Ranking Score Explained
Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Lake Pukaki Overnight Campervan Parking.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Nick Morrison
Rankers owner
Lake Pukaki Overnight Campervan Parking
Valid Reviews
125 Valid Reviews
The Lake Pukaki Overnight Campervan Parking experience has a total of 129 reviews. There are 125 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 4 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 125 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 65 |
|
52% |
| 9/10 | 29 |
|
23% |
| 8/10 | 22 |
|
18% |
| 7/10 | 8 |
|
6% |
| 6/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
91.92% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Lake Pukaki Overnight Campervan Parking valid reviews is 91.92% and is based on 125 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
39 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 125 valid reviews, the experience has 39 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 39 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 16 |
|
41% |
| 9/10 | 10 |
|
26% |
| 8/10 | 10 |
|
26% |
| 7/10 | 3 |
|
8% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
90.00% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Lake Pukaki Overnight Campervan Parking face-to-face reviews is 90.00% and is based on 39 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
91.82%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Face-to-Face | Weight | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jacqui | 10/10 | 20 days | 99.94 | 100% | |
| Jackie Sue | 9/10 | 20 days | 99.94 | 100% | |
| Anwang | 10/10 | 51 days | 99.59 | 100% | |
| Raphaele | 10/10 | 51 days | 99.59 | 100% | |
| Ymke Huisman | 10/10 | 51 days | 99.59 | 100% | |
| Martin | 9/10 | 51 days | 99.59 | 100% | |
| Dan | 9/10 | 51 days | 99.59 | 100% | |
| Matt | 10/10 | 81 days | 98.96 | 99% | |
| Meagan | 10/10 | 81 days | 98.96 | 99% | |
| Thematthew | 8/10 | 81 days | 98.96 | 99% | |
| Philip Page | 10/10 | 112 days | 98.01 | 98% | |
| Tamara & Brittany | 8/10 | 112 days | 98.01 | 98% | |
| Shay Klimo | 10/10 | 112 days | 98.01 | 98% | |
| helen reeve | 10/10 | 112 days | 98.01 | 98% | |
| Mike Fricker | 9/10 | 112 days | 98.01 | 98% | |
| Kimberly | 10/10 | 142 days | 96.8 | 97% | |
| Scooper | 10/10 | 142 days | 96.8 | 97% | |
| Louis | 9/10 | 204 days | 93.41 | 93% | |
| James Richmond | 9/10 | 204 days | 93.41 | 93% | |
| Kiri Edwards | 7/10 | 204 days | 93.41 | 93% | |
| Sue | 10/10 | 204 days | 93.41 | 93% | |
| Artem | 10/10 | 265 days | 88.87 | 89% | |
| Raylene Harvey | 10/10 | 265 days | 88.87 | 89% | |
| WeiQiang Ng | 8/10 | 265 days | 88.87 | 89% | |
| Cefa | 9/10 | 295 days | 86.21 | 86% | |
| Nicolas | 8/10 | 326 days | 83.16 | 83% | |
| David Palmer | 8/10 | 326 days | 83.16 | 83% | |
| The Farrs | 9/10 | 326 days | 83.16 | 83% | |
| Matthew Hall | 10/10 | 380 days | 77.12 | 77% | |
| Tay Dao Han | 8/10 | 401 days | 74.52 | 74% | |
| Geart-Jan Benedictus | 9/10 | 404 days | 74.14 | 74% | |
| Howard Morris | 7/10 | 478 days | 63.79 | 63% | |
| Francesca Gallagher | 10/10 | 484 days | 62.88 | 62% | |
| Gary Wu | 7/10 | 559 days | 50.53 | 49% | |
| Ann Le | 10/10 | 642 days | 37.52 | 36% | |
| Igor | 8/10 | 667 days | 34.03 | 32% | |
| Cathy Mead | 7/10 | 683 days | 31.9 | 30% | |
| Victoria Strong | 10/10 | 748 days | 24.08 | 22% | |
| Jair | 7/10 | 760 days |  |
27.34 | 26% |
| Verena Fendt | 9/10 | 764 days | 22.36 | 20% | |
| Leonie Westerhot | 10/10 | 767 days | |
26.46 | 25% |
| Madi | 9/10 | 775 days | |
25.47 | 24% |
| Frederick Yott | 9/10 | 775 days | |
25.47 | 24% |
| Greg MacFire | 10/10 | 787 days | 20.03 | 18% | |
| Pedro Cordeiru | 10/10 | 808 days | |
21.66 | 20% |
| Jude Ong | 10/10 | 811 days | 17.78 | 16% | |
| Julia Hamblyn | 10/10 | 831 days | 16.04 | 14% | |
| Puneet Mishra | 10/10 | 836 days | 15.63 | 14% | |
| Victoria Wells | 10/10 | 840 days | 15.3 | 13% | |
| Romano Turco | 10/10 | 846 days | 14.82 | 13% | |
| Shaylene Noble | 10/10 | 846 days | 14.82 | 13% | |
| Josie Gray | 10/10 | 853 days | 14.28 | 12% | |
| Tones D | 9/10 | 934 days | 9.11 | 7% | |
| Michael Menrath | 10/10 | 1053 days | 5.28 | 3% | |
| Estelle Daniel | 9/10 | 1058 days | 5.22 | 3% | |
| Volker Stroenisch | 9/10 | 1070 days | 5.1 | 3% | |
| Jakob Gerber | 9/10 | 1084 days | 5.02 | 3% | |
| Mark Sercombe | 6/10 | 1101 days | 4.99 | 3% | |
| Sam Brydon | 10/10 | 1116 days | 4.97 | 3% | |
| Suzanne Vermeulen | 8/10 | 1177 days | 4.89 | 2% | |
| Jennifer Brown | 10/10 | 1177 days | 4.89 | 2% | |
| Shanae Andrews | 10/10 | 1242 days | 4.8 | 2% | |
| Yann Le Gac | 8/10 | 1361 days | 4.64 | 2% | |
| Allyson Taylor | 9/10 | 1415 days | 4.56 | 2% | |
| Julia | 10/10 | 1422 days | 4.55 | 2% | |
| Sarah Good | 10/10 | 1465 days | 4.49 | 2% | |
| Manolis Pavlakis | 9/10 | 1481 days | 4.47 | 2% | |
| Sina Leidig | 9/10 | 1542 days | 4.39 | 2% | |
| Daniel Jarrett | 10/10 | 1573 days | 4.35 | 2% | |
| kim | 10/10 | 1603 days | 4.3 | 2% | |
| Moley | 10/10 | 1634 days | 4.26 | 2% | |
| Lindsay Berquist | 8/10 | 1726 days | 4.14 | 2% | |
| Shona MacDonald | 9/10 | 1753 days | |
4.92 | 3% |
| Ane Didriksen | 9/10 | 1753 days | |
4.92 | 3% |
| Iris Anette Berger | 10/10 | 1753 days | |
4.92 | 3% |
| Caroline Hennache | 9/10 | 1755 days | |
4.92 | 3% |
| isabel Zander | 9/10 | 1755 days | |
4.92 | 3% |
| Calvin Becker | 10/10 | 1755 days | |
4.92 | 3% |
| Claudia | 10/10 | 1756 days | 4.09 | 2% | |
| Jeroen Suijlang | 10/10 | 1760 days | |
4.91 | 3% |
| Helen Olsson | 7/10 | 1763 days | |
4.9 | 3% |
| Hanna Liebe | 8/10 | 1770 days | |
4.89 | 2% |
| Niamh Duane | 10/10 | 1770 days | |
4.89 | 2% |
| Andreas Liebe | 8/10 | 1770 days | |
4.89 | 2% |
| Svenja Trubenbach | 10/10 | 1771 days | |
4.89 | 2% |
| Florent Bouillon | 8/10 | 1784 days | |
4.87 | 2% |
| Linda Wainman | 9/10 | 1784 days | |
4.87 | 2% |
| Chris Wainman | 8/10 | 1784 days | |
4.87 | 2% |
| Simon Galpin | 9/10 | 1785 days | |
4.87 | 2% |
| Benoit Irissou | 8/10 | 1787 days | |
4.86 | 2% |
| Igor | 7/10 | 1787 days | |
4.86 | 2% |
| Hadar | 9/10 | 1791 days | |
4.86 | 2% |
| Bill | 10/10 | 1813 days | |
4.82 | 2% |
| Trish Saunders | 10/10 | 1839 days | |
4.78 | 2% |
| Kath Tonkin | 8/10 | 1839 days | |
4.78 | 2% |
| celie Mcquair | 10/10 | 1852 days | |
4.76 | 2% |
| Bjorn Van Mulders | 10/10 | 1856 days | |
4.75 | 2% |
| Simon Wagner | 10/10 | 1877 days | 3.93 | 2% | |
| Tim J | 9/10 | 1877 days | 3.93 | 2% | |
| Helene & Peter | 8/10 | 1907 days | 3.89 | 1% | |
| Kiwix3 | 10/10 | 1938 days | 3.85 | 1% | |
| Pokari | 10/10 | 1938 days | 3.85 | 1% | |
| Robin Hales | 10/10 | 1938 days | 3.85 | 1% | |
| Nigel & Annie Dale | 10/10 | 1938 days | 3.85 | 1% | |
| Steve Warren | 10/10 | 1968 days | 3.8 | 1% | |
| Jay Sorrell | 10/10 | 1968 days | 3.8 | 1% | |
| Team Kim&James | 9/10 | 1999 days | 3.76 | 1% | |
| Mette, Bo, Viktor & Olivia Seligmann | 10/10 | 2121 days | 3.59 | 1% | |
| ramy | 10/10 | 2121 days | 3.59 | 1% | |
| Michael Heuer | 8/10 | 2129 days | |
4.3 | 2% |
| Marco Schmidt | 10/10 | 2131 days | |
4.3 | 2% |
| Christian Schumacher | 10/10 | 2131 days | |
4.3 | 2% |
| Arno Leleu | 9/10 | 2161 days | |
4.25 | 2% |
| Loesje | 10/10 | 2211 days | 3.47 | 1% | |
| rich kiimmii | 7/10 | 2211 days | 3.47 | 1% | |
| C'est_Tina | 10/10 | 2211 days | 3.47 | 1% | |
| mirimirik | 10/10 | 2242 days | 3.43 | 1% | |
| phudgb | 10/10 | 2303 days | 3.35 | 1% | |
| Rob Gill | 8/10 | 2530 days | |
3.64 | 1% |
| Graeme | 8/10 | 2577 days | 2.97 | 1% | |
| Jesper Hassel | 8/10 | 2888 days | |
3.05 | 1% |
| Victoria Slater | 10/10 | 3222 days | |
2.5 | 0% |
| Marg | 8/10 | 3223 days | |
2.5 | 0% |
| Ina | 10/10 | 3235 days | |
2.48 | 0% |
| Nicky and Andy Prescott | 10/10 | 3250 days | |
2.46 | 0% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Lake Pukaki Overnight Campervan Parking does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Final Ranking Score
92%
The final ranking score once rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.