Ranking Score Explained
Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Sandfly Bay Track.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Sandfly Bay Track
Valid Reviews
58 Valid Reviews
The Sandfly Bay Track experience has a total of 58 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 58 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 27 |
|
47% |
| 9/10 | 17 |
|
29% |
| 8/10 | 11 |
|
19% |
| 7/10 | 3 |
|
5% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
91.72% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Sandfly Bay Track valid reviews is 91.72% and is based on 58 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
46 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 58 valid reviews, the experience has 46 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 46 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 19 |
|
41% |
| 9/10 | 15 |
|
33% |
| 8/10 | 10 |
|
22% |
| 7/10 | 2 |
|
4% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
91.09% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Sandfly Bay Track face-to-face reviews is 91.09% and is based on 46 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
96.50%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Face-to-Face | Weight | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Susanne | 10/10 | 151 days | 96.39 | 100% | |
| Frankie | 10/10 | 424 days | 71.51 | 74% | |
| xavier MICHEL | 10/10 | 486 days | 62.57 | 65% | |
| Melinda Pyke | 10/10 | 577 days | 47.52 | 49% | |
| S Weslake | 8/10 | 730 days | 24.81 | 26% | |
| Damien Bernard | 10/10 | 1134 days |  |
4.92 | 5% |
| Fabian Probst | 9/10 | 1159 days | |
4.87 | 5% |
| Myriam Ackermann | 9/10 | 1159 days | |
4.87 | 5% |
| Eveet De Beleir | 9/10 | 1197 days | |
4.8 | 5% |
| Ilona Roeters | 9/10 | 1197 days | |
4.8 | 5% |
| Sylvie Martel | 10/10 | 1204 days | 4.79 | 5% | |
| Vallee Manon | 8/10 | 1204 days | |
4.55 | 5% |
| Laia Pujol | 10/10 | 1206 days | |
4.78 | 5% |
| Gessica | 10/10 | 1479 days | |
4.25 | 4% |
| Lili Souris | 10/10 | 1500 days | |
4.21 | 4% |
| Sven and Annie | 9/10 | 1533 days | |
4.14 | 4% |
| Steffen and Johannes | 8/10 | 1570 days | |
3.87 | 4% |
| Ella Gilmer | 9/10 | 1825 days | 3.57 | 4% | |
| Sofie Jebsen | 9/10 | 1846 days | |
3.53 | 4% |
| Tobias | 9/10 | 1846 days | |
3.53 | 4% |
| Isabelle | 9/10 | 1903 days | |
3.42 | 4% |
| Matthias Thorn | 9/10 | 1915 days | 3.4 | 4% | |
| Jesper Henriksen | 7/10 | 2217 days | |
2.55 | 3% |
| Julien de la lande | 7/10 | 2263 days | |
2.47 | 3% |
| Aude Moulin | 9/10 | 2263 days | |
2.71 | 3% |
| celie Mcquair | 10/10 | 2287 days | |
2.67 | 3% |
| Tan | 10/10 | 2403 days | 2.44 | 3% | |
| Katharina Littlemann | 10/10 | 2599 days | |
2.06 | 2% |
| M Natterser | 8/10 | 2665 days | |
1.83 | 2% |
| Knorr Bracher | 10/10 | 2681 days | |
1.9 | 2% |
| Dagette | 10/10 | 2738 days | 1.78 | 2% | |
| Margreet Hanemaaijer | 8/10 | 2938 days | |
1.32 | 1% |
| Hilbert vanEssen | 8/10 | 2949 days | |
1.3 | 1% |
| Pete & Pat Etheridge | 10/10 | 2961 days | |
1.35 | 1% |
| Devon Urlacher | 8/10 | 2975 days | |
1.25 | 1% |
| Fairouz | 7/10 | 3012 days | 1.14 | 1% | |
| Lydia McLean | 9/10 | 3059 days | |
1.16 | 1% |
| Jasmin Loeffler | 10/10 | 3263 days | |
0.76 | 1% |
| Rocipon | 10/10 | 3301 days | |
0.68 | 1% |
| Juliane Kleiu | 8/10 | 3308 days | |
0.64 | 1% |
| Chris | 10/10 | 3312 days | |
0.66 | 1% |
| Anne & Robert | 10/10 | 3346 days | |
0.59 | 1% |
| dollimyxture | 10/10 | 3377 days | 0.53 | 1% | |
| davidm239 | 9/10 | 3622 days | |
0.05 | 0% |
| jenniferuk | 8/10 | 3622 days | |
0.05 | 0% |
| Risch & Seybold | 8/10 | 3665 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Paula Martinez | 10/10 | 3686 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| John Cox | 9/10 | 3689 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Nicola | 9/10 | 3692 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Loleit | 10/10 | 3704 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Johanna X | 10/10 | 3706 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| martinab | 10/10 | 3757 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Werner Zuis | 10/10 | 3758 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| koellner | 9/10 | 3771 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Artur D | 10/10 | 3775 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Myriauy Rito | 8/10 | 3781 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Emma-Louise Vetriano | 10/10 | 3783 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| MiepS | 9/10 | 4005 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Sandfly Bay Track does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Final Ranking Score
96%
The final ranking score once rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.