G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Rays Rest Camping Reserve.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Rays Rest Camping Reserve

Valid Reviews

54 Valid Reviews

The Rays Rest Camping Reserve experience has a total of 56 reviews. There are 54 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Within these 54 valid reviews, the experience has 3 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 54 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 22
41%
9/10 14
26%
8/10 11
20%
7/10 7
13%
6/10 0
0%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

89.44% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Rays Rest Camping Reserve valid reviews is 89.44% and is based on 54 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Weighted Average

96.20%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Sophia Seaton 10/10 30 days 100%
Betty Anne 10/10 121 days 99%
Jan 10/10 211 days 98%
Lisa 9/10 456 days 87%
Amanda 10/10 607 days 79%
Kev 10/10 637 days 77%
Logan 10/10 1126 days 33%
sarah penney 10/10 1217 days 26%
ellie 7/10 1217 days 24%
iona.catley@hotmail.co.uk 9/10 1248 days 24%
Helen E 10/10 1248 days 24%
Happy Campers 10/10 1399 days 15%
Matt 10/10 1613 days 7%
Sebastian Stoof 8/10 1703 days 5%
Alex 8/10 1856 days 5%
Kirsty B 10/10 2037 days 4%
Tyler 9/10 2037 days 4%
Laura 10/10 2251 days 4%
Javier Williams 10/10 2434 days 4%
Bakers 8/10 2525 days 3%
Kirstie Gallant 8/10 2709 days 3%
thong family 7/10 2737 days 3%
TP&MM 9/10 2737 days 3%
Trent 7/10 2860 days 3%
Sharon 9/10 2890 days 3%
ascotandanaussie 8/10 3043 days 2%
Sinkbli 8/10 3074 days 2%
Jim Harding 9/10 3088 days 2%
Debbie Harding 8/10 3094 days 2%
orit almog 9/10 3102 days 2%
Eversons 10/10 3102 days 2%
Jan Hiltermann 7/10 3172 days 2%
Vander Plancke Julien 7/10 3186 days 2%
Anna Brzezińska Talaga 10/10 3439 days 2%
Gena Bond 10/10 3455 days 2%
Jason Stalgis 9/10 3460 days 2%
Leigh Dodds 8/10 3586 days 1%
Stuart Morgan 10/10 3594 days 1%
Laurie 10/10 3595 days 1%
Tony Waters 9/10 3620 days 1%
Henny Lee 10/10 3692 days 1%
renee verwey 9/10 3827 days 1%
Ron Mollica 10/10 3864 days 1%
Robert Jones 9/10 3911 days 1%
Elisabeth Tartler 10/10 4117 days 0%
Tony Grantham 7/10 4137 days 0%
Ricky Shepherd 7/10 4238 days 0%
Garry Renton 8/10 4511 days 0%
Alex Artigues 9/10 4597 days 0%
Serge Garcin 9/10 4597 days 0%
Team Kim&James 9/10 4747 days 1%
FlyingKiwiGirl 8/10 4900 days 1%
Henry Howard 10/10 4959 days 1%
Hanna_Malte 8/10 5265 days 1%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Rays Rest Camping Reserve does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

0.32% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

97%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.