Ranking Score Explained
Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Moray Terrace.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Moray Terrace
Valid Reviews
40 Valid Reviews
The Moray Terrace experience has a total of 41 reviews. There are 40 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 40 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 12 |
|
30% |
| 9/10 | 11 |
|
28% |
| 8/10 | 5 |
|
13% |
| 7/10 | 11 |
|
28% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
3% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
85.25% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Moray Terrace valid reviews is 85.25% and is based on 40 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Weighted Average
89.81%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Suzanne | 8/10 | 472 days | 100% |
| Alydia | 9/10 | 561 days | 81% |
| Caravan Fever | 10/10 | 561 days | 81% |
| Valg | 9/10 | 561 days | 81% |
| Jo | 10/10 | 623 days | 65% |
| Magenta Thompson | 9/10 | 653 days | 58% |
| KEIZ | 10/10 | 776 days | 34% |
| Sandra Forstner | 7/10 | 927 days | 13% |
| Guru | 10/10 | 1111 days | 7% |
| Flying Kiwi | 9/10 | 1203 days | 7% |
| Pat Burns | 7/10 | 1264 days | 6% |
| WideEyedWanderer | 7/10 | 1292 days | 6% |
| Lennart | 10/10 | 1323 days | 6% |
| Rugby | 9/10 | 1415 days | 6% |
| Cynthia | 10/10 | 1415 days | 6% |
| Sarah | 10/10 | 1415 days | 6% |
| Sue | 9/10 | 1507 days | 6% |
| TRISH | 10/10 | 1568 days | 5% |
| H Swinkels | 9/10 | 1679 days | 5% |
| Sandra Jeffers | 8/10 | 1765 days | 4% |
| Phil and Mel Rowson | 7/10 | 1768 days | 4% |
| Chloe McKee | 9/10 | 1850 days | 4% |
| Linc | 8/10 | 1941 days | 4% |
| Harriet Smith | 5/10 | 1991 days | 3% |
| Joan and Sam | 9/10 | 2018 days | 4% |
| sara hoeflaken | 7/10 | 2050 days | 3% |
| Sander Schouwenaar | 7/10 | 2091 days | 3% |
| Tatiana Rochereau | 7/10 | 2318 days | 3% |
| Elizabeth Kerjeux | 10/10 | 2349 days | 3% |
| Lena Wesselink | 7/10 | 2379 days | 2% |
| Werner S | 9/10 | 2407 days | 3% |
| Neville Smith | 8/10 | 2462 days | 2% |
| Soizic Vandermeersch | 7/10 | 2686 days | 2% |
| Wyklicky | 9/10 | 2698 days | 2% |
| Mike Merrick | 10/10 | 2732 days | 2% |
| Daniel Jarrett | 7/10 | 2875 days | 1% |
| Claudia | 10/10 | 2905 days | 1% |
| Mike Fricker | 7/10 | 3059 days | 0% |
| Andrew Potratz | 10/10 | 3241 days | 0% |
| Lindsay Berquist | 8/10 | 3759 days | 0% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Moray Terrace does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Final Ranking Score
90%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.