Jarrett | 7/10 | 2388 days | 2% |
| Claudia | 10/10 | 2418 days | 2% |
| Mike Fricker | 7/10 | 2571 days | 1% |
| Andrew Potratz | 10/10 | 2753 days | 1% |
| Lindsay Berquist | 8/10 | 3271 days | 0% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Moray Terrace does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Final Ranking Score
91%
The final ranking score once rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.