Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Cape Palliser Seal Colony and Lighthouse.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at firstname.lastname@example.org. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
45 Valid Reviews
The Cape Palliser Seal Colony and Lighthouse experience has a total of 45 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 45 valid reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Cape Palliser Seal Colony and Lighthouse valid reviews is 93.33% and is based on 45 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
38 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
Within the 45 valid reviews, the experience has 38 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 38 face-to-face reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Cape Palliser Seal Colony and Lighthouse face-to-face reviews is 92.37% and is based on 38 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
|Chris Arnold||8/10||422 days||100%|
|Dan Schmidt||9/10||428 days||99%|
|Lucie Revay||10/10||451 days||78%|
|Belinda Ziswiler||10/10||471 days||90%|
|Jade Williams||10/10||502 days||83%|
|Miroslav Bazala||10/10||710 days||31%|
|Sophie Rosenberg||10/10||721 days||36%|
|Clara Guinard||9/10||748 days||31%|
|Adam Pulkrabek||10/10||755 days||30%|
|Olga Barathova||10/10||755 days||30%|
|Luisa Birkel||8/10||756 days||30%|
|Lili Souris||9/10||760 days||29%|
|Andy Burfoot||10/10||774 days||27%|
|Sophia Harnisch||8/10||783 days||26%|
|Pierre Mattes||9/10||783 days||26%|
|Martina Cervenkova||10/10||786 days||26%|
|Sabina Roubickova||10/10||790 days||25%|
|Grischa Rodust||9/10||829 days||20%|
|Richard Thompson||10/10||903 days||10%|
|Michal Kamradek||9/10||1186 days||4%|
|Vanessa Leverrier||9/10||1201 days||4%|
|Camille Bellay||8/10||1453 days||3%|
|Christopher Buch Madsen||10/10||1477 days||3%|
|Stephen Revah||10/10||1479 days||3%|
|Julie Ledanois||10/10||1493 days||3%|
|Toke Frederiksen||8/10||1505 days||3%|
|Dan Lawson||10/10||1522 days||3%|
|Hendrik Schanz||10/10||1534 days||3%|
|David Restell||10/10||1725 days||2%|
|Mike and Caroline||10/10||1816 days||1%|
|Ton Martens||10/10||1838 days||2%|
|Sebastian and Peter Beate||10/10||1870 days||2%|
|Darina Kvasnicova||9/10||2214 days||2%|
|De Blaeij||9/10||2604 days||1%|
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Cape Palliser Seal Colony and Lighthouse does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
The final ranking score once rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at email@example.com.