Ranking Score Explained
Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Getaway Te Anau.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Getaway Te Anau
Valid Reviews
241 Valid Reviews
The Getaway Te Anau experience has a total of 244 reviews. There are 241 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 3 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 241 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 72 |
|
30% |
| 9/10 | 88 |
|
37% |
| 8/10 | 44 |
|
18% |
| 7/10 | 21 |
|
9% |
| 6/10 | 7 |
|
3% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 4 |
|
2% |
| 2/10 | 1 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
86.22% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Getaway Te Anau valid reviews is 86.22% and is based on 241 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
166 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 241 valid reviews, the experience has 166 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 166 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 49 |
|
30% |
| 9/10 | 61 |
|
37% |
| 8/10 | 36 |
|
22% |
| 7/10 | 13 |
|
8% |
| 6/10 | 3 |
|
2% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
| 3/10 | 2 |
|
1% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
87.41% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Getaway Te Anau face-to-face reviews is 87.41% and is based on 166 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
82.53%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Face-to-Face | Weight | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robert Adler | 10/10 | 124 days | 97.56 | 100% | |
| Mike Dexter | 1/10 | 153 days | 70.29 | 72% | |
| Nviedma@hotmail.com | 10/10 | 276 days | 87.93 | 90% | |
| Andrew | 10/10 | 306 days | 85.16 | 87% | |
| Guru | 9/10 | 337 days | 82.0 | 84% | |
| Carolina | 10/10 | 337 days | 82.0 | 84% | |
| Rick Percival | 10/10 | 429 days | 70.84 | 73% | |
| Liz | 8/10 | 459 days | 63.28 | 65% | |
| Karl Ohm | 6/10 | 459 days | 55.29 | 57% | |
| Michael Armstrong | 1/10 | 459 days | 48.63 | 50% | |
| kim thomas | 10/10 | 490 days | 61.95 | 64% | |
| TP&MM | 9/10 | 490 days | 61.95 | 64% | |
| Brigitta | 7/10 | 518 days | 52.31 | 54% | |
| Michael S | 9/10 | 518 days | 57.48 | 59% | |
| Phil | 7/10 | 580 days | 42.8 | 44% | |
| Eveline & Ruben | 2/10 | 580 days | 35.27 | 36% | |
| Jordan & Jazlyn | 8/10 | 610 days | 40.16 | 41% | |
| Jolanda | 8/10 | 641 days | 35.78 | 37% | |
| Trevor Wiseman | 10/10 | 641 days | 37.66 | 39% | |
| Cynthia | 10/10 | 641 days | 37.66 | 39% | |
| Ruth Taaffee | 9/10 | 704 days | 29.23 | 30% | |
| Michael McMahon | 9/10 | 824 days | 16.64 | 17% | |
| Tati Moron | 10/10 | 828 days |  |
16.3 | 17% |
| Maureen Barlow | 9/10 | 855 days | 14.13 | 14% | |
| Mark Lindeman | 9/10 | 855 days | 14.13 | 14% | |
| Eversons | 9/10 | 883 days | 12.12 | 12% | |
| Mark Gorman | 10/10 | 910 days | 10.42 | 11% | |
| Katrina | 9/10 | 913 days | 10.25 | 11% | |
| Brigham Edgar | 10/10 | 927 days | 9.47 | 10% | |
| Geoff Steele | 10/10 | 1035 days | 5.57 | 6% | |
| Duncan | 9/10 | 1143 days | 4.91 | 5% | |
| Grace White | 10/10 | 1176 days | 4.84 | 5% | |
| Susannah Arrowsmith | 9/10 | 1265 days | 4.67 | 5% | |
| Breanna Alexander | 8/10 | 1268 days | 4.43 | 5% | |
| Victoria Strong | 10/10 | 1277 days | 4.64 | 5% | |
| Jimmy Underhill | 8/10 | 1337 days | 4.3 | 4% | |
| Chris | 9/10 | 1370 days | 4.46 | 5% | |
| María del Carmen Escandell | 9/10 | 1517 days | 4.17 | 4% | |
| Betti | 10/10 | 1537 days | 4.14 | 4% | |
| Peter Barker | 3/10 | 1571 days | 3.13 | 3% | |
| S Black | 7/10 | 1584 days | 3.68 | 4% | |
| Stephan Friedrich | 10/10 | 1596 days | 4.02 | 4% | |
| Glinys Weller | 9/10 | 1631 days | 3.95 | 4% | |
| Antonio BENITEZ | 9/10 | 1645 days | 3.92 | 4% | |
| Paul Frost | 9/10 | 1717 days | 3.78 | 4% | |
| Yvonne Fogaryu | 10/10 | 1763 days | 3.69 | 4% | |
| Jessie Karsif | 9/10 | 1849 days | 3.52 | 4% | |
| Mike Gornall | 9/10 | 1950 days | 3.33 | 3% | |
| Manuela Opprecht | 10/10 | 1990 days | 3.25 | 3% | |
| Rene Bijma | 8/10 | 2000 days | 3.07 | 3% | |
| Leah Stewart | 10/10 | 2010 days | 3.21 | 3% | |
| Die Mehles | 7/10 | 2011 days | 2.92 | 3% | |
| Daniel Jarrett | 7/10 | 2101 days | 2.76 | 3% | |
| Eva-Maria Krueger | 7/10 | 2316 days | 2.38 | 2% | |
| Julia Seiffert | 9/10 | 2317 days | |
2.61 | 3% |
| Maya Bakker-deDreu | 7/10 | 2365 days | |
2.29 | 2% |
| Anne and Steve Bartlett | 8/10 | 2367 days | |
2.39 | 2% |
| Ted Cole | 8/10 | 2375 days | 2.37 | 2% | |
| Elly Zimmer | 9/10 | 2382 days | |
2.48 | 3% |
| GARRYBLOWER | 10/10 | 2406 days | 2.43 | 2% | |
| K. H. | 10/10 | 2406 days | 2.43 | 2% | |
| ozelmer | 6/10 | 2497 days | 1.87 | 2% | |
| Grantygrant | 9/10 | 2650 days | 1.96 | 2% | |
| Martijn Jansen | 9/10 | 2668 days | |
1.92 | 2% |
| battum 80 | 3/10 | 2681 days | 1.46 | 1% | |
| Philip Gibbons | 6/10 | 2709 days | 1.53 | 2% | |
| Michael Nolan | 9/10 | 2709 days | 1.84 | 2% | |
| Christopher Saunders | 9/10 | 2723 days | |
1.81 | 2% |
| Lis Bon | 7/10 | 2740 days | 1.62 | 2% | |
| John | 9/10 | 2764 days | |
1.73 | 2% |
| C Schaap | 9/10 | 2782 days | |
1.7 | 2% |
| roos wubben | 9/10 | 2787 days | |
1.69 | 2% |
| Kali Lohman | 9/10 | 2787 days | |
1.69 | 2% |
| Ton Franke | 8/10 | 2787 days | |
1.6 | 2% |
| Dagette | 9/10 | 2832 days | 1.6 | 2% | |
| Danielle Roberts | 9/10 | 2862 days | 1.54 | 2% | |
| Paul Kelly | 9/10 | 2862 days | 1.54 | 2% | |
| sueadegizmo | 9/10 | 2954 days | 1.36 | 1% | |
| MeganG | 9/10 | 2985 days | 1.3 | 1% | |
| HelenKate | 10/10 | 2985 days | 1.3 | 1% | |
| Stuart Arrol | 9/10 | 3011 days | |
1.25 | 1% |
| Robin Sable | 9/10 | 3027 days | |
1.22 | 1% |
| Oliver Hardt | 10/10 | 3035 days | |
1.2 | 1% |
| Carole Carter | 8/10 | 3038 days | |
1.14 | 1% |
| Matthias Angela | 8/10 | 3040 days | |
1.13 | 1% |
| Stephanie Spurr | 10/10 | 3042 days | |
1.19 | 1% |
| J Jmal | 10/10 | 3042 days | |
1.19 | 1% |
| Roy Barton | 8/10 | 3043 days | |
1.13 | 1% |
| nztintin | 10/10 | 3046 days | 1.18 | 1% | |
| Richard and Janet | 7/10 | 3049 days | |
1.07 | 1% |
| Elke Ingulf | 8/10 | 3055 days | |
1.11 | 1% |
| Fleming Lauridsen | 8/10 | 3055 days | |
1.11 | 1% |
| B Sluis | 9/10 | 3055 days | |
1.16 | 1% |
| Howell Davies | 9/10 | 3055 days | |
1.16 | 1% |
| Elaine | 10/10 | 3056 days | |
1.16 | 1% |
| Beeny | 9/10 | 3056 days | |
1.16 | 1% |
| Stam | 7/10 | 3057 days | |
1.06 | 1% |
| Mike & Mandy | 7/10 | 3057 days | |
1.06 | 1% |
| Paul & Sharon Sneller | 9/10 | 3059 days | |
1.16 | 1% |
| Seth & Carla | 7/10 | 3060 days | |
1.05 | 1% |
| Russell | 9/10 | 3060 days | |
1.15 | 1% |
| Houter | 9/10 | 3060 days | |
1.15 | 1% |
| David & Sue Lokkerbol | 9/10 | 3061 days | |
1.15 | 1% |
| Janse | 6/10 | 3062 days | |
0.96 | 1% |
| Devon Urlacher | 9/10 | 3069 days | |
1.14 | 1% |
| Marco Scheiber | 9/10 | 3069 days | |
1.14 | 1% |
| Des & Ann Bidwell | 10/10 | 3070 days | |
1.14 | 1% |
| Robert MacLeod-Smith | 8/10 | 3071 days | |
1.08 | 1% |
| Friedrich Kaltner | 10/10 | 3071 days | |
1.13 | 1% |
| Gerhard | 9/10 | 3073 days | |
1.13 | 1% |
| Thyg Lingdal | 10/10 | 3074 days | |
1.13 | 1% |
| Nicole van Bergen | 9/10 | 3074 days | |
1.13 | 1% |
| Urban Reifler | 10/10 | 3086 days | |
1.1 | 1% |
| Colin Jenkins | 8/10 | 3086 days | |
1.05 | 1% |
| Mike & April Prince | 9/10 | 3088 days | |
1.1 | 1% |
| deJong | 10/10 | 3141 days | |
1.0 | 1% |
| Frank & Margot Best | 9/10 | 3364 days | |
0.56 | 1% |
| Fontvieille | 8/10 | 3364 days | |
0.53 | 1% |
| Peter Kuschnir | 10/10 | 3384 days | |
0.52 | 1% |
| Gordon Agent | 10/10 | 3389 days | |
0.51 | 1% |
| Stefan Schmitz | 9/10 | 3394 days | |
0.5 | 1% |
| Stuart Beagley | 9/10 | 3394 days | |
0.5 | 1% |
| Nick Foster | 10/10 | 3394 days | |
0.5 | 1% |
| Kevin Wong | 10/10 | 3394 days | |
0.5 | 1% |
| Michael | 10/10 | 3395 days | |
0.5 | 1% |
| Gema | 8/10 | 3395 days | |
0.47 | 0% |
| Gronewold Harm-Dierchs | 9/10 | 3396 days | |
0.5 | 1% |
| Berger | 10/10 | 3396 days | |
0.5 | 1% |
| Werner and Rita | 9/10 | 3396 days | |
0.5 | 1% |
| Mark Vass | 7/10 | 3397 days | |
0.45 | 0% |
| Robin Smith | 10/10 | 3398 days | |
0.49 | 1% |
| Ven | 9/10 | 3398 days | |
0.49 | 1% |
| Guult Ryan | 9/10 | 3398 days | |
0.49 | 1% |
| John Duffy | 10/10 | 3398 days | |
0.49 | 1% |
| Robin Adair | 8/10 | 3399 days | |
0.47 | 0% |
| Juliane Kleiu | 10/10 | 3402 days | |
0.49 | 0% |
| Bill Cutler | 9/10 | 3402 days | |
0.49 | 0% |
| Max | 10/10 | 3403 days | |
0.48 | 0% |
| Linda Kremer | 10/10 | 3403 days | |
0.48 | 0% |
| Barbara Link | 10/10 | 3403 days | |
0.48 | 0% |
| Andy Johnson | 10/10 | 3403 days | |
0.48 | 0% |
| Tim Laurent | 4/10 | 3403 days | |
0.38 | 0% |
| Rebecca Johnston | 10/10 | 3403 days | |
0.48 | 0% |
| Ben Akin-Smith | 9/10 | 3406 days | |
0.48 | 0% |
| Lynda Hutchins | 10/10 | 3406 days | |
0.48 | 0% |
| Katherine Forward | 8/10 | 3406 days | |
0.45 | 0% |
| Sandra Schulz | 9/10 | 3406 days | |
0.48 | 0% |
| Tinnermans | 8/10 | 3406 days | |
0.45 | 0% |
| E C Frans | 6/10 | 3410 days | |
0.39 | 0% |
| Jim Coffin | 9/10 | 3410 days | |
0.47 | 0% |
| Raith | 9/10 | 3411 days | |
0.47 | 0% |
| Derek McLoughlin | 9/10 | 3419 days | |
0.45 | 0% |
| Josef & Christine Evers | 9/10 | 3421 days | |
0.45 | 0% |
| Manfred & Gabi | 9/10 | 3423 days | |
0.44 | 0% |
| Bob Adams | 10/10 | 3424 days | |
0.44 | 0% |
| Frank Lehe | 9/10 | 3425 days | |
0.44 | 0% |
| Dana Pagliarini | 7/10 | 3428 days | |
0.4 | 0% |
| Roger Lows | 8/10 | 3431 days | |
0.41 | 0% |
| Samuel Prechel | 3/10 | 3432 days | |
0.33 | 0% |
| Dave and Lin Mungham | 7/10 | 3433 days | |
0.39 | 0% |
| Kardiue & Friederike Florian | 9/10 | 3434 days | |
0.42 | 0% |
| Remco Smit | 10/10 | 3436 days | |
0.42 | 0% |
| Andreas Neo | 6/10 | 3437 days | |
0.35 | 0% |
| Jochen | 9/10 | 3438 days | |
0.41 | 0% |
| hendrik king | 7/10 | 3471 days | 0.32 | 0% | |
| dollimyxture | 9/10 | 3502 days | 0.29 | 0% | |
| Montys | 10/10 | 3563 days | 0.17 | 0% | |
| Andrew Hammond | 8/10 | 3563 days | 0.16 | 0% | |
| Wegmann Regula | 9/10 | 3690 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Dud Grossmann | 8/10 | 3694 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Anna | 8/10 | 3695 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Lomas | 10/10 | 3707 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Linda & Fred | 9/10 | 3709 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| lindam | 10/10 | 3746 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Don & Geraldine | 9/10 | 3752 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Marg | 8/10 | 3752 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Hans and Astrid | 8/10 | 3754 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Risch & Seybold | 8/10 | 3759 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Russ Turner | 10/10 | 3763 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Polil | 8/10 | 3763 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Keita-Karen Buchanan | 9/10 | 3763 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| markus Brandenberger | 9/10 | 3764 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Margie Sammons | 10/10 | 3765 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Hilary and Chris Ayton | 10/10 | 3765 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Gerald Veldink | 9/10 | 3765 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| P.C Kool | 9/10 | 3772 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Rod C | 7/10 | 3775 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Kaddi & Grego | 3/10 | 3778 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Giaque | 5/10 | 3783 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Sheila Morgan | 10/10 | 3786 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Jann Clar | 7/10 | 3786 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Wilbert Germ | 10/10 | 3790 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Christian | 10/10 | 3797 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Lewis | 9/10 | 3798 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Annie | 8/10 | 3799 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Dick Rosman | 8/10 | 3801 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Nadine Schaee | 8/10 | 3802 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Terry Phillips | 8/10 | 3802 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| John Winter | 8/10 | 3802 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Ingrid Overes | 8/10 | 3804 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| grobster | 6/10 | 3805 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| Kevin and Teresa | 8/10 | 3805 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Jessica | 8/10 | 3810 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Ruud Kapteyn | 8/10 | 3811 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Sibille Fischer | 8/10 | 3818 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| E.M. Prideaux | 10/10 | 3819 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Jennifer Templeton | 7/10 | 3822 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Stevens Frans | 7/10 | 3822 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Thomas Stopp | 10/10 | 3836 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| marcusba | 9/10 | 3848 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| marijad | 10/10 | 3855 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| martint | 10/10 | 3860 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| carsteng | 9/10 | 3861 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Mark Jenkins | 10/10 | 3875 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Alan Riley | 8/10 | 3879 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Ann Riley | 10/10 | 3879 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Marcel Schleinkcfer | 9/10 | 3879 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Primavesi | 8/10 | 3879 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Thorben Thede | 9/10 | 3879 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| X Neils | 9/10 | 3889 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| andyge | 9/10 | 3897 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Cheryl | 9/10 | 3897 days | 0.0 | 0% | |
| bondd | 10/10 | 3976 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| harryb | 10/10 | 3976 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| kindel | 9/10 | 3993 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Donna | 10/10 | 4022 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| John | 10/10 | 4081 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| PamB | 9/10 | 4099 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| marianneb | 8/10 | 4111 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Silvia Huerlimann | 10/10 | 4111 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| SonjaG | 9/10 | 4128 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| JaninaF | 10/10 | 4129 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Loethke | 9/10 | 4129 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Peter Bowen-Simpkins | 7/10 | 4131 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| GrahamM1 | 9/10 | 4144 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| JetteG | 8/10 | 4145 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| VolkerS | 9/10 | 4145 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| AdelineC | 8/10 | 4146 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Richard | 10/10 | 4152 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| Terry | 9/10 | 4158 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
| john west | 10/10 | 4179 days | |
0.0 | 0% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Getaway Te Anau experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-1.06% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 123 days. However the Getaway Te Anau experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Getaway Te Anau experience has been adjusted for 105 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 102 | -1.03% |
| 103 | -1.04% |
| 104 | -1.05% |
| 105 | -1.06% |
| 106 | -1.07% |
| 107 | -1.08% |
| 108 | -1.09% |
| … | … |
Final Ranking Score
81%
The final ranking score once adjustments and rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.