Ranking Score Explained

Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Ambury Park Camping Ground.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Ambury Park Camping Ground

Valid Reviews

48 Valid Reviews

The Ambury Park Camping Ground experience has a total of 49 reviews. There are 48 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Within these 48 valid reviews, the experience has 1 face-to-face review collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 48 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 9
19%
9/10 4
8%
8/10 14
29%
7/10 12
25%
6/10 1
2%
5/10 4
8%
4/10 1
2%
3/10 2
4%
2/10 1
2%
1/10 0
0%

75.00% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Ambury Park Camping Ground valid reviews is 75.00% and is based on 48 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Weighted Average

82.79%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Fabienne 5/10 381 days 79%
Sandie 9/10 442 days 100%
Nico 8/10 473 days 97%
James 8/10 626 days 86%
Becks 5/10 656 days 65%
James Kidston 10/10 687 days 83%
Joel Ross 7/10 687 days 77%
Helen E 9/10 687 days 82%
Neleski 8/10 715 days 79%
Nathan 10/10 715 days 80%
Kellie 10/10 777 days 74%
JMS 10/10 838 days 68%
cearon 10/10 991 days 51%
Laura D 8/10 1111 days 38%
Martin Hansen 7/10 1934 days 5%
D&R 3/10 1964 days 3%
Nate 7/10 2087 days 5%
QueeenBeee 10/10 2176 days 5%
Steve 10/10 2238 days 5%
JL Canada 2/10 2360 days 2%
Emily 8/10 2482 days 4%
Derek Gillard 7/10 2513 days 4%
Laura 5/10 2513 days 3%
Nat 8/10 2513 days 4%
Ben H 6/10 2513 days 3%
Lewis Milnes 7/10 2593 days 4%
Max Gunnarsson 7/10 2974 days 3%
Ernst Mayerhofer 8/10 2994 days 3%
Michelle Smit 8/10 3090 days 3%
Gordon Lee 8/10 3178 days 2%
Jeremy Wienert 7/10 3206 days 2%
Kirstyn Wallace 7/10 3293 days 2%
Ken Balfour 8/10 3300 days 1%
Kresten Skak 9/10 3321 days 2%
Christina Sperling 3/10 3334 days 1%
Philipp Weber 4/10 3373 days 1%
Ben Apellido 7/10 3425 days 2%
Christine Slowiak 5/10 3486 days 1%
Victoria Byrnes 7/10 3505 days 2%
Lara Banane 8/10 3609 days 2%
Jean-Claude Escutary 7/10 3637 days 1%
Ian 8/10 3668 days 1%
Ian Watson 8/10 3690 days 1%
Sidney Stokkers 8/10 3699 days 1%
Hannah 9/10 4033 days 1%
auré bis 7/10 4308 days 0%
Puravida 10/10 5129 days 1%
Cymen Crick 10/10 5160 days 1%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Ambury Park Camping Ground does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

2.29% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

85%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.