Ranking Score Explained
Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Lake Pukaki Overnight Campervan Parking.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Lake Pukaki Overnight Campervan Parking
Valid Reviews
151 Valid Reviews
The Lake Pukaki Overnight Campervan Parking experience has a total of 155 reviews. There are 151 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 4 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 151 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 71 |
|
47% |
| 9/10 | 42 |
|
28% |
| 8/10 | 26 |
|
17% |
| 7/10 | 8 |
|
5% |
| 6/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
90.93% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Lake Pukaki Overnight Campervan Parking valid reviews is 90.93% and is based on 151 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
39 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 151 valid reviews, the experience has 39 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 39 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 16 |
|
41% |
| 9/10 | 10 |
|
26% |
| 8/10 | 10 |
|
26% |
| 7/10 | 3 |
|
8% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
90.00% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Lake Pukaki Overnight Campervan Parking face-to-face reviews is 90.00% and is based on 39 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
89.96%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Face-to-Face | Weight | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kieron | 8/10 | 78 days | 94.08 | 95% | |
| El and Josh | 9/10 | 78 days | 99.04 | 100% | |
| Kristyl | 8/10 | 78 days | 94.08 | 95% | |
| Kristyl | 8/10 | 78 days | 94.08 | 95% | |
| Ah Beng | 9/10 | 78 days | 99.04 | 100% | |
| Kristal | 9/10 | 109 days | 98.12 | 99% | |
| Rick’d | 9/10 | 139 days | 96.94 | 98% | |
| Rebecca | 9/10 | 139 days | 96.94 | 98% | |
| Apichaya Srimaneemongkon | 10/10 | 139 days | 96.94 | 98% | |
| Taylor | 9/10 | 139 days | 96.94 | 98% | |
| Kipnkeri | 5/10 | 139 days | 78.52 | 79% | |
| Vicki Hoskinson | 10/10 | 170 days | 95.42 | 96% | |
| Aisling | 9/10 | 170 days | 95.42 | 96% | |
| Sunseeker | 4/10 | 170 days | 75.38 | 76% | |
| kim thomas | 10/10 | 170 days | 95.42 | 96% | |
| Stefan Miedzinski | 9/10 | 170 days | 95.42 | 96% | |
| Love Papamoa. | 9/10 | 170 days | 95.42 | 96% | |
| Mads Mossin | 10/10 | 170 days | 95.42 | 96% | |
| Tim | 9/10 | 198 days | 93.79 | 95% | |
| Marinette Kegels | 6/10 | 198 days | 77.84 | 78% | |
| Sophie | 10/10 | 198 days | 93.79 | 95% | |
| Kosala Perera | 8/10 | 198 days | 89.1 | 90% | |
| Iggy | 9/10 | 198 days | 93.79 | 95% | |
| Pedro | 9/10 | 198 days | 93.79 | 95% | |
| Jacqui | 10/10 | 229 days | 91.69 | 92% | |
| Jackie Sue | 9/10 | 229 days | 91.69 | 92% | |
| Elian Lefebvre | 9/10 | 229 days | 91.69 | 92% | |
| Anwang | 10/10 | 260 days | 89.29 | 90% | |
| Raphaele | 10/10 | 260 days | 89.29 | 90% | |
| Ymke Huisman | 10/10 | 260 days | 89.29 | 90% | |
| Martin | 9/10 | 260 days | 89.29 | 90% | |
| Dan | 9/10 | 260 days | 89.29 | 90% | |
| Cris | 10/10 | 260 days | 89.29 | 90% | |
| Matt | 10/10 | 290 days | 86.67 | 87% | |
| Meagan | 10/10 | 290 days | 86.67 | 87% | |
| Thematthew | 8/10 | 290 days | 82.34 | 83% | |
| Philip Page | 10/10 | 321 days | 83.67 | 84% | |
| Tamara & Brittany | 8/10 | 321 days | 79.49 | 80% | |
| Shay Klimo | 10/10 | 321 days | 83.67 | 84% | |
| helen reeve | 10/10 | 321 days | 83.67 | 84% | |
| Mike Fricker | 9/10 | 321 days | 83.67 | 84% | |
| Kimberly | 10/10 | 351 days | 80.48 | 81% | |
| Scooper | 10/10 | 351 days | 80.48 | 81% | |
| Louis | 9/10 | 413 days | 72.97 | 73% | |
| James Richmond | 9/10 | 413 days | 72.97 | 73% | |
| Kiri Edwards | 7/10 | 413 days | 66.4 | 67% | |
| Sue | 10/10 | 413 days | 72.97 | 73% | |
| Artem | 10/10 | 474 days | 64.4 | 65% | |
| Raylene Harvey | 10/10 | 474 days | 64.4 | 65% | |
| WeiQiang Ng | 8/10 | 474 days | 61.18 | 61% | |
| Cefa | 9/10 | 504 days | 59.75 | 60% | |
| Nicolas | 8/10 | 535 days | 51.91 | 52% | |
| David Palmer | 8/10 | 535 days | 51.91 | 52% | |
| The Farrs | 9/10 | 535 days | 54.64 | 55% | |
| Matthew Hall | 10/10 | 589 days | 45.57 | 45% | |
| Tay Dao Han | 8/10 | 610 days | 40.16 | 40% | |
| Geart-Jan Benedictus | 9/10 | 613 days | 41.81 | 41% | |
| Howard Morris | 7/10 | 687 days | 28.55 | 28% | |
| Francesca Gallagher | 10/10 | 693 days | 30.61 | 30% | |
| Gary Wu | 7/10 | 768 days | 19.97 | 19% | |
| Ann Le | 10/10 | 851 days | 14.43 | 13% | |
| Igor | 8/10 | 876 days | 11.97 | 11% | |
| Cathy Mead | 7/10 | 892 days | 10.49 | 9% | |
| Victoria Strong | 10/10 | 957 days | 8.02 | 7% | |
| Jair | 7/10 | 969 days |  |
6.84 | 6% |
| Verena Fendt | 9/10 | 973 days | 7.36 | 6% | |
| Leonie Westerhot | 10/10 | 976 days | |
7.24 | 6% |
| Madi | 9/10 | 984 days | |
6.95 | 6% |
| Frederick Yott | 9/10 | 984 days | |
6.95 | 6% |
| Greg MacFire | 10/10 | 996 days | 6.55 | 5% | |
| Pedro Cordeiru | 10/10 | 1017 days | |
5.96 | 5% |
| Jude Ong | 10/10 | 1020 days | 5.89 | 5% | |
| Julia Hamblyn | 10/10 | 1040 days | 5.48 | 4% | |
| Puneet Mishra | 10/10 | 1045 days | 5.4 | 4% | |
| Victoria Wells | 10/10 | 1049 days | 5.34 | 4% | |
| Romano Turco | 10/10 | 1055 days | 5.25 | 4% | |
| Shaylene Noble | 10/10 | 1055 days | 5.25 | 4% | |
| Josie Gray | 10/10 | 1062 days | 5.17 | 4% | |
| Tones D | 9/10 | 1143 days | 4.93 | 4% | |
| Michael Menrath | 10/10 | 1262 days | 4.75 | 3% | |
| Estelle Daniel | 9/10 | 1267 days | 4.74 | 3% | |
| Volker Stroenisch | 9/10 | 1279 days | 4.72 | 3% | |
| Jakob Gerber | 9/10 | 1293 days | 4.7 | 3% | |
| Mark Sercombe | 6/10 | 1310 days | 3.88 | 3% | |
| Sam Brydon | 10/10 | 1325 days | 4.65 | 3% | |
| Suzanne Vermeulen | 8/10 | 1386 days | 4.33 | 3% | |
| Jennifer Brown | 10/10 | 1386 days | 4.56 | 3% | |
| Shanae Andrews | 10/10 | 1451 days | 4.46 | 3% | |
| Yann Le Gac | 8/10 | 1570 days | 4.06 | 3% | |
| Allyson Taylor | 9/10 | 1624 days | 4.19 | 3% | |
| Julia | 10/10 | 1631 days | 4.18 | 3% | |
| Sarah Good | 10/10 | 1674 days | 4.12 | 3% | |
| Manolis Pavlakis | 9/10 | 1690 days | 4.09 | 3% | |
| Sina Leidig | 9/10 | 1751 days | 4.0 | 3% | |
| Daniel Jarrett | 10/10 | 1782 days | 3.95 | 3% | |
| kim | 10/10 | 1812 days | 3.91 | 3% | |
| Moley | 10/10 | 1843 days | 3.86 | 3% | |
| Lindsay Berquist | 8/10 | 1935 days | 3.54 | 2% | |
| Shona MacDonald | 9/10 | 1962 days | |
3.68 | 2% |
| Ane Didriksen | 9/10 | 1962 days | |
3.68 | 2% |
| Iris Anette Berger | 10/10 | 1962 days | |
3.68 | 2% |
| Caroline Hennache | 9/10 | 1964 days | |
3.68 | 2% |
| isabel Zander | 9/10 | 1964 days | |
3.68 | 2% |
| Calvin Becker | 10/10 | 1964 days | |
3.68 | 2% |
| Claudia | 10/10 | 1965 days | 3.68 | 2% | |
| Jeroen Suijlang | 10/10 | 1969 days | |
3.67 | 2% |
| Helen Olsson | 7/10 | 1972 days | |
3.34 | 2% |
| Hanna Liebe | 8/10 | 1979 days | |
3.47 | 2% |
| Niamh Duane | 10/10 | 1979 days | |
3.65 | 2% |
| Andreas Liebe | 8/10 | 1979 days | |
3.47 | 2% |
| Svenja Trubenbach | 10/10 | 1980 days | |
3.65 | 2% |
| Florent Bouillon | 8/10 | 1993 days | |
3.45 | 2% |
| Linda Wainman | 9/10 | 1993 days | |
3.63 | 2% |
| Chris Wainman | 8/10 | 1993 days | |
3.45 | 2% |
| Simon Galpin | 9/10 | 1994 days | |
3.63 | 2% |
| Benoit Irissou | 8/10 | 1996 days | |
3.45 | 2% |
| Igor | 7/10 | 1996 days | |
3.3 | 2% |
| Hadar | 9/10 | 2000 days | |
3.62 | 2% |
| Bill | 10/10 | 2022 days | |
3.59 | 2% |
| Trish Saunders | 10/10 | 2048 days | |
3.55 | 2% |
| Kath Tonkin | 8/10 | 2048 days | |
3.37 | 2% |
| celie Mcquair | 10/10 | 2061 days | |
3.53 | 2% |
| Bjorn Van Mulders | 10/10 | 2065 days | |
3.52 | 2% |
| Simon Wagner | 10/10 | 2086 days | 3.49 | 2% | |
| Tim J | 9/10 | 2086 days | 3.49 | 2% | |
| Helene & Peter | 8/10 | 2116 days | 3.27 | 2% | |
| Kiwix3 | 10/10 | 2147 days | 3.4 | 2% | |
| Pokari | 10/10 | 2147 days | 3.4 | 2% | |
| Robin Hales | 10/10 | 2147 days | 3.4 | 2% | |
| Nigel & Annie Dale | 10/10 | 2147 days | 3.4 | 2% | |
| Steve Warren | 10/10 | 2177 days | 3.35 | 2% | |
| Jay Sorrell | 10/10 | 2177 days | 3.35 | 2% | |
| Team Kim&James | 9/10 | 2208 days | 3.31 | 2% | |
| Mette, Bo, Viktor & Olivia Seligmann | 10/10 | 2330 days | 3.12 | 2% | |
| ramy | 10/10 | 2330 days | 3.12 | 2% | |
| Michael Heuer | 8/10 | 2338 days | |
2.95 | 2% |
| Marco Schmidt | 10/10 | 2340 days | |
3.11 | 2% |
| Christian Schumacher | 10/10 | 2340 days | |
3.11 | 2% |
| Arno Leleu | 9/10 | 2370 days | |
3.06 | 2% |
| Loesje | 10/10 | 2420 days | 2.98 | 2% | |
| rich kiimmii | 7/10 | 2420 days | 2.71 | 1% | |
| C'est_Tina | 10/10 | 2420 days | 2.98 | 2% | |
| mirimirik | 10/10 | 2451 days | 2.94 | 2% | |
| phudgb | 10/10 | 2512 days | 2.84 | 2% | |
| Rob Gill | 8/10 | 2739 days | |
2.37 | 1% |
| Graeme | 8/10 | 2786 days | 2.3 | 1% | |
| Jesper Hassel | 8/10 | 3097 days | |
1.86 | 0% |
| Victoria Slater | 10/10 | 3431 days | |
1.44 | 0% |
| Marg | 8/10 | 3432 days | |
1.37 | 0% |
| Ina | 10/10 | 3444 days | |
1.42 | 0% |
| Nicky and Andy Prescott | 10/10 | 3459 days | |
1.4 | 0% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Lake Pukaki Overnight Campervan Parking does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Final Ranking Score
90%
The final ranking score once rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.