Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Peel Forest Campground.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Peel Forest Campground
Valid Reviews
41 Valid Reviews
The Peel Forest Campground experience has a total of 41 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 41 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 18 |
|
44% |
| 9/10 | 15 |
|
37% |
| 8/10 | 6 |
|
15% |
| 7/10 | 2 |
|
5% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
91.95% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Peel Forest Campground valid reviews is 91.95% and is based on 41 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
9 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 41 valid reviews, the experience has 9 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 9 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 4 |
|
44% |
| 9/10 | 3 |
|
33% |
| 8/10 | 2 |
|
22% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
92.22% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Peel Forest Campground face-to-face reviews is 92.22% and is based on 9 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
94.25%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| lou | 9/10 | 230 days | 99% |
| Jamie Fligg | 10/10 | 230 days | 100% |
| Adrianna | 9/10 | 350 days | 95% |
| Ruth | 10/10 | 564 days | 84% |
| Levi Helwig | 9/10 | 595 days | 81% |
| VamperCan | 8/10 | 623 days | 79% |
| Ayla Maskey | 10/10 | 654 days | 78% |
| Moritz Schirmer | 10/10 | 685 days | 75% |
| Aaron | 9/10 | 746 days | 70% |
| Jasmine | 10/10 | 929 days | 52% |
| Sue | 10/10 | 960 days | 49% |
| Ricky | 10/10 | 1265 days | 23% |
| Basil | 9/10 | 1295 days | 21% |
| Amber | 10/10 | 1326 days | 20% |
| Merel | 10/10 | 1477 days | 12% |
| Juergen | 9/10 | 2481 days | 4% |
| Cat | 10/10 | 2512 days | 4% |
| Katherine Ong | 7/10 | 2603 days | 3% |
| Piezzo | 10/10 | 2907 days | 3% |
| Mike Fricker | 10/10 | 2938 days | 3% |
| Howard Morris | 7/10 | 3304 days | 2% |
| Nancy Grossman | 9/10 | 3499 days | 2% |
| sara hoeflaken | 9/10 | 3573 days | 1% |
| CMG | 9/10 | 3576 days | 1% |
| Eva Vilches | 9/10 | 3880 days | 1% |
| Jo Batt | 8/10 | 3977 days | 1% |
| Rossco | 9/10 | 4217 days | 0% |
| Robina Harris | 10/10 | 4276 days | 0% |
| Ruud Biemans | 10/10 | 4613 days | 1% |
| mcp hm | 9/10 | 4672 days | 1% |
| FlyingKiwiGirl | 10/10 | 4733 days | 1% |
| Henrik Joshua | 8/10 | 4764 days | 1% |
| AnnaM | 8/10 | 4947 days | 1% |
| Bill and Noreen | 9/10 | 5004 days | 1% |
| Cindy & Glen Kerunsky | 10/10 | 5359 days | 1% |
| David Emerick | 9/10 | 5712 days | 1% |
| Bob Kusesia | 10/10 | 6075 days | 1% |
| Simon Slawner | 9/10 | 6166 days | 1% |
| Stefanie E | 8/10 | 6171 days | 1% |
| Gina Swindells | 10/10 | 6175 days | 1% |
| Freda Pozell | 8/10 | 6187 days | 1% |
Adjustments
No Adjustment
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Peel Forest Campground does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
Balancing Adjustment
0.51% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
95%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.