Ranking Score Explained
Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Lake Pukaki Overnight Campervan Parking.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Nick Morrison
Rankers owner
Lake Pukaki Overnight Campervan Parking
Valid Reviews
134 Valid Reviews
The Lake Pukaki Overnight Campervan Parking experience has a total of 137 reviews. There are 134 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 3 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 134 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 66 |
|
49% |
| 9/10 | 34 |
|
25% |
| 8/10 | 23 |
|
17% |
| 7/10 | 8 |
|
6% |
| 6/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
91.19% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Lake Pukaki Overnight Campervan Parking valid reviews is 91.19% and is based on 134 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
39 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 134 valid reviews, the experience has 39 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 39 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 16 |
|
41% |
| 9/10 | 10 |
|
26% |
| 8/10 | 10 |
|
26% |
| 7/10 | 3 |
|
8% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
90.00% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Lake Pukaki Overnight Campervan Parking face-to-face reviews is 90.00% and is based on 39 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
89.82%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Face-to-Face | Weight | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aisling | 9/10 | 22 days | 99.92 | 100% | |
| Sunseeker | 4/10 | 22 days | 92.93 | 93% | |
| Tim | 9/10 | 50 days | 99.6 | 100% | |
| Marinette Kegels | 6/10 | 50 days | 99.6 | 100% | |
| Sophie | 10/10 | 50 days | 99.6 | 100% | |
| Kosala Perera | 8/10 | 50 days | 99.6 | 100% | |
| Iggy | 9/10 | 50 days | 99.6 | 100% | |
| Pedro | 9/10 | 50 days | 99.6 | 100% | |
| Jacqui | 10/10 | 81 days | 98.96 | 99% | |
| Jackie Sue | 9/10 | 81 days | 98.96 | 99% | |
| Elian Lefebvre | 9/10 | 81 days | 98.96 | 99% | |
| Anwang | 10/10 | 112 days | 98.01 | 98% | |
| Raphaele | 10/10 | 112 days | 98.01 | 98% | |
| Ymke Huisman | 10/10 | 112 days | 98.01 | 98% | |
| Martin | 9/10 | 112 days | 98.01 | 98% | |
| Dan | 9/10 | 112 days | 98.01 | 98% | |
| Matt | 10/10 | 142 days | 96.8 | 97% | |
| Meagan | 10/10 | 142 days | 96.8 | 97% | |
| Thematthew | 8/10 | 142 days | 96.8 | 97% | |
| Philip Page | 10/10 | 173 days | 95.26 | 95% | |
| Tamara & Brittany | 8/10 | 173 days | 95.26 | 95% | |
| Shay Klimo | 10/10 | 173 days | 95.26 | 95% | |
| helen reeve | 10/10 | 173 days | 95.26 | 95% | |
| Mike Fricker | 9/10 | 173 days | 95.26 | 95% | |
| Kimberly | 10/10 | 203 days | 93.47 | 93% | |
| Scooper | 10/10 | 203 days | 93.47 | 93% | |
| Louis | 9/10 | 265 days | 88.87 | 89% | |
| James Richmond | 9/10 | 265 days | 88.87 | 89% | |
| Kiri Edwards | 7/10 | 265 days | 88.87 | 89% | |
| Sue | 10/10 | 265 days | 88.87 | 89% | |
| Artem | 10/10 | 326 days | 83.16 | 83% | |
| Raylene Harvey | 10/10 | 326 days | 83.16 | 83% | |
| WeiQiang Ng | 8/10 | 326 days | 83.16 | 83% | |
| Cefa | 9/10 | 356 days | 79.92 | 79% | |
| Nicolas | 8/10 | 387 days | 76.27 | 76% | |
| David Palmer | 8/10 | 387 days | 76.27 | 76% | |
| The Farrs | 9/10 | 387 days | 76.27 | 76% | |
| Matthew Hall | 10/10 | 441 days | 69.18 | 68% | |
| Tay Dao Han | 8/10 | 462 days | 66.18 | 65% | |
| Geart-Jan Benedictus | 9/10 | 465 days | 65.74 | 65% | |
| Howard Morris | 7/10 | 539 days | 53.96 | 53% | |
| Francesca Gallagher | 10/10 | 545 days | 52.93 | 52% | |
| Gary Wu | 7/10 | 620 days | 40.75 | 39% | |
| Ann Le | 10/10 | 703 days | 29.35 | 28% | |
| Igor | 8/10 | 728 days | 26.34 | 25% | |
| Cathy Mead | 7/10 | 744 days | 24.52 | 23% | |
| Victoria Strong | 10/10 | 809 days | 17.96 | 16% | |
| Jair | 7/10 | 821 days |  |
20.28 | 18% |
| Verena Fendt | 9/10 | 825 days | 16.55 | 15% | |
| Leonie Westerhot | 10/10 | 828 days | |
19.56 | 18% |
| Madi | 9/10 | 836 days | |
18.76 | 17% |
| Frederick Yott | 9/10 | 836 days | |
18.76 | 17% |
| Greg MacFire | 10/10 | 848 days | 14.67 | 13% | |
| Pedro Cordeiru | 10/10 | 869 days | |
15.71 | 14% |
| Jude Ong | 10/10 | 872 days | 12.88 | 11% | |
| Julia Hamblyn | 10/10 | 892 days | 11.53 | 9% | |
| Puneet Mishra | 10/10 | 897 days | 11.21 | 9% | |
| Victoria Wells | 10/10 | 901 days | 10.96 | 9% | |
| Romano Turco | 10/10 | 907 days | 10.6 | 8% | |
| Shaylene Noble | 10/10 | 907 days | 10.6 | 8% | |
| Josie Gray | 10/10 | 914 days | 10.19 | 8% | |
| Tones D | 9/10 | 995 days | 6.58 | 4% | |
| Michael Menrath | 10/10 | 1114 days | 4.97 | 3% | |
| Estelle Daniel | 9/10 | 1119 days | 4.97 | 3% | |
| Volker Stroenisch | 9/10 | 1131 days | 4.95 | 3% | |
| Jakob Gerber | 9/10 | 1145 days | 4.93 | 3% | |
| Mark Sercombe | 6/10 | 1162 days | 4.91 | 3% | |
| Sam Brydon | 10/10 | 1177 days | 4.89 | 3% | |
| Suzanne Vermeulen | 8/10 | 1238 days | 4.8 | 3% | |
| Jennifer Brown | 10/10 | 1238 days | 4.8 | 3% | |
| Shanae Andrews | 10/10 | 1303 days | 4.72 | 2% | |
| Yann Le Gac | 8/10 | 1422 days | 4.55 | 2% | |
| Allyson Taylor | 9/10 | 1476 days | 4.48 | 2% | |
| Julia | 10/10 | 1483 days | 4.47 | 2% | |
| Sarah Good | 10/10 | 1526 days | 4.41 | 2% | |
| Manolis Pavlakis | 9/10 | 1542 days | 4.39 | 2% | |
| Sina Leidig | 9/10 | 1603 days | 4.3 | 2% | |
| Daniel Jarrett | 10/10 | 1634 days | 4.26 | 2% | |
| kim | 10/10 | 1664 days | 4.22 | 2% | |
| Moley | 10/10 | 1695 days | 4.18 | 2% | |
| Lindsay Berquist | 8/10 | 1787 days | 4.05 | 2% | |
| Shona MacDonald | 9/10 | 1814 days | |
4.82 | 3% |
| Ane Didriksen | 9/10 | 1814 days | |
4.82 | 3% |
| Iris Anette Berger | 10/10 | 1814 days | |
4.82 | 3% |
| Caroline Hennache | 9/10 | 1816 days | |
4.81 | 3% |
| isabel Zander | 9/10 | 1816 days | |
4.81 | 3% |
| Calvin Becker | 10/10 | 1816 days | |
4.81 | 3% |
| Claudia | 10/10 | 1817 days | 4.01 | 2% | |
| Jeroen Suijlang | 10/10 | 1821 days | |
4.81 | 3% |
| Helen Olsson | 7/10 | 1824 days | |
4.8 | 3% |
| Hanna Liebe | 8/10 | 1831 days | |
4.79 | 2% |
| Niamh Duane | 10/10 | 1831 days | |
4.79 | 2% |
| Andreas Liebe | 8/10 | 1831 days | |
4.79 | 2% |
| Svenja Trubenbach | 10/10 | 1832 days | |
4.79 | 2% |
| Florent Bouillon | 8/10 | 1845 days | |
4.77 | 2% |
| Linda Wainman | 9/10 | 1845 days | |
4.77 | 2% |
| Chris Wainman | 8/10 | 1845 days | |
4.77 | 2% |
| Simon Galpin | 9/10 | 1846 days | |
4.77 | 2% |
| Benoit Irissou | 8/10 | 1848 days | |
4.76 | 2% |
| Igor | 7/10 | 1848 days | |
4.76 | 2% |
| Hadar | 9/10 | 1852 days | |
4.76 | 2% |
| Bill | 10/10 | 1874 days | |
4.72 | 2% |
| Trish Saunders | 10/10 | 1900 days | |
4.68 | 2% |
| Kath Tonkin | 8/10 | 1900 days | |
4.68 | 2% |
| celie Mcquair | 10/10 | 1913 days | |
4.66 | 2% |
| Bjorn Van Mulders | 10/10 | 1917 days | |
4.65 | 2% |
| Simon Wagner | 10/10 | 1938 days | 3.85 | 2% | |
| Tim J | 9/10 | 1938 days | 3.85 | 2% | |
| Helene & Peter | 8/10 | 1968 days | 3.8 | 1% | |
| Kiwix3 | 10/10 | 1999 days | 3.76 | 1% | |
| Pokari | 10/10 | 1999 days | 3.76 | 1% | |
| Robin Hales | 10/10 | 1999 days | 3.76 | 1% | |
| Nigel & Annie Dale | 10/10 | 1999 days | 3.76 | 1% | |
| Steve Warren | 10/10 | 2029 days | 3.72 | 1% | |
| Jay Sorrell | 10/10 | 2029 days | 3.72 | 1% | |
| Team Kim&James | 9/10 | 2060 days | 3.68 | 1% | |
| Mette, Bo, Viktor & Olivia Seligmann | 10/10 | 2182 days | 3.51 | 1% | |
| ramy | 10/10 | 2182 days | 3.51 | 1% | |
| Michael Heuer | 8/10 | 2190 days | |
4.2 | 2% |
| Marco Schmidt | 10/10 | 2192 days | |
4.2 | 2% |
| Christian Schumacher | 10/10 | 2192 days | |
4.2 | 2% |
| Arno Leleu | 9/10 | 2222 days | |
4.15 | 2% |
| Loesje | 10/10 | 2272 days | 3.39 | 1% | |
| rich kiimmii | 7/10 | 2272 days | 3.39 | 1% | |
| C'est_Tina | 10/10 | 2272 days | 3.39 | 1% | |
| mirimirik | 10/10 | 2303 days | 3.35 | 1% | |
| phudgb | 10/10 | 2364 days | 3.26 | 1% | |
| Rob Gill | 8/10 | 2591 days | |
3.54 | 1% |
| Graeme | 8/10 | 2638 days | 2.89 | 1% | |
| Jesper Hassel | 8/10 | 2949 days | |
2.95 | 1% |
| Victoria Slater | 10/10 | 3283 days | |
2.4 | 0% |
| Marg | 8/10 | 3284 days | |
2.4 | 0% |
| Ina | 10/10 | 3296 days | |
2.38 | 0% |
| Nicky and Andy Prescott | 10/10 | 3311 days | |
2.36 | 0% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Lake Pukaki Overnight Campervan Parking does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Final Ranking Score
90%
The final ranking score once rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.