G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Rays Rest Camping Reserve.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Rays Rest Camping Reserve

Valid Reviews

54 Valid Reviews

The Rays Rest Camping Reserve experience has a total of 56 reviews. There are 54 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Within these 54 valid reviews, the experience has 3 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 54 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 22
41%
9/10 14
26%
8/10 11
20%
7/10 7
13%
6/10 0
0%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

89.44% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Rays Rest Camping Reserve valid reviews is 89.44% and is based on 54 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Weighted Average

96.23%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Sophia Seaton 10/10 49 days 100%
Betty Anne 10/10 140 days 99%
Jan 10/10 230 days 97%
Lisa 9/10 475 days 86%
Amanda 10/10 626 days 78%
Kev 10/10 656 days 75%
Logan 10/10 1145 days 31%
sarah penney 10/10 1236 days 25%
ellie 7/10 1236 days 23%
iona.catley@hotmail.co.uk 9/10 1267 days 22%
Helen E 10/10 1267 days 23%
Happy Campers 10/10 1418 days 14%
Matt 10/10 1632 days 7%
Sebastian Stoof 8/10 1722 days 5%
Alex 8/10 1875 days 5%
Kirsty B 10/10 2056 days 4%
Tyler 9/10 2056 days 4%
Laura 10/10 2270 days 4%
Javier Williams 10/10 2453 days 4%
Bakers 8/10 2544 days 3%
Kirstie Gallant 8/10 2728 days 3%
thong family 7/10 2756 days 3%
TP&MM 9/10 2756 days 3%
Trent 7/10 2879 days 3%
Sharon 9/10 2909 days 3%
ascotandanaussie 8/10 3062 days 2%
Sinkbli 8/10 3093 days 2%
Jim Harding 9/10 3107 days 2%
Debbie Harding 8/10 3113 days 2%
orit almog 9/10 3121 days 2%
Eversons 10/10 3121 days 2%
Jan Hiltermann 7/10 3191 days 2%
Vander Plancke Julien 7/10 3205 days 2%
Anna Brzezińska Talaga 10/10 3458 days 2%
Gena Bond 10/10 3474 days 2%
Jason Stalgis 9/10 3479 days 2%
Leigh Dodds 8/10 3605 days 1%
Stuart Morgan 10/10 3613 days 1%
Laurie 10/10 3614 days 1%
Tony Waters 9/10 3639 days 1%
Henny Lee 10/10 3711 days 1%
renee verwey 9/10 3846 days 1%
Ron Mollica 10/10 3883 days 1%
Robert Jones 9/10 3930 days 1%
Elisabeth Tartler 10/10 4136 days 0%
Tony Grantham 7/10 4156 days 0%
Ricky Shepherd 7/10 4257 days 0%
Garry Renton 8/10 4530 days 0%
Alex Artigues 9/10 4616 days 0%
Serge Garcin 9/10 4616 days 0%
Team Kim&James 9/10 4766 days 1%
FlyingKiwiGirl 8/10 4919 days 1%
Henry Howard 10/10 4978 days 1%
Hanna_Malte 8/10 5284 days 1%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Rays Rest Camping Reserve does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

0.32% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

97%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.