Ranking Score Explained

Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Ohiwa Beach Holiday Park.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Nick Morrison's avatar

Nick Morrison

Rankers owner

Ohiwa Beach Holiday Park

Valid Reviews

56 Valid Reviews

The Ohiwa Beach Holiday Park experience has a total of 58 reviews. There are 56 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 2 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 56 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 39
70%
9/10 10
18%
8/10 4
7%
7/10 2
4%
6/10 0
0%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 1
2%
1/10 0
0%

94.29% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Ohiwa Beach Holiday Park valid reviews is 94.29% and is based on 56 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Face-to-Face Reviews

6 Face-to-Face Reviews

The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.

More about face-to-face reviews

Within the 56 valid reviews, the experience has 6 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 6 face-to-face reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 3
50%
9/10 1
17%
8/10 2
33%
7/10 0
0%
6/10 0
0%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

91.67% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Ohiwa Beach Holiday Park face-to-face reviews is 91.67% and is based on 6 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.

Weighted Average

94.56%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Face-to-Face Weight Relative Weight
Karen and Eric 10/10 40 days 99.75 100%
Meryl D 8/10 40 days 94.76 95%
Merle Bray, Elizabeth Watson & Bella 9/10 69 days 99.25 99%
Ian Campbell 10/10 100 days 98.42 99%
Andrew Bethell 9/10 100 days 98.42 99%
Johannes 10/10 131 days 97.28 98%
Dieter Giesen 10/10 131 days 97.28 98%
Neal Rastrick 10/10 161 days 95.89 96%
Mike Taylor 10/10 161 days 95.89 96%
Truds/ Shaun McGregor 10/10 253 days 89.86 90%
Rachael 10/10 284 days 87.22 87%
Tarina McKenzie 10/10 284 days 87.22 87%
Dianne Wade 10/10 314 days 84.38 85%
Cliff & Tracey 10/10 314 days 84.38 85%
Beth 10/10 375 days 77.72 78%
Liz 10/10 375 days 77.72 78%
Paul Smith 8/10 434 days 66.65 67%
Alan & Lesley Ball 9/10 434 days 70.15 70%
John Zoetebier 2/10 465 days 49.3 49%
phil smith 9/10 465 days 65.74 66%
Anne & John 10/10 618 days 41.05 41%
Chris&Kevin Rush 10/10 710 days 28.49 29%
Paul and Nat Wright 10/10 740 days 24.97 25%
Dan Kilkelly 10/10 740 days 24.97 25%
John Curries 10/10 771 days 21.63 22%
Trish & Ian 10/10 771 days 21.63 22%
Jenny Sullivan 10/10 771 days 21.63 22%
Tina and Terry 9/10 799 days 18.88 19%
Katie Wiffin 10/10 829 days 16.21 16%
kay henderson 10/10 829 days 16.21 16%
Phil and Dianne Neal 9/10 831 days 16.04 16%
Leith Milson 10/10 890 days 11.66 12%
John Peddie 10/10 1469 days 4.27 4%
York Tüchelmann 10/10 1495 days 4.22 4%
Liz Peters 10/10 1500 days 4.21 4%
Shelley Martin 10/10 1529 days 4.15 4%
Debbie Thomas 10/10 1560 days 4.09 4%
Hana Rachfalik 10/10 1580 days 4.05 4%
Sheriden Derby 10/10 1835 days 3.55 4%
Trevor Brown 9/10 1918 days 3.39 3%
BernardB 10/10 1925 days 3.38 3%
Jason 9/10 1925 days 3.38 3%
Ray 10/10 2124 days true 2.99 3%
C&P Macwhippy 9/10 2201 days 2.84 3%
Daisy Shasta 10/10 2239 days true 2.76 3%
Rita Hochstiasser 9/10 2257 days true 2.73 3%
Jacqui V 7/10 2260 days 2.48 2%
Brendan K 10/10 2260 days 2.72 3%
E and C Tipuna 10/10 2290 days 2.66 3%
Jenny Hall 7/10 2322 days 2.36 2%
Tracie Thornborough 10/10 2322 days 2.6 3%
justin butler 10/10 2322 days 2.6 3%
Mick McIvor 10/10 2413 days 2.42 2%
E Smudde 8/10 2975 days true 1.25 1%
Eric & Liz McKean 10/10 3310 days true 0.67 1%
Pieter Middeldorp 8/10 3689 days true 0.0 0%

Adjustments

Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Ohiwa Beach Holiday Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-0.23% Adjustment

There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 63 days. However the Ohiwa Beach Holiday Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.

The Ohiwa Beach Holiday Park experience has been adjusted for 13 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
10 -0.18%
11 -0.20%
12 -0.21%
13 -0.23%
14 -0.25%
15 -0.27%
16 -0.28%

Final Ranking Score

94%

The final ranking score once adjustments and rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.