Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Dive North.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at firstname.lastname@example.org. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
96 Valid Reviews
The Dive North experience has a total of 96 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Within these 96 valid reviews, the experience has 2 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 96 valid reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Dive North valid reviews is 99.69% and is based on 96 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
|Michael Halligan||10/10||847 days||14.75||100%|
|Marianne Leclerco||10/10||913 days||12.3||80%|
|Steven Goossens||10/10||939 days||8.86||53%|
|Chris Ru||10/10||939 days||8.86||53%|
|Christin Winter||10/10||939 days||8.86||53%|
|Maud Eskes||10/10||1000 days||6.43||33%|
|Brooke Dees||10/10||1000 days||6.43||33%|
|Johanna Mabille||10/10||1031 days||5.65||27%|
|Felix Eberhard||10/10||1092 days||5.0||22%|
|Danny Hughes||10/10||1153 days||4.92||21%|
|Lee Gilson||10/10||1153 days||4.92||21%|
|Magalie Gilles||10/10||1153 days||4.92||21%|
|Anthony Baker||10/10||1153 days||4.92||21%|
|Matthew Durham||10/10||1153 days||4.92||21%|
|Weston Newman||10/10||1153 days||4.92||21%|
|Lydia Downey||10/10||1184 days||4.88||21%|
|Jon S||10/10||1184 days||4.88||21%|
|Kevin Hopper||10/10||1212 days||4.84||20%|
|Marion Butz||10/10||1212 days||4.84||20%|
|James Martin||10/10||1243 days||4.8||20%|
|Joel Tennant||10/10||1243 days||4.8||20%|
|Dominique Brandl||10/10||1304 days||4.71||19%|
|Christine Zumbeck||10/10||1304 days||4.71||19%|
|Philip Ayles||10/10||1335 days||4.67||19%|
|Gunther Kothen||10/10||1518 days||4.42||17%|
|Charli & Ben||10/10||1518 days||4.42||17%|
|Dave Macleod||10/10||1518 days||4.42||17%|
|rick kaminer||10/10||1577 days||4.34||16%|
|Josch Beh||10/10||1577 days||4.34||16%|
|Matthew Blaikie||10/10||1577 days||4.34||16%|
|Mandy Dawson||9/10||1577 days||4.34||16%|
|Tess Idiens||10/10||1608 days||4.3||16%|
|Mikaël Krummen||10/10||1608 days||4.3||16%|
|Brian Barnard||10/10||1700 days||4.17||15%|
|sebastian krause||10/10||1792 days||4.05||14%|
|Annika Strönisch||10/10||1792 days||4.05||14%|
|Sarah Ling||10/10||1822 days||4.0||14%|
|Lydia Lowe||10/10||1853 days||3.96||13%|
|Debbie hogan||10/10||1883 days||3.92||13%|
|Ellen Herrlin||10/10||1883 days||3.92||13%|
|david kirk||10/10||1914 days||3.88||13%|
|Bhakti Patel||10/10||1942 days||3.84||12%|
|Amy Coolidge||10/10||1942 days||3.84||12%|
|Don Mueller||10/10||1942 days||3.84||12%|
|Katie Morgan||10/10||1973 days||3.8||12%|
|barbara nielsen||10/10||1973 days||3.8||12%|
|Stine Bøttern||10/10||1973 days||3.8||12%|
|christie wood||10/10||2004 days||3.75||12%|
|Malcolm Glad||9/10||3023 days||2.83||4%|
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Dive North experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
There may be an adjustment if an experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 60 days. However the Dive North experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 364 days.
The Dive North experience has been adjusted for 364 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
The final ranking score once adjustments and rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at email@example.com.