Ranking Score Explained
Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Lake Pukaki Overnight Campervan Parking.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Nick Morrison
Rankers owner
Lake Pukaki Overnight Campervan Parking
Valid Reviews
144 Valid Reviews
The Lake Pukaki Overnight Campervan Parking experience has a total of 148 reviews. There are 144 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 4 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 144 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 70 |
|
49% |
| 9/10 | 39 |
|
27% |
| 8/10 | 23 |
|
16% |
| 7/10 | 8 |
|
6% |
| 6/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
91.11% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Lake Pukaki Overnight Campervan Parking valid reviews is 91.11% and is based on 144 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
39 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 144 valid reviews, the experience has 39 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 39 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 16 |
|
41% |
| 9/10 | 10 |
|
26% |
| 8/10 | 10 |
|
26% |
| 7/10 | 3 |
|
8% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
90.00% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Lake Pukaki Overnight Campervan Parking face-to-face reviews is 90.00% and is based on 39 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
89.83%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Face-to-Face | Weight | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rick’d | 9/10 | 53 days | 99.55 | 100% | |
| Rebecca | 9/10 | 53 days | 99.55 | 100% | |
| Apichaya Srimaneemongkon | 10/10 | 53 days | 99.55 | 100% | |
| Taylor | 9/10 | 53 days | 99.55 | 100% | |
| Kipnkeri | 5/10 | 53 days | 99.55 | 100% | |
| Vicki Hoskinson | 10/10 | 84 days | 98.88 | 99% | |
| Aisling | 9/10 | 84 days | 98.88 | 99% | |
| Sunseeker | 4/10 | 84 days | 91.96 | 92% | |
| kim thomas | 10/10 | 84 days | 98.88 | 99% | |
| Stefan Miedzinski | 9/10 | 84 days | 98.88 | 99% | |
| Love Papamoa. | 9/10 | 84 days | 98.88 | 99% | |
| Tim | 9/10 | 112 days | 98.01 | 98% | |
| Marinette Kegels | 6/10 | 112 days | 98.01 | 98% | |
| Sophie | 10/10 | 112 days | 98.01 | 98% | |
| Kosala Perera | 8/10 | 112 days | 98.01 | 98% | |
| Iggy | 9/10 | 112 days | 98.01 | 98% | |
| Pedro | 9/10 | 112 days | 98.01 | 98% | |
| Jacqui | 10/10 | 143 days | 96.76 | 97% | |
| Jackie Sue | 9/10 | 143 days | 96.76 | 97% | |
| Elian Lefebvre | 9/10 | 143 days | 96.76 | 97% | |
| Anwang | 10/10 | 174 days | 95.2 | 96% | |
| Raphaele | 10/10 | 174 days | 95.2 | 96% | |
| Ymke Huisman | 10/10 | 174 days | 95.2 | 96% | |
| Martin | 9/10 | 174 days | 95.2 | 96% | |
| Dan | 9/10 | 174 days | 95.2 | 96% | |
| Cris | 10/10 | 174 days | 95.2 | 96% | |
| Matt | 10/10 | 204 days | 93.41 | 94% | |
| Meagan | 10/10 | 204 days | 93.41 | 94% | |
| Thematthew | 8/10 | 204 days | 93.41 | 94% | |
| Philip Page | 10/10 | 235 days | 91.25 | 91% | |
| Tamara & Brittany | 8/10 | 235 days | 91.25 | 91% | |
| Shay Klimo | 10/10 | 235 days | 91.25 | 91% | |
| helen reeve | 10/10 | 235 days | 91.25 | 91% | |
| Mike Fricker | 9/10 | 235 days | 91.25 | 91% | |
| Kimberly | 10/10 | 265 days | 88.87 | 89% | |
| Scooper | 10/10 | 265 days | 88.87 | 89% | |
| Louis | 9/10 | 327 days | 83.06 | 83% | |
| James Richmond | 9/10 | 327 days | 83.06 | 83% | |
| Kiri Edwards | 7/10 | 327 days | 83.06 | 83% | |
| Sue | 10/10 | 327 days | 83.06 | 83% | |
| Artem | 10/10 | 388 days | 76.14 | 76% | |
| Raylene Harvey | 10/10 | 388 days | 76.14 | 76% | |
| WeiQiang Ng | 8/10 | 388 days | 76.14 | 76% | |
| Cefa | 9/10 | 418 days | 72.31 | 72% | |
| Nicolas | 8/10 | 449 days | 68.05 | 68% | |
| David Palmer | 8/10 | 449 days | 68.05 | 68% | |
| The Farrs | 9/10 | 449 days | 68.05 | 68% | |
| Matthew Hall | 10/10 | 503 days | 59.91 | 59% | |
| Tay Dao Han | 8/10 | 524 days | 56.49 | 56% | |
| Geart-Jan Benedictus | 9/10 | 527 days | 55.99 | 55% | |
| Howard Morris | 7/10 | 601 days | 43.67 | 43% | |
| Francesca Gallagher | 10/10 | 607 days | 42.74 | 42% | |
| Gary Wu | 7/10 | 682 days | 32.03 | 31% | |
| Ann Le | 10/10 | 765 days | 22.26 | 21% | |
| Igor | 8/10 | 790 days | 19.74 | 18% | |
| Cathy Mead | 7/10 | 806 days | 18.23 | 16% | |
| Victoria Strong | 10/10 | 871 days | 12.95 | 11% | |
| Jair | 7/10 | 883 days |  |
14.55 | 13% |
| Verena Fendt | 9/10 | 887 days | 11.86 | 10% | |
| Leonie Westerhot | 10/10 | 890 days | |
13.99 | 12% |
| Madi | 9/10 | 898 days | |
13.38 | 11% |
| Frederick Yott | 9/10 | 898 days | |
13.38 | 11% |
| Greg MacFire | 10/10 | 910 days | 10.42 | 8% | |
| Pedro Cordeiru | 10/10 | 931 days | |
11.11 | 9% |
| Jude Ong | 10/10 | 934 days | 9.11 | 7% | |
| Julia Hamblyn | 10/10 | 954 days | 8.15 | 6% | |
| Puneet Mishra | 10/10 | 959 days | 7.93 | 6% | |
| Victoria Wells | 10/10 | 963 days | 7.76 | 6% | |
| Romano Turco | 10/10 | 969 days | 7.52 | 5% | |
| Shaylene Noble | 10/10 | 969 days | 7.52 | 5% | |
| Josie Gray | 10/10 | 976 days | 7.24 | 5% | |
| Tones D | 9/10 | 1057 days | 5.23 | 3% | |
| Michael Menrath | 10/10 | 1176 days | 4.89 | 3% | |
| Estelle Daniel | 9/10 | 1181 days | 4.88 | 3% | |
| Volker Stroenisch | 9/10 | 1193 days | 4.87 | 3% | |
| Jakob Gerber | 9/10 | 1207 days | 4.85 | 3% | |
| Mark Sercombe | 6/10 | 1224 days | 4.82 | 3% | |
| Sam Brydon | 10/10 | 1239 days | 4.8 | 3% | |
| Suzanne Vermeulen | 8/10 | 1300 days | 4.72 | 3% | |
| Jennifer Brown | 10/10 | 1300 days | 4.72 | 3% | |
| Shanae Andrews | 10/10 | 1365 days | 4.63 | 2% | |
| Yann Le Gac | 8/10 | 1484 days | 4.47 | 2% | |
| Allyson Taylor | 9/10 | 1538 days | 4.39 | 2% | |
| Julia | 10/10 | 1545 days | 4.38 | 2% | |
| Sarah Good | 10/10 | 1588 days | 4.32 | 2% | |
| Manolis Pavlakis | 9/10 | 1604 days | 4.3 | 2% | |
| Sina Leidig | 9/10 | 1665 days | 4.22 | 2% | |
| Daniel Jarrett | 10/10 | 1696 days | 4.18 | 2% | |
| kim | 10/10 | 1726 days | 4.14 | 2% | |
| Moley | 10/10 | 1757 days | 4.09 | 2% | |
| Lindsay Berquist | 8/10 | 1849 days | 3.97 | 2% | |
| Shona MacDonald | 9/10 | 1876 days | |
4.72 | 3% |
| Ane Didriksen | 9/10 | 1876 days | |
4.72 | 3% |
| Iris Anette Berger | 10/10 | 1876 days | |
4.72 | 3% |
| Caroline Hennache | 9/10 | 1878 days | |
4.71 | 3% |
| isabel Zander | 9/10 | 1878 days | |
4.71 | 3% |
| Calvin Becker | 10/10 | 1878 days | |
4.71 | 3% |
| Claudia | 10/10 | 1879 days | 3.93 | 2% | |
| Jeroen Suijlang | 10/10 | 1883 days | |
4.7 | 3% |
| Helen Olsson | 7/10 | 1886 days | |
4.7 | 3% |
| Hanna Liebe | 8/10 | 1893 days | |
4.69 | 3% |
| Niamh Duane | 10/10 | 1893 days | |
4.69 | 3% |
| Andreas Liebe | 8/10 | 1893 days | |
4.69 | 3% |
| Svenja Trubenbach | 10/10 | 1894 days | |
4.69 | 2% |
| Florent Bouillon | 8/10 | 1907 days | |
4.67 | 2% |
| Linda Wainman | 9/10 | 1907 days | |
4.67 | 2% |
| Chris Wainman | 8/10 | 1907 days | |
4.67 | 2% |
| Simon Galpin | 9/10 | 1908 days | |
4.66 | 2% |
| Benoit Irissou | 8/10 | 1910 days | |
4.66 | 2% |
| Igor | 7/10 | 1910 days | |
4.66 | 2% |
| Hadar | 9/10 | 1914 days | |
4.65 | 2% |
| Bill | 10/10 | 1936 days | |
4.62 | 2% |
| Trish Saunders | 10/10 | 1962 days | |
4.57 | 2% |
| Kath Tonkin | 8/10 | 1962 days | |
4.57 | 2% |
| celie Mcquair | 10/10 | 1975 days | |
4.55 | 2% |
| Bjorn Van Mulders | 10/10 | 1979 days | |
4.55 | 2% |
| Simon Wagner | 10/10 | 2000 days | 3.76 | 2% | |
| Tim J | 9/10 | 2000 days | 3.76 | 2% | |
| Helene & Peter | 8/10 | 2030 days | 3.72 | 2% | |
| Kiwix3 | 10/10 | 2061 days | 3.68 | 1% | |
| Pokari | 10/10 | 2061 days | 3.68 | 1% | |
| Robin Hales | 10/10 | 2061 days | 3.68 | 1% | |
| Nigel & Annie Dale | 10/10 | 2061 days | 3.68 | 1% | |
| Steve Warren | 10/10 | 2091 days | 3.64 | 1% | |
| Jay Sorrell | 10/10 | 2091 days | 3.64 | 1% | |
| Team Kim&James | 9/10 | 2122 days | 3.59 | 1% | |
| Mette, Bo, Viktor & Olivia Seligmann | 10/10 | 2244 days | 3.43 | 1% | |
| ramy | 10/10 | 2244 days | 3.43 | 1% | |
| Michael Heuer | 8/10 | 2252 days | |
4.1 | 2% |
| Marco Schmidt | 10/10 | 2254 days | |
4.09 | 2% |
| Christian Schumacher | 10/10 | 2254 days | |
4.09 | 2% |
| Arno Leleu | 9/10 | 2284 days | |
4.05 | 2% |
| Loesje | 10/10 | 2334 days | 3.3 | 1% | |
| rich kiimmii | 7/10 | 2334 days | 3.3 | 1% | |
| C'est_Tina | 10/10 | 2334 days | 3.3 | 1% | |
| mirimirik | 10/10 | 2365 days | 3.26 | 1% | |
| phudgb | 10/10 | 2426 days | 3.18 | 1% | |
| Rob Gill | 8/10 | 2653 days | |
3.44 | 1% |
| Graeme | 8/10 | 2700 days | 2.8 | 1% | |
| Jesper Hassel | 8/10 | 3011 days | |
2.85 | 1% |
| Victoria Slater | 10/10 | 3345 days | |
2.3 | 0% |
| Marg | 8/10 | 3346 days | |
2.3 | 0% |
| Ina | 10/10 | 3358 days | |
2.28 | 0% |
| Nicky and Andy Prescott | 10/10 | 3373 days | |
2.26 | 0% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Lake Pukaki Overnight Campervan Parking does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Final Ranking Score
90%
The final ranking score once rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.