G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Dannevirke Holiday Park.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Dannevirke Holiday Park

Valid Reviews

39 Valid Reviews

The Dannevirke Holiday Park experience has a total of 40 reviews. There are 39 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Within these 39 valid reviews, the experience has 2 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 39 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 24
62%
9/10 9
23%
8/10 3
8%
7/10 2
5%
6/10 1
3%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

93.59% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Dannevirke Holiday Park valid reviews is 93.59% and is based on 39 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Weighted Average

91.96%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Gus 10/10 119 days 100%
Troy B 9/10 484 days 86%
Bevjean 8/10 607 days 78%
Jonathan Bedford 9/10 973 days 46%
Amy Shoemake 10/10 1277 days 22%
SF 10/10 1277 days 22%
Corina Buhl 7/10 1307 days 19%
Gill Sharpe 10/10 1307 days 20%
BerryD 10/10 1368 days 16%
Chelsea Mackmurdie 10/10 1917 days 4%
Ferg 10/10 2068 days 4%
Pat 10/10 2098 days 4%
Michaela 9/10 2311 days 3%
W Sanders 7/10 2617 days 3%
C J B 9/10 2921 days 2%
Lene Hendel 8/10 3058 days 2%
Phil and Mel Rowson 10/10 3132 days 2%
Anke Vehmeiers 10/10 3235 days 2%
Dalton Howden 9/10 3263 days 2%
Beverley Halfhide 9/10 3335 days 1%
Kristina Russo 10/10 3354 days 1%
Denise Hall 10/10 3360 days 1%
Yves Aeschbacher 10/10 3422 days 1%
Maria Williams 10/10 3494 days 1%
Herma Betten 9/10 3503 days 1%
Bernadette Figueroa 10/10 3550 days 1%
Mike Pierre 10/10 3582 days 1%
Bernhard Schupp 10/10 3751 days 1%
Phillippa McLernon 10/10 3756 days 1%
Leanne Carr 10/10 3757 days 1%
Amy Zhang 10/10 3780 days 1%
hendrik king 10/10 3864 days 0%
Bob Allen 9/10 3893 days 0%
Aviad Bitran 10/10 3965 days 0%
Megan Berry 8/10 4025 days 0%
Julia Terveen 10/10 4039 days 0%
Larry Shute 9/10 4564 days 0%
Diane Johnston 6/10 5563 days 0%
Lynn Maguire 10/10 6011 days 0%

Adjustments

Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Dannevirke Holiday Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-1.40% Adjustment

There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 105 days. However the Dannevirke Holiday Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.

The Dannevirke Holiday Park experience has been adjusted for 113 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
110 -1.36%
111 -1.37%
112 -1.38%
113 -1.40%
114 -1.41%
115 -1.42%
116 -1.43%

Balancing Adjustment

0.92% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

92%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.