Ranking Score Explained

Hi, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for All Seasons Holiday Park.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

All Seasons Holiday Park

Valid Reviews

47 Valid Reviews

The All Seasons Holiday Park experience has a total of 51 reviews. There are 47 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 4 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 47 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 26
55%
9/10 9
19%
8/10 8
17%
7/10 1
2%
6/10 2
4%
5/10 1
2%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

91.28% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the All Seasons Holiday Park valid reviews is 91.28% and is based on 47 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Weighted Average

81.17%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Clement 8/10 73 days 98%
Trevor Hobson-Frohock 10/10 73 days 100%
Carmen 6/10 285 days 82%
Mike 5/10 589 days 61%
Ashley Rainbird 9/10 742 days 68%
Christy 8/10 1108 days 34%
Felicity Nicolson 8/10 1138 days 31%
Szilveszter 10/10 1169 days 30%
Todd Caldwell 6/10 1228 days 22%
Laura Jarry 8/10 1259 days 23%
Mar 8/10 1259 days 23%
Gil Gurney 10/10 1503 days 11%
Ian and Judi 10/10 1624 days 7%
Dons 10/10 1868 days 5%
Toni 10/10 1868 days 5%
P, H & H 8/10 1958 days 5%
Verona 10/10 2080 days 4%
Josh 10/10 2142 days 4%
James Murphy 10/10 2324 days 4%
Grumpster 10/10 2477 days 4%
jofa972 9/10 2964 days 3%
The swissies 7/10 3023 days 2%
Kimberley Timberlake 9/10 3087 days 2%
Tour Nz 10/10 3175 days 2%
Brooke Cooper 10/10 3209 days 2%
Mary Irvine 10/10 3403 days 2%
Rima 10/10 3480 days 2%
Barbara Blair 9/10 3488 days 2%
Jane Knowles 10/10 3510 days 2%
Elizabeth Braidotti 10/10 3547 days 2%
Lyn Pobke 8/10 3663 days 1%
Aaron wood 10/10 3744 days 1%
Jiri Lakosil 10/10 3805 days 1%
María del Carmen Escandell 10/10 3915 days 1%
Elles Janssen 8/10 4180 days 0%
Daniel Capener 9/10 4334 days 0%
Steven and Nikki De Vries 9/10 4425 days 1%
Malcolm & Susan 9/10 4455 days 1%
Mere Henry 10/10 4637 days 1%
Buzzcook 10/10 4760 days 1%
Sylvia Buckley 10/10 4849 days 1%
David Restell 9/10 4849 days 1%
Brittney Caird 10/10 4880 days 1%
Skye Adlam 10/10 4880 days 1%
FantasticNZ 9/10 5094 days 1%
krlekta 10/10 5430 days 1%
thornberrys 10/10 5642 days 1%

Adjustments

Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The All Seasons Holiday Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-0.87% Adjustment

There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 89 days. However the All Seasons Holiday Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.

The All Seasons Holiday Park experience has been adjusted for 61 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
58 -0.83%
59 -0.84%
60 -0.85%
61 -0.87%
62 -0.88%
63 -0.90%
64 -0.91%

Balancing Adjustment

2.91% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

83%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.