Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Rays Rest Camping Reserve.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Rays Rest Camping Reserve

Valid Reviews

54 Valid Reviews

The Rays Rest Camping Reserve experience has a total of 56 reviews. There are 54 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Within these 54 valid reviews, the experience has 3 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 54 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 22
41%
9/10 14
26%
8/10 11
20%
7/10 7
13%
6/10 0
0%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

89.44% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Rays Rest Camping Reserve valid reviews is 89.44% and is based on 54 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Weighted Average

96.33%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Sophia Seaton 10/10 110 days 100%
Betty Anne 10/10 201 days 98%
Jan 10/10 291 days 96%
Lisa 9/10 536 days 83%
Amanda 10/10 687 days 74%
Kev 10/10 717 days 71%
Logan 10/10 1206 days 27%
sarah penney 10/10 1297 days 21%
ellie 7/10 1297 days 19%
iona.catley@hotmail.co.uk 9/10 1328 days 19%
Helen E 10/10 1328 days 19%
Happy Campers 10/10 1479 days 12%
Matt 10/10 1693 days 6%
Sebastian Stoof 8/10 1783 days 5%
Alex 8/10 1936 days 5%
Kirsty B 10/10 2117 days 4%
Tyler 9/10 2117 days 4%
Laura 10/10 2331 days 4%
Javier Williams 10/10 2514 days 4%
Bakers 8/10 2605 days 3%
Kirstie Gallant 8/10 2789 days 3%
thong family 7/10 2817 days 3%
TP&MM 9/10 2817 days 3%
Trent 7/10 2940 days 3%
Sharon 9/10 2970 days 3%
ascotandanaussie 8/10 3123 days 2%
Sinkbli 8/10 3154 days 2%
Jim Harding 9/10 3168 days 2%
Debbie Harding 8/10 3174 days 2%
orit almog 9/10 3182 days 2%
Eversons 10/10 3182 days 2%
Jan Hiltermann 7/10 3252 days 2%
Vander Plancke Julien 7/10 3266 days 2%
Anna Brzezińska Talaga 10/10 3519 days 2%
Gena Bond 10/10 3535 days 2%
Jason Stalgis 9/10 3540 days 2%
Leigh Dodds 8/10 3666 days 1%
Stuart Morgan 10/10 3674 days 1%
Laurie 10/10 3675 days 1%
Tony Waters 9/10 3700 days 1%
Henny Lee 10/10 3772 days 1%
renee verwey 9/10 3907 days 1%
Ron Mollica 10/10 3944 days 1%
Robert Jones 9/10 3991 days 1%
Elisabeth Tartler 10/10 4197 days 0%
Tony Grantham 7/10 4217 days 0%
Ricky Shepherd 7/10 4318 days 0%
Garry Renton 8/10 4591 days 0%
Alex Artigues 9/10 4677 days 0%
Serge Garcin 9/10 4677 days 0%
Team Kim&James 9/10 4827 days 1%
FlyingKiwiGirl 8/10 4980 days 1%
Henry Howard 10/10 5039 days 1%
Hanna_Malte 8/10 5345 days 1%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Rays Rest Camping Reserve does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

0.31% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

97%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.