Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Cape Farewell Walk.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at email@example.com. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
45 Valid Reviews
The Cape Farewell Walk experience has a total of 45 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 45 valid reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Cape Farewell Walk valid reviews is 88.22% and is based on 45 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
44 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
Within the 45 valid reviews, the experience has 44 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 44 face-to-face reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Cape Farewell Walk face-to-face reviews is 87.95% and is based on 44 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
|Jacques Scohy||8/10||774 days||25.59||100%|
|Tereza Bulova||10/10||783 days||24.51||95%|
|Ondres S||9/10||783 days||24.51||95%|
|Bernd Giermann||9/10||802 days||22.32||86%|
|Sammy Kerrod||8/10||833 days||19.05||72%|
|Leonie Brabers||8/10||865 days||16.06||59%|
|Franco Panizza||8/10||1084 days||6.02||16%|
|Nele Foerske||10/10||1090 days||6.0||16%|
|Leopold Kern||9/10||1090 days||6.0||16%|
|Katharina Miehling||10/10||1090 days||6.0||16%|
|Valentine de Beer||8/10||1091 days||6.0||16%|
|Jacquet Ombeline||10/10||1091 days||6.0||16%|
|Anika Danits||9/10||1100 days||5.99||16%|
|Heidi et Mat||10/10||1106 days||5.98||16%|
|Isabella Sinnesbickle||8/10||1122 days||5.96||16%|
|Alice and James||9/10||1154 days||5.9||16%|
|Brandon Patton||6/10||1159 days||5.89||15%|
|Iris Kerbler||10/10||1161 days||5.89||15%|
|Sascha Kaffenberger||8/10||1166 days||5.88||15%|
|Claudia Hornig||9/10||1171 days||5.88||15%|
|Steffen & Steffen||8/10||1194 days||5.84||15%|
|gita feichtingerova||10/10||1194 days||5.84||15%|
|Carolin Siegert||10/10||1825 days||4.8||11%|
|Maxime Ripoche||7/10||1857 days||4.75||11%|
|Hendrik Schanz||4/10||1900 days||4.4||9%|
|Philip Gosemann||8/10||1900 days||4.68||10%|
|Adrien Godeloup||10/10||1905 days||4.67||10%|
|Przemystaw Tymizyszyn||10/10||2217 days||4.16||8%|
|Christina Rodewald||9/10||2246 days||4.11||8%|
|Sandra Dirk||8/10||2570 days||3.58||6%|
|Rainer Schnell||10/10||2599 days||3.53||5%|
|Anita Tonks||9/10||2943 days||2.96||3%|
|Meriel & Paul Best||9/10||2968 days||2.92||3%|
|Adam Gerrard||6/10||3239 days||2.48||1%|
|Sandy Doodson||9/10||3351 days||2.29||0%|
|Peter Tres||10/10||3352 days||2.29||0%|
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Cape Farewell Walk does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
The final ranking score once rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at firstname.lastname@example.org.