Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Ohiwa Beach Holiday Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at firstname.lastname@example.org. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
58 Valid Reviews
The Ohiwa Beach Holiday Park experience has a total of 60 reviews. There are 58 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 58 valid reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Ohiwa Beach Holiday Park valid reviews is 94.48% and is based on 58 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
6 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
Within the 58 valid reviews, the experience has 6 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 6 face-to-face reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Ohiwa Beach Holiday Park face-to-face reviews is 91.67% and is based on 6 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
|Brian Derbyshire||10/10||39 days||99.76||100%|
|James & Derryn||10/10||70 days||99.22||99%|
|Karen and Eric||10/10||131 days||97.28||98%|
|Meryl D||8/10||131 days||92.42||93%|
|Merle Bray, Elizabeth Watson & Bella||9/10||160 days||95.94||96%|
|Ian Campbell||10/10||191 days||94.22||94%|
|Andrew Bethell||9/10||191 days||94.22||94%|
|Dieter Giesen||10/10||222 days||92.19||92%|
|Neal Rastrick||10/10||252 days||89.94||90%|
|Mike Taylor||10/10||252 days||89.94||90%|
|Truds/ Shaun McGregor||10/10||344 days||81.25||81%|
|Tarina McKenzie||10/10||375 days||77.72||78%|
|Dianne Wade||10/10||405 days||74.01||74%|
|Cliff & Tracey||10/10||405 days||74.01||74%|
|Paul Smith||8/10||525 days||53.51||54%|
|Alan & Lesley Ball||9/10||525 days||56.32||56%|
|John Zoetebier||2/10||556 days||38.28||38%|
|phil smith||9/10||556 days||51.04||51%|
|Anne & John||10/10||709 days||28.61||29%|
|Chris&Kevin Rush||10/10||801 days||18.7||19%|
|Paul and Nat Wright||10/10||831 days||16.04||16%|
|Dan Kilkelly||10/10||831 days||16.04||16%|
|John Curries||10/10||862 days||13.6||14%|
|Trish & Ian||10/10||862 days||13.6||14%|
|Jenny Sullivan||10/10||862 days||13.6||14%|
|Tina and Terry||9/10||890 days||11.66||12%|
|Katie Wiffin||10/10||921 days||9.8||10%|
|kay henderson||10/10||921 days||9.8||10%|
|Phil and Dianne Neal||9/10||922 days||9.74||10%|
|Leith Milson||10/10||982 days||7.02||7%|
|John Peddie||10/10||1561 days||4.09||4%|
|York Tüchelmann||10/10||1586 days||4.04||4%|
|Liz Peters||10/10||1592 days||4.03||4%|
|Shelley Martin||10/10||1621 days||3.97||4%|
|Debbie Thomas||10/10||1652 days||3.91||4%|
|Hana Rachfalik||10/10||1671 days||3.87||4%|
|Sheriden Derby||10/10||1927 days||3.37||3%|
|Trevor Brown||9/10||2009 days||3.21||3%|
|C&P Macwhippy||9/10||2292 days||2.66||3%|
|Daisy Shasta||10/10||2330 days||2.58||3%|
|Rita Hochstiasser||9/10||2348 days||2.55||3%|
|Jacqui V||7/10||2351 days||2.31||2%|
|Brendan K||10/10||2351 days||2.54||3%|
|E and C Tipuna||10/10||2382 days||2.48||2%|
|Jenny Hall||7/10||2413 days||2.2||2%|
|Tracie Thornborough||10/10||2413 days||2.42||2%|
|justin butler||10/10||2413 days||2.42||2%|
|Mick McIvor||10/10||2504 days||2.24||2%|
|E Smudde||8/10||3066 days||1.09||1%|
|Eric & Liz McKean||10/10||3401 days||0.49||0%|
|Pieter Middeldorp||8/10||3780 days||0.0||0%|
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Ohiwa Beach Holiday Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 125 days. However the Ohiwa Beach Holiday Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Ohiwa Beach Holiday Park experience has been adjusted for 35 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
The final ranking score once adjustments and rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at email@example.com.