Hey, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Ambury Park Camping Ground.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Ambury Park Camping Ground

Valid Reviews

49 Valid Reviews

The Ambury Park Camping Ground experience has a total of 50 reviews. There are 49 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Within these 49 valid reviews, the experience has 1 face-to-face review collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 49 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 9
18%
9/10 5
10%
8/10 14
29%
7/10 12
24%
6/10 1
2%
5/10 4
8%
4/10 1
2%
3/10 2
4%
2/10 1
2%
1/10 0
0%

75.31% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Ambury Park Camping Ground valid reviews is 75.31% and is based on 49 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Weighted Average

82.10%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Cam 9/10 612 days 100%
Fabienne 5/10 1009 days 42%
Sandie 9/10 1070 days 48%
Nico 8/10 1101 days 44%
James 8/10 1254 days 30%
Becks 5/10 1284 days 21%
James Kidston 10/10 1315 days 25%
Joel Ross 7/10 1315 days 24%
Helen E 9/10 1315 days 25%
Neleski 8/10 1343 days 23%
Nathan 10/10 1343 days 23%
Kellie 10/10 1405 days 19%
JMS 10/10 1466 days 16%
cearon 10/10 1619 days 9%
Laura D 8/10 1738 days 7%
Martin Hansen 7/10 2562 days 4%
D&R 3/10 2592 days 2%
Nate 7/10 2715 days 4%
QueeenBeee 10/10 2804 days 4%
Steve 10/10 2866 days 4%
JL Canada 2/10 2988 days 1%
Emily 8/10 3110 days 3%
Derek Gillard 7/10 3141 days 3%
Laura 5/10 3141 days 2%
Nat 8/10 3141 days 3%
Ben H 6/10 3141 days 3%
Lewis Milnes 7/10 3221 days 3%
Max Gunnarsson 7/10 3602 days 2%
Ernst Mayerhofer 8/10 3622 days 2%
Michelle Smit 8/10 3717 days 2%
Gordon Lee 8/10 3806 days 1%
Jeremy Wienert 7/10 3834 days 1%
Kirstyn Wallace 7/10 3921 days 1%
Ken Balfour 8/10 3928 days 1%
Kresten Skak 9/10 3949 days 1%
Christina Sperling 3/10 3961 days 0%
Philipp Weber 4/10 4001 days 0%
Ben Apellido 7/10 4052 days 1%
Christine Slowiak 5/10 4114 days 0%
Victoria Byrnes 7/10 4133 days 0%
Lara Banane 8/10 4237 days 0%
Jean-Claude Escutary 7/10 4265 days 0%
Ian 8/10 4295 days 0%
Ian Watson 8/10 4318 days 0%
Sidney Stokkers 8/10 4326 days 0%
Hannah 9/10 4661 days 1%
auré bis 7/10 4936 days 1%
Puravida 10/10 5757 days 1%
Cymen Crick 10/10 5788 days 1%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Ambury Park Camping Ground does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

2.46% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

85%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.