Ranking Score Explained
Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Getaway Te Anau.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Getaway Te Anau
Valid Reviews
242 Valid Reviews
The Getaway Te Anau experience has a total of 245 reviews. There are 242 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 3 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 242 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 72 |
|
30% |
| 9/10 | 88 |
|
36% |
| 8/10 | 45 |
|
19% |
| 7/10 | 21 |
|
9% |
| 6/10 | 7 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
86.20% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Getaway Te Anau valid reviews is 86.20% and is based on 242 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
166 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 242 valid reviews, the experience has 166 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 166 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 49 |
|
30% |
| 9/10 | 61 |
|
37% |
| 8/10 | 36 |
|
22% |
| 7/10 | 13 |
|
8% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.41% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Getaway Te Anau face-to-face reviews is 87.41% and is based on 166 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
82.30%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Face-to-Face | Weight | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fiona | 8/10 | 85 days | 93.91 | 100% | |
| Robert Adler | 10/10 | 207 days | 93.21 | 99% | |
| Mike Dexter | 1/10 | 236 days | 66.56 | 71% | |
| Nviedma@hotmail.com | 10/10 | 359 days | 79.58 | 85% | |
| Andrew | 10/10 | 389 days | 76.02 | 81% | |
| Guru | 9/10 | 420 days | 72.05 | 77% | |
| Carolina | 10/10 | 420 days | 72.05 | 77% | |
| Rick Percival | 10/10 | 512 days | 58.46 | 62% | |
| Liz | 8/10 | 542 days | 50.78 | 54% | |
| Karl Ohm | 6/10 | 542 days | 44.36 | 47% | |
| Michael Armstrong | 1/10 | 542 days | 39.02 | 42% | |
| kim thomas | 10/10 | 573 days | 48.18 | 51% | |
| TP&MM | 9/10 | 573 days | 48.18 | 51% | |
| Brigitta | 7/10 | 601 days | 39.74 | 42% | |
| Michael S | 9/10 | 601 days | 43.67 | 47% | |
| Phil | 7/10 | 663 days | 31.46 | 34% | |
| Eveline & Ruben | 2/10 | 663 days | 25.93 | 28% | |
| Jordan & Jazlyn | 8/10 | 693 days | 29.08 | 31% | |
| Jolanda | 8/10 | 724 days | 25.47 | 27% | |
| Trevor Wiseman | 10/10 | 724 days | 26.81 | 29% | |
| Cynthia | 10/10 | 724 days | 26.81 | 29% | |
| Ruth Taaffee | 9/10 | 787 days | 20.03 | 21% | |
| Michael McMahon | 9/10 | 907 days | 10.6 | 11% | |
| Tati Moron | 10/10 | 911 days |  |
10.36 | 11% |
| Maureen Barlow | 9/10 | 938 days | 8.91 | 9% | |
| Mark Lindeman | 9/10 | 938 days | 8.91 | 9% | |
| Eversons | 9/10 | 966 days | 7.64 | 8% | |
| Mark Gorman | 10/10 | 993 days | 6.65 | 7% | |
| Katrina | 9/10 | 996 days | 6.55 | 7% | |
| Brigham Edgar | 10/10 | 1010 days | 6.14 | 7% | |
| Geoff Steele | 10/10 | 1118 days | 4.95 | 5% | |
| Duncan | 9/10 | 1226 days | 4.74 | 5% | |
| Grace White | 10/10 | 1259 days | 4.68 | 5% | |
| Susannah Arrowsmith | 9/10 | 1348 days | 4.5 | 5% | |
| Breanna Alexander | 8/10 | 1351 days | 4.27 | 5% | |
| Victoria Strong | 10/10 | 1360 days | 4.48 | 5% | |
| Jimmy Underhill | 8/10 | 1420 days | 4.15 | 4% | |
| Chris | 9/10 | 1453 days | 4.3 | 5% | |
| María del Carmen Escandell | 9/10 | 1600 days | 4.01 | 4% | |
| Betti | 10/10 | 1620 days | 3.97 | 4% | |
| Peter Barker | 3/10 | 1654 days | 3.01 | 3% | |
| S Black | 7/10 | 1667 days | 3.53 | 4% | |
| Stephan Friedrich | 10/10 | 1679 days | 3.86 | 4% | |
| Glinys Weller | 9/10 | 1714 days | 3.79 | 4% | |
| Antonio BENITEZ | 9/10 | 1728 days | 3.76 | 4% | |
| Paul Frost | 9/10 | 1800 days | 3.62 | 4% | |
| Yvonne Fogaryu | 10/10 | 1846 days | 3.53 | 4% | |
| Jessie Karsif | 9/10 | 1932 days | 3.36 | 4% | |
| Mike Gornall | 9/10 | 2033 days | 3.16 | 3% | |
| Manuela Opprecht | 10/10 | 2073 days | 3.09 | 3% | |
| Rene Bijma | 8/10 | 2083 days | 2.91 | 3% | |
| Leah Stewart | 10/10 | 2093 days | 3.05 | 3% | |
| Die Mehles | 7/10 | 2094 days | 2.77 | 3% | |
| Daniel Jarrett | 7/10 | 2184 days | 2.61 | 3% | |
| Eva-Maria Krueger | 7/10 | 2399 days | 2.23 | 2% | |
| Julia Seiffert | 9/10 | 2400 days | |
2.45 | 3% |
| Maya Bakker-deDreu | 7/10 | 2448 days | |
2.14 | 2% |
| Anne and Steve Bartlett | 8/10 | 2450 days | |
2.23 | 2% |
| Ted Cole | 8/10 | 2458 days | 2.22 | 2% | |
| Elly Zimmer | 9/10 | 2465 days | |
2.32 | 2% |
| GARRYBLOWER | 10/10 | 2489 days | 2.27 | 2% | |
| K. H. | 10/10 | 2489 days | 2.27 | 2% | |
| ozelmer | 6/10 | 2580 days | 1.74 | 2% | |
| Grantygrant | 9/10 | 2733 days | 1.79 | 2% | |
| Martijn Jansen | 9/10 | 2751 days | |
1.76 | 2% |
| battum 80 | 3/10 | 2764 days | 1.34 | 1% | |
| Philip Gibbons | 6/10 | 2792 days | 1.39 | 1% | |
| Michael Nolan | 9/10 | 2792 days | 1.68 | 2% | |
| Christopher Saunders | 9/10 | 2806 days | |
1.65 | 2% |
| Lis Bon | 7/10 | 2823 days | 1.47 | 2% | |
| John | 9/10 | 2847 days | |
1.57 | 2% |
| C Schaap | 9/10 | 2865 days | |
1.54 | 2% |
| roos wubben | 9/10 | 2870 days | |
1.53 | 2% |
| Kali Lohman | 9/10 | 2870 days | |
1.53 | 2% |
| Ton Franke | 8/10 | 2870 days | |
1.45 | 2% |
| Dagette | 9/10 | 2915 days | 1.44 | 2% | |
| Danielle Roberts | 9/10 | 2945 days | 1.38 | 1% | |
| Paul Kelly | 9/10 | 2945 days | 1.38 | 1% | |
| sueadegizmo | 9/10 | 3037 days | 1.2 | 1% | |
| MeganG | 9/10 | 3068 days | 1.14 | 1% | |
| HelenKate | 10/10 | 3068 days | 1.14 | 1% | |
| Stuart Arrol | 9/10 | 3094 days | |
1.09 | 1% |
| Robin Sable | 9/10 | 3110 days | |
1.06 | 1% |
| Oliver Hardt | 10/10 | 3118 days | |
1.04 | 1% |
| Carole Carter | 8/10 | 3121 days | |
0.98 | 1% |
| Matthias Angela | 8/10 | 3123 days | |
0.98 | 1% |
| Stephanie Spurr | 10/10 | 3125 days | |
1.03 | 1% |
| J Jmal | 10/10 | 3125 days | |
1.03 | 1% |
| Roy Barton | 8/10 | 3126 days | |
0.97 | 1% |
| nztintin | 10/10 | 3129 days | 1.02 | 1% | |
| Richard and Janet | 7/10 | 3132 days | |
0.92 | 1% |
| Elke Ingulf | 8/10 | 3138 days | |
0.95 | 1% |
| Fleming Lauridsen | 8/10 | 3138 days | |
0.95 | 1% |
| B Sluis | 9/10 | 3138 days | |
1.0 | 1% |
| Howell Davies | 9/10 | 3138 days | |
1.0 | 1% |
| Elaine | 10/10 | 3139 days | |
1.0 | 1% |
| Beeny | 9/10 | 3139 days | |
1.0 | 1% |
| Stam | 7/10 | 3140 days | |
0.91 | 1% |
| Mike & Mandy | 7/10 | 3140 days | |
0.91 | 1% |
| Paul & Sharon Sneller | 9/10 | 3142 days | |
0.99 | 1% |
| Seth & Carla | 7/10 | 3143 days | |
0.9 | 1% |
| Russell | 9/10 | 3143 days | |
0.99 | 1% |
| Houter | 9/10 | 3143 days | |
0.99 | 1% |
| David & Sue Lokkerbol | 9/10 | 3144 days | |
0.99 | 1% |
| Janse | 6/10 | 3145 days | |
0.82 | 1% |
| Devon Urlacher | 9/10 | 3152 days | |
0.97 | 1% |
| Marco Scheiber | 9/10 | 3152 days | |
0.97 | 1% |
| Des & Ann Bidwell | 10/10 | 3153 days | |
0.97 | 1% |
| Robert MacLeod-Smith | 8/10 | 3154 days | |
0.92 | 1% |
| Friedrich Kaltner | 10/10 | 3154 days | |
0.97 | 1% |
| Gerhard | 9/10 | 3156 days | |
0.97 | 1% |
| Thyg Lingdal | 10/10 | 3157 days | |
0.96 | 1% |
| Nicole van Bergen | 9/10 | 3157 days | |
0.96 | 1% |
| Urban Reifler | 10/10 | 3169 days | |
0.94 | 1% |
| Colin Jenkins | 8/10 | 3169 days | |
0.89 | 1% |
| Mike & April Prince | 9/10 | 3171 days | |
0.94 | 1% |
| deJong | 10/10 | 3224 days | |
0.83 | 1% |
| Frank & Margot Best | 9/10 | 3447 days | |
0.4 | 0% |
| Fontvieille | 8/10 | 3447 days | |
0.38 | 0% |
| Peter Kuschnir | 10/10 | 3467 days | |
0.36 | 0% |
| Gordon Agent | 10/10 | 3472 days | |
0.35 | 0% |
| Stefan Schmitz | 9/10 | 3477 days | |
0.34 | 0% |
| Stuart Beagley | 9/10 | 3477 days | |
0.34 | 0% |
| Nick Foster | 10/10 | 3477 days | |
0.34 | 0% |
| Kevin Wong | 10/10 | 3477 days | |
0.34 | 0% |
| Michael | 10/10 | 3478 days | |
0.34 | 0% |
| Gema | 8/10 | 3478 days | |
0.32 | 0% |
| Gronewold Harm-Dierchs | 9/10 | 3479 days | |
0.33 | 0% |
| Berger | 10/10 | 3479 days | |
0.33 | 0% |
| Werner and Rita | 9/10 | 3479 days | |
0.33 | 0% |
| Mark Vass | 7/10 | 3480 days | |
0.3 | 0% |
| Robin Smith | 10/10 | 3481 days | |
0.33 | 0% |
| Ven | 9/10 | 3481 days | |
0.33 | 0% |
| Guult Ryan | 9/10 | 3481 days | |
0.33 | 0% |
| John Duffy | 10/10 | 3481 days | |
0.33 | 0% |
| Robin Adair | 8/10 | 3482 days | |
0.31 | 0% |
| Juliane Kleiu | 10/10 | 3485 days | |
0.32 | 0% |
| Bill Cutler | 9/10 | 3485 days | |
0.32 | 0% |
| Max | 10/10 | 3486 days | |
0.32 | 0% |
| Linda Kremer | 10/10 | 3486 days | |
0.32 | 0% |
| Barbara Link | 10/10 | 3486 days | |
0.32 | 0% |
| Andy Johnson | 10/10 | 3486 days | |
0.32 | 0% |
| Tim Laurent | 4/10 | 3486 days | |
0.25 | 0% |
| Rebecca Johnston | 10/10 | 3486 days | |
0.32 | 0% |
| Ben Akin-Smith | 9/10 | 3489 days | |
0.32 | 0% |
| Lynda Hutchins | 10/10 | 3489 days | |
0.32 | 0% |
| Katherine Forward | 8/10 | 3489 days | |
0.3 | 0% |
| Sandra Schulz | 9/10 | 3489 days | |
0.32 | 0% |
| Tinnermans | 8/10 | 3489 days | |
0.3 | 0% |
| E C Frans | 6/10 | 3493 days | |
0.26 | 0% |
| Jim Coffin | 9/10 | 3493 days | |
0.31 | 0% |
| Raith | 9/10 | 3494 days | |
0.31 | 0% |
| Derek McLoughlin | 9/10 | 3502 days | |
0.29 | 0% |
| Josef & Christine Evers | 9/10 | 3504 days | |
0.29 | 0% |
| Manfred & Gabi | 9/10 | 3506 days | |
0.28 | 0% |
| Bob Adams | 10/10 | 3507 days | |
0.28 | 0% |
| Frank Lehe | 9/10 | 3508 days | |
0.28 | 0% |
| Dana Pagliarini | 7/10 | 3511 days | |
0.25 | 0% |
| Roger Lows | 8/10 | 3514 days | |
0.25 | 0% |
| Samuel Prechel | 3/10 | 3515 days | |
0.2 | 0% |
| Dave and Lin Mungham | 7/10 | 3516 days | |
0.24 | 0% |
| Kardiue & Friederike Florian | 9/10 | 3517 days | |
0.26 | 0% |
| Remco Smit | 10/10 | 3519 days | |
0.26 | 0% |
| Andreas Neo | 6/10 | 3520 days | |
0.21 | 0% |
| Jochen | 9/10 | 3521 days | |
0.25 | 0% |
| hendrik king | 7/10 | 3554 days | 0.17 | 0% | |
| dollimyxture | 9/10 | 3585 days | 0.13 | 0% | |
| Montys | 10/10 | 3646 days | 0.01 | 0% | |
| Andrew Hammond | 8/10 | 3646 days | 0.01 | 0% | |
| Wegmann Regula | 9/10 | 3773 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Dud Grossmann | 8/10 | 3777 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Anna | 8/10 | 3778 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Lomas | 10/10 | 3790 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Linda & Fred | 9/10 | 3792 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| lindam | 10/10 | 3829 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Don & Geraldine | 9/10 | 3835 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Marg | 8/10 | 3835 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Hans and Astrid | 8/10 | 3837 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Risch & Seybold | 8/10 | 3842 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Russ Turner | 10/10 | 3846 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Polil | 8/10 | 3846 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Keita-Karen Buchanan | 9/10 | 3846 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| markus Brandenberger | 9/10 | 3847 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Margie Sammons | 10/10 | 3848 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Hilary and Chris Ayton | 10/10 | 3848 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Gerald Veldink | 9/10 | 3848 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| P.C Kool | 9/10 | 3855 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Rod C | 7/10 | 3858 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Kaddi & Grego | 3/10 | 3861 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Giaque | 5/10 | 3866 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Sheila Morgan | 10/10 | 3869 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Jann Clar | 7/10 | 3869 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Wilbert Germ | 10/10 | 3873 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Christian | 10/10 | 3880 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Lewis | 9/10 | 3881 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Annie | 8/10 | 3882 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Dick Rosman | 8/10 | 3884 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Nadine Schaee | 8/10 | 3885 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Terry Phillips | 8/10 | 3885 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| John Winter | 8/10 | 3885 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Ingrid Overes | 8/10 | 3887 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| grobster | 6/10 | 3888 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| Kevin and Teresa | 8/10 | 3888 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Jessica | 8/10 | 3893 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Ruud Kapteyn | 8/10 | 3894 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Sibille Fischer | 8/10 | 3901 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| E.M. Prideaux | 10/10 | 3902 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Jennifer Templeton | 7/10 | 3905 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Stevens Frans | 7/10 | 3905 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Thomas Stopp | 10/10 | 3919 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| marcusba | 9/10 | 3931 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| marijad | 10/10 | 3938 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| martint | 10/10 | 3943 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| carsteng | 9/10 | 3944 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Mark Jenkins | 10/10 | 3958 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Alan Riley | 8/10 | 3962 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Ann Riley | 10/10 | 3962 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Marcel Schleinkcfer | 9/10 | 3962 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Primavesi | 8/10 | 3962 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Thorben Thede | 9/10 | 3962 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| X Neils | 9/10 | 3972 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| andyge | 9/10 | 3980 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Cheryl | 9/10 | 3980 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| bondd | 10/10 | 4059 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| harryb | 10/10 | 4059 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| kindel | 9/10 | 4076 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Donna | 10/10 | 4105 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| John | 10/10 | 4164 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| PamB | 9/10 | 4182 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| marianneb | 8/10 | 4194 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Silvia Huerlimann | 10/10 | 4194 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| SonjaG | 9/10 | 4211 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| JaninaF | 10/10 | 4212 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Loethke | 9/10 | 4212 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Peter Bowen-Simpkins | 7/10 | 4214 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| GrahamM1 | 9/10 | 4227 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| JetteG | 8/10 | 4228 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| VolkerS | 9/10 | 4228 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| AdelineC | 8/10 | 4229 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Richard | 10/10 | 4235 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Terry | 9/10 | 4241 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| john west | 10/10 | 4262 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Getaway Te Anau experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-1.18% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 71 days. However the Getaway Te Anau experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Getaway Te Anau experience has been adjusted for 75 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 72 | -1.13% |
| 73 | -1.15% |
| 74 | -1.16% |
| 75 | -1.18% |
| 76 | -1.19% |
| 77 | -1.21% |
| 78 | -1.22% |
| … | … |
Final Ranking Score
81%
The final ranking score once adjustments and rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.