Ranking Score Explained

Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Cheviot Motels and Holiday Park.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Nick Morrison's avatar

Nick Morrison

Rankers owner

Cheviot Motels and Holiday Park

Valid Reviews

26 Valid Reviews

The Cheviot Motels and Holiday Park experience has a total of 26 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Within these 26 valid reviews, the experience has 2 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 26 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 21
9/10 4
8/10 0
7/10 0
6/10 1
5/10 0
4/10 0
3/10 0
2/10 0
1/10 0

96.92% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Cheviot Motels and Holiday Park valid reviews is 96.92% and is based on 26 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Weighted Average


Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Face-to-Face Weight Relative Weight
Teb 9/10 171 days 95.37 100%
Alison 10/10 262 days 89.12 93%
Matthew Dercole 6/10 265 days 88.87 93%
Peter Edmead 10/10 293 days 86.4 90%
Chris 10/10 293 days 86.4 90%
annette monaghan 9/10 293 days 86.4 90%
Claus 10/10 321 days 83.67 87%
Peter Rafferty 10/10 327 days 83.06 86%
Anika Bedard 10/10 347 days 80.92 84%
Christelle Linaud 10/10 361 days 79.35 82%
Lilith Prins 10/10 363 days 79.12 82%
Caroline Haupt 10/10 418 days 72.31 75%
Joy Porritt 10/10 420 days 72.05 74%
Stuart Jeffrey 10/10 668 days true 40.67 40%
Ursula Schoenenberger 10/10 734 days 25.65 23%
Rogier Post 10/10 776 days 21.13 18%
Beth Goodrich 9/10 882 days 12.19 9%
Cullen Wiginton 10/10 943 days 8.66 5%
Dennis Schwarz 10/10 975 days 7.28 3%
Maximilian Eck 10/10 976 days 7.24 3%
Arthur Mudde 10/10 979 days 7.13 3%
Kelly Hitchins 10/10 995 days 6.58 2%
Julia Mayerhoefer 10/10 1026 days 5.75 1%
Martin Hofmann 10/10 1294 days 4.73 0%
Sina Leidig 10/10 1508 days 4.43 0%
Flo Sexton 9/10 1812 days true 4.82 0%


Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Cheviot Motels and Holiday Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-3.16% Adjustment

There may be an adjustment if an experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 60 days. However the Cheviot Motels and Holiday Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 364 days.

The Cheviot Motels and Holiday Park experience has been adjusted for 158 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
155 -3.10%
156 -3.12%
157 -3.14%
158 -3.16%
159 -3.18%
160 -3.20%
161 -3.22%

Final Ranking Score


The final ranking score once adjustments and rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.