Ranking Score Explained

Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Ambury Park Camping Ground.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Nick Morrison's avatar

Nick Morrison

Rankers owner

Ambury Park Camping Ground

Valid Reviews

34 Valid Reviews

The Ambury Park Camping Ground experience has a total of 35 reviews. There are 34 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Within these 34 valid reviews, the experience has 1 face-to-face review collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 34 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 4
9/10 2
8/10 10
7/10 11
6/10 1
5/10 2
4/10 1
3/10 2
2/10 1
1/10 0

71.47% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Ambury Park Camping Ground valid reviews is 71.47% and is based on 34 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Weighted Average


Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Martin Hansen 7/10 524 days 100%
D&R 3/10 554 days 77%
Nate 7/10 677 days 57%
QueeenBeee 10/10 766 days 42%
Steve 10/10 828 days 30%
JL Canada 2/10 950 days 10%
Emily 8/10 1072 days 8%
Derek Gillard 7/10 1103 days 7%
Laura 5/10 1103 days 6%
Nat 8/10 1103 days 7%
Ben H 6/10 1103 days 6%
Lewis Milnes 7/10 1183 days 7%
Max Gunnarsson 7/10 1564 days 5%
Ernst Mayerhofer 8/10 1584 days 6%
Michelle Smit 8/10 1680 days 5%
Gordon Lee 8/10 1768 days 5%
Jeremy Wienert 7/10 1796 days 5%
Kirstyn Wallace 7/10 1883 days 4%
Ken Balfour 8/10 1890 days 2%
Kresten Skak 9/10 1911 days 5%
Christina Sperling 3/10 1924 days 3%
Philipp Weber 4/10 1963 days 3%
Ben Apellido 7/10 2015 days 4%
Christine Slowiak 5/10 2076 days 3%
Victoria Byrnes 7/10 2095 days 4%
Lara Banane 8/10 2199 days 3%
Jean-Claude Escutary 7/10 2227 days 3%
Ian 8/10 2258 days 3%
Ian Watson 8/10 2280 days 3%
Sidney Stokkers 8/10 2289 days 3%
Hannah 9/10 2623 days 2%
auré bis 7/10 2898 days 1%
Puravida 10/10 3719 days 0%
Cymen Crick 10/10 3750 days 0%


No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Ambury Park Camping Ground does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Final Ranking Score


The final ranking score once rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.