Ranking Score Explained
Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Lake Pukaki Overnight Campervan Parking.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Lake Pukaki Overnight Campervan Parking
Valid Reviews
156 Valid Reviews
The Lake Pukaki Overnight Campervan Parking experience has a total of 160 reviews. There are 156 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 4 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 156 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 72 |
|
46% |
| 9/10 | 45 |
|
29% |
| 8/10 | 27 |
|
17% |
| 7/10 | 8 |
|
5% |
| 6/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
90.90% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Lake Pukaki Overnight Campervan Parking valid reviews is 90.90% and is based on 156 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
39 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 156 valid reviews, the experience has 39 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 39 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 16 |
|
41% |
| 9/10 | 10 |
|
26% |
| 8/10 | 10 |
|
26% |
| 7/10 | 3 |
|
8% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
90.00% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Lake Pukaki Overnight Campervan Parking face-to-face reviews is 90.00% and is based on 39 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
89.92%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Face-to-Face | Weight | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lisa | 9/10 | 40 days | 99.75 | 100% | |
| Katherine Ong | 9/10 | 71 days | 99.2 | 99% | |
| Ambs | 9/10 | 71 days | 99.2 | 99% | |
| kay | 8/10 | 71 days | 94.24 | 94% | |
| Kate | 10/10 | 132 days | 97.24 | 97% | |
| Kieron | 8/10 | 193 days | 89.39 | 90% | |
| El and Josh | 9/10 | 193 days | 94.1 | 94% | |
| Kristyl | 8/10 | 193 days | 89.39 | 90% | |
| Kristyl | 8/10 | 193 days | 89.39 | 90% | |
| Ah Beng | 9/10 | 193 days | 94.1 | 94% | |
| Kristal | 9/10 | 224 days | 92.05 | 92% | |
| Rick’d | 9/10 | 254 days | 89.78 | 90% | |
| Rebecca | 9/10 | 254 days | 89.78 | 90% | |
| Apichaya Srimaneemongkon | 10/10 | 254 days | 89.78 | 90% | |
| Taylor | 9/10 | 254 days | 89.78 | 90% | |
| Kipnkeri | 5/10 | 254 days | 72.72 | 73% | |
| Vicki Hoskinson | 10/10 | 284 days | 87.22 | 87% | |
| Aisling | 9/10 | 285 days | 87.13 | 87% | |
| Sunseeker | 4/10 | 285 days | 68.83 | 69% | |
| kim thomas | 10/10 | 285 days | 87.13 | 87% | |
| Stefan Miedzinski | 9/10 | 285 days | 87.13 | 87% | |
| Love Papamoa. | 9/10 | 285 days | 87.13 | 87% | |
| Mads Mossin | 10/10 | 285 days | 87.13 | 87% | |
| Tim | 9/10 | 313 days | 84.48 | 85% | |
| Marinette Kegels | 6/10 | 313 days | 70.11 | 70% | |
| Sophie | 10/10 | 313 days | 84.48 | 85% | |
| Kosala Perera | 8/10 | 313 days | 80.25 | 80% | |
| Iggy | 9/10 | 313 days | 84.48 | 85% | |
| Pedro | 9/10 | 313 days | 84.48 | 85% | |
| Jacqui | 10/10 | 344 days | 81.25 | 81% | |
| Jackie Sue | 9/10 | 344 days | 81.25 | 81% | |
| Elian Lefebvre | 9/10 | 344 days | 81.25 | 81% | |
| Anwang | 10/10 | 375 days | 77.72 | 78% | |
| Raphaele | 10/10 | 375 days | 77.72 | 78% | |
| Ymke Huisman | 10/10 | 375 days | 77.72 | 78% | |
| Martin | 9/10 | 375 days | 77.72 | 78% | |
| Dan | 9/10 | 375 days | 77.72 | 78% | |
| Cris | 10/10 | 375 days | 77.72 | 78% | |
| Matt | 10/10 | 405 days | 74.01 | 74% | |
| Meagan | 10/10 | 405 days | 74.01 | 74% | |
| Thematthew | 8/10 | 405 days | 70.31 | 70% | |
| Philip Page | 10/10 | 436 days | 69.88 | 70% | |
| Tamara & Brittany | 8/10 | 436 days | 66.38 | 67% | |
| Shay Klimo | 10/10 | 436 days | 69.88 | 70% | |
| helen reeve | 10/10 | 436 days | 69.88 | 70% | |
| Mike Fricker | 9/10 | 436 days | 69.88 | 70% | |
| Kimberly | 10/10 | 466 days | 65.59 | 66% | |
| Scooper | 10/10 | 466 days | 65.59 | 66% | |
| Louis | 9/10 | 528 days | 55.82 | 56% | |
| James Richmond | 9/10 | 528 days | 55.82 | 56% | |
| Kiri Edwards | 7/10 | 528 days | 50.8 | 51% | |
| Sue | 10/10 | 528 days | 55.82 | 56% | |
| Artem | 10/10 | 589 days | 45.57 | 46% | |
| Raylene Harvey | 10/10 | 589 days | 45.57 | 46% | |
| WeiQiang Ng | 8/10 | 589 days | 43.29 | 43% | |
| Cefa | 9/10 | 619 days | 40.9 | 41% | |
| Nicolas | 8/10 | 650 days | 34.56 | 35% | |
| David Palmer | 8/10 | 650 days | 34.56 | 35% | |
| The Farrs | 9/10 | 650 days | 36.38 | 36% | |
| Matthew Hall | 10/10 | 704 days | 29.23 | 29% | |
| Tay Dao Han | 8/10 | 725 days | 25.36 | 25% | |
| Geart-Jan Benedictus | 9/10 | 728 days | 26.34 | 26% | |
| Howard Morris | 7/10 | 802 days | 16.93 | 17% | |
| Francesca Gallagher | 10/10 | 808 days | 18.05 | 18% | |
| Gary Wu | 7/10 | 883 days | 11.03 | 11% | |
| Ann Le | 10/10 | 966 days | 7.64 | 8% | |
| Igor | 8/10 | 991 days | 6.38 | 6% | |
| Cathy Mead | 7/10 | 1007 days | 5.67 | 6% | |
| Victoria Strong | 10/10 | 1072 days | 5.08 | 5% | |
| Jair | 7/10 | 1084 days |  |
4.57 | 4% |
| Verena Fendt | 9/10 | 1088 days | 5.01 | 5% | |
| Leonie Westerhot | 10/10 | 1091 days | |
5.0 | 5% |
| Madi | 9/10 | 1099 days | |
4.99 | 5% |
| Frederick Yott | 9/10 | 1099 days | |
4.99 | 5% |
| Greg MacFire | 10/10 | 1111 days | 4.97 | 5% | |
| Pedro Cordeiru | 10/10 | 1132 days | |
4.93 | 5% |
| Jude Ong | 10/10 | 1134 days | 4.92 | 5% | |
| Julia Hamblyn | 10/10 | 1155 days | 4.88 | 5% | |
| Puneet Mishra | 10/10 | 1160 days | 4.87 | 5% | |
| Victoria Wells | 10/10 | 1164 days | 4.86 | 5% | |
| Romano Turco | 10/10 | 1170 days | 4.85 | 5% | |
| Shaylene Noble | 10/10 | 1170 days | 4.85 | 5% | |
| Josie Gray | 10/10 | 1177 days | 4.84 | 5% | |
| Tones D | 9/10 | 1257 days | 4.68 | 5% | |
| Michael Menrath | 10/10 | 1377 days | 4.45 | 4% | |
| Estelle Daniel | 9/10 | 1382 days | 4.44 | 4% | |
| Volker Stroenisch | 9/10 | 1394 days | 4.41 | 4% | |
| Jakob Gerber | 9/10 | 1408 days | 4.39 | 4% | |
| Mark Sercombe | 6/10 | 1425 days | 3.61 | 3% | |
| Sam Brydon | 10/10 | 1439 days | 4.33 | 4% | |
| Suzanne Vermeulen | 8/10 | 1500 days | 4.0 | 4% | |
| Jennifer Brown | 10/10 | 1500 days | 4.21 | 4% | |
| Shanae Andrews | 10/10 | 1566 days | 4.08 | 4% | |
| Yann Le Gac | 8/10 | 1684 days | 3.65 | 4% | |
| Allyson Taylor | 9/10 | 1739 days | 3.74 | 4% | |
| Julia | 10/10 | 1745 days | 3.73 | 4% | |
| Sarah Good | 10/10 | 1789 days | 3.64 | 4% | |
| Manolis Pavlakis | 9/10 | 1804 days | 3.61 | 3% | |
| Sina Leidig | 9/10 | 1865 days | 3.49 | 3% | |
| Daniel Jarrett | 10/10 | 1896 days | 3.43 | 3% | |
| kim | 10/10 | 1926 days | 3.37 | 3% | |
| Moley | 10/10 | 1958 days | 3.31 | 3% | |
| Lindsay Berquist | 8/10 | 2050 days | 2.97 | 3% | |
| Shona MacDonald | 9/10 | 2077 days | |
3.08 | 3% |
| Ane Didriksen | 9/10 | 2077 days | |
3.08 | 3% |
| Iris Anette Berger | 10/10 | 2077 days | |
3.08 | 3% |
| Caroline Hennache | 9/10 | 2079 days | |
3.07 | 3% |
| isabel Zander | 9/10 | 2079 days | |
3.07 | 3% |
| Calvin Becker | 10/10 | 2079 days | |
3.07 | 3% |
| Claudia | 10/10 | 2079 days | 3.07 | 3% | |
| Jeroen Suijlang | 10/10 | 2084 days | |
3.06 | 3% |
| Helen Olsson | 7/10 | 2087 days | |
2.78 | 3% |
| Hanna Liebe | 8/10 | 2094 days | |
2.89 | 3% |
| Niamh Duane | 10/10 | 2094 days | |
3.05 | 3% |
| Andreas Liebe | 8/10 | 2094 days | |
2.89 | 3% |
| Svenja Trubenbach | 10/10 | 2095 days | |
3.04 | 3% |
| Florent Bouillon | 8/10 | 2108 days | |
2.87 | 3% |
| Linda Wainman | 9/10 | 2108 days | |
3.02 | 3% |
| Chris Wainman | 8/10 | 2108 days | |
2.87 | 3% |
| Simon Galpin | 9/10 | 2109 days | |
3.02 | 3% |
| Benoit Irissou | 8/10 | 2111 days | |
2.86 | 3% |
| Igor | 7/10 | 2111 days | |
2.74 | 3% |
| Hadar | 9/10 | 2115 days | |
3.0 | 3% |
| Bill | 10/10 | 2137 days | |
2.96 | 3% |
| Trish Saunders | 10/10 | 2163 days | |
2.91 | 3% |
| Kath Tonkin | 8/10 | 2163 days | |
2.76 | 3% |
| celie Mcquair | 10/10 | 2176 days | |
2.88 | 3% |
| Bjorn Van Mulders | 10/10 | 2180 days | |
2.88 | 3% |
| Simon Wagner | 10/10 | 2201 days | 2.84 | 3% | |
| Tim J | 9/10 | 2201 days | 2.84 | 3% | |
| Helene & Peter | 8/10 | 2231 days | 2.64 | 2% | |
| Kiwix3 | 10/10 | 2262 days | 2.72 | 3% | |
| Pokari | 10/10 | 2262 days | 2.72 | 3% | |
| Robin Hales | 10/10 | 2262 days | 2.72 | 3% | |
| Nigel & Annie Dale | 10/10 | 2262 days | 2.72 | 3% | |
| Steve Warren | 10/10 | 2292 days | 2.66 | 3% | |
| Jay Sorrell | 10/10 | 2292 days | 2.66 | 3% | |
| Team Kim&James | 9/10 | 2323 days | 2.6 | 2% | |
| Mette, Bo, Viktor & Olivia Seligmann | 10/10 | 2445 days | 2.36 | 2% | |
| ramy | 10/10 | 2445 days | 2.36 | 2% | |
| Michael Heuer | 8/10 | 2453 days | |
2.23 | 2% |
| Marco Schmidt | 10/10 | 2455 days | |
2.34 | 2% |
| Christian Schumacher | 10/10 | 2455 days | |
2.34 | 2% |
| Arno Leleu | 9/10 | 2485 days | |
2.28 | 2% |
| Loesje | 10/10 | 2535 days | 2.18 | 2% | |
| rich kiimmii | 7/10 | 2535 days | 1.99 | 2% | |
| C'est_Tina | 10/10 | 2535 days | 2.18 | 2% | |
| mirimirik | 10/10 | 2566 days | 2.12 | 2% | |
| phudgb | 10/10 | 2627 days | 2.0 | 2% | |
| Rob Gill | 8/10 | 2854 days | |
1.48 | 1% |
| Graeme | 8/10 | 2901 days | 1.39 | 1% | |
| Jesper Hassel | 8/10 | 3212 days | |
0.81 | 1% |
| Victoria Slater | 10/10 | 3546 days | |
0.2 | 0% |
| Marg | 8/10 | 3547 days | |
0.19 | 0% |
| Ina | 10/10 | 3559 days | |
0.18 | 0% |
| Nicky and Andy Prescott | 10/10 | 3574 days | |
0.15 | 0% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Lake Pukaki Overnight Campervan Parking does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Final Ranking Score
90%
The final ranking score once rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.