Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for All Seasons Holiday Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
44 Valid Reviews
The All Seasons Holiday Park experience has a total of 48 reviews. There are 44 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 4 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 44 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 25 |
|
57% |
9/10 | 9 |
|
20% |
8/10 | 7 |
|
16% |
7/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
6/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
5/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
92.05% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the All Seasons Holiday Park valid reviews is 92.05% and is based on 44 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
82.89%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Mike | 5/10 | 105 days | 80% |
Ashley Rainbird | 9/10 | 258 days | 100% |
Christy | 8/10 | 624 days | 80% |
Felicity Nicolson | 8/10 | 654 days | 78% |
Szilveszter | 10/10 | 685 days | 77% |
Todd Caldwell | 6/10 | 744 days | 62% |
Laura Jarry | 8/10 | 775 days | 68% |
Mar | 8/10 | 775 days | 68% |
Gil Gurney | 10/10 | 1019 days | 44% |
Ian and Judi | 10/10 | 1140 days | 33% |
Dons | 10/10 | 1384 days | 17% |
Toni | 10/10 | 1384 days | 17% |
P, H & H | 8/10 | 1474 days | 12% |
Verona | 10/10 | 1596 days | 8% |
Josh | 10/10 | 1658 days | 7% |
James Murphy | 10/10 | 1840 days | 5% |
Grumpster | 10/10 | 1993 days | 5% |
jofa972 | 9/10 | 2480 days | 4% |
The swissies | 7/10 | 2539 days | 3% |
Kimberley Timberlake | 9/10 | 2603 days | 4% |
Tour Nz | 10/10 | 2692 days | 3% |
Brooke Cooper | 10/10 | 2725 days | 3% |
Mary Irvine | 10/10 | 2919 days | 3% |
Rima | 10/10 | 2996 days | 3% |
Barbara Blair | 9/10 | 3004 days | 3% |
Jane Knowles | 10/10 | 3027 days | 3% |
Elizabeth Braidotti | 10/10 | 3063 days | 3% |
Lyn Pobke | 8/10 | 3180 days | 2% |
Aaron wood | 10/10 | 3260 days | 2% |
Jiri Lakosil | 10/10 | 3321 days | 2% |
María del Carmen Escandell | 10/10 | 3431 days | 2% |
Elles Janssen | 8/10 | 3697 days | 1% |
Daniel Capener | 9/10 | 3850 days | 1% |
Steven and Nikki De Vries | 9/10 | 3941 days | 1% |
Malcolm & Susan | 9/10 | 3972 days | 1% |
Mere Henry | 10/10 | 4153 days | 0% |
Buzzcook | 10/10 | 4276 days | 0% |
Sylvia Buckley | 10/10 | 4365 days | 0% |
David Restell | 9/10 | 4365 days | 0% |
Brittney Caird | 10/10 | 4396 days | 1% |
Skye Adlam | 10/10 | 4396 days | 1% |
FantasticNZ | 9/10 | 4610 days | 1% |
krlekta | 10/10 | 4946 days | 1% |
thornberrys | 10/10 | 5158 days | 1% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The All Seasons Holiday Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-1.57% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 45 days. However the All Seasons Holiday Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The All Seasons Holiday Park experience has been adjusted for 77 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
74 | -1.51% |
75 | -1.53% |
76 | -1.55% |
77 | -1.57% |
78 | -1.59% |
79 | -1.61% |
80 | -1.63% |
… | … |
2.64% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
84%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.