G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Ambury Park Camping Ground.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Ambury Park Camping Ground

Valid Reviews

49 Valid Reviews

The Ambury Park Camping Ground experience has a total of 50 reviews. There are 49 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Within these 49 valid reviews, the experience has 1 face-to-face review collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 49 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 9
18%
9/10 5
10%
8/10 14
29%
7/10 12
24%
6/10 1
2%
5/10 4
8%
4/10 1
2%
3/10 2
4%
2/10 1
2%
1/10 0
0%

75.31% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Ambury Park Camping Ground valid reviews is 75.31% and is based on 49 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Weighted Average

82.08%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Cam 9/10 632 days 100%
Fabienne 5/10 1029 days 41%
Sandie 9/10 1090 days 46%
Nico 8/10 1121 days 43%
James 8/10 1274 days 29%
Becks 5/10 1304 days 20%
James Kidston 10/10 1335 days 24%
Joel Ross 7/10 1335 days 23%
Helen E 9/10 1335 days 24%
Neleski 8/10 1363 days 22%
Nathan 10/10 1363 days 22%
Kellie 10/10 1425 days 18%
JMS 10/10 1486 days 15%
cearon 10/10 1639 days 9%
Laura D 8/10 1759 days 7%
Martin Hansen 7/10 2582 days 4%
D&R 3/10 2612 days 2%
Nate 7/10 2735 days 4%
QueeenBeee 10/10 2824 days 4%
Steve 10/10 2886 days 4%
JL Canada 2/10 3008 days 2%
Emily 8/10 3130 days 3%
Derek Gillard 7/10 3161 days 3%
Laura 5/10 3161 days 2%
Nat 8/10 3161 days 3%
Ben H 6/10 3161 days 3%
Lewis Milnes 7/10 3241 days 3%
Max Gunnarsson 7/10 3622 days 2%
Ernst Mayerhofer 8/10 3642 days 2%
Michelle Smit 8/10 3738 days 2%
Gordon Lee 8/10 3826 days 1%
Jeremy Wienert 7/10 3854 days 1%
Kirstyn Wallace 7/10 3941 days 1%
Ken Balfour 8/10 3948 days 1%
Kresten Skak 9/10 3969 days 1%
Christina Sperling 3/10 3982 days 0%
Philipp Weber 4/10 4021 days 1%
Ben Apellido 7/10 4073 days 1%
Christine Slowiak 5/10 4134 days 0%
Victoria Byrnes 7/10 4153 days 0%
Lara Banane 8/10 4257 days 0%
Jean-Claude Escutary 7/10 4285 days 0%
Ian 8/10 4316 days 0%
Ian Watson 8/10 4338 days 0%
Sidney Stokkers 8/10 4347 days 0%
Hannah 9/10 4681 days 1%
auré bis 7/10 4956 days 1%
Puravida 10/10 5777 days 1%
Cymen Crick 10/10 5808 days 1%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Ambury Park Camping Ground does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

2.46% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

85%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.