Ranking Score Explained

Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Omokoroa Thermal Holiday Park.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Nick Morrison's avatar

Nick Morrison

Rankers owner

Omokoroa Thermal Holiday Park

Valid Reviews

71 Valid Reviews

The Omokoroa Thermal Holiday Park experience has a total of 71 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Within these 71 valid reviews, the experience has 1 face-to-face review collected during interviews by our team.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 71 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 41
58%
9/10 19
27%
8/10 3
4%
7/10 7
10%
6/10 0
0%
5/10 1
1%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

92.82% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Omokoroa Thermal Holiday Park valid reviews is 92.82% and is based on 71 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Weighted Average

91.64%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Face-to-Face Weight Relative Weight
Lord Barker 10/10 327 days 83.06 100%
Nat 7/10 449 days 68.05 82%
Phil Liu 10/10 449 days 68.05 82%
Tracey Ryan 10/10 1330 days 4.68 4%
kim t 10/10 1331 days 4.68 4%
David 9/10 1483 days 4.47 3%
Chris Burgin 7/10 1544 days 4.38 3%
Chris Ogilvie 9/10 1572 days 4.35 3%
Mat FX 5/10 1572 days 4.35 3%
grant willis 7/10 1572 days 4.35 3%
Ian Watson 10/10 1626 days 4.27 3%
Daryl Morrell 10/10 1634 days 4.26 3%
Heather Kingston 9/10 1634 days 4.26 3%
Andrew Deamer 10/10 1695 days 4.18 3%
Gary Spaz 10/10 1695 days 4.18 3%
mamsie 9/10 1818 days 4.01 3%
Del Townsend 10/10 1879 days 3.93 3%
Debbie Jacobs 9/10 1969 days 3.8 3%
leonard 10/10 2183 days 3.51 2%
Caitlin Etherington 10/10 2214 days 3.47 2%
dontstayathome 10/10 2244 days 3.43 2%
Margaret_Sao 10/10 2275 days 3.38 2%
Stu Turner 7/10 2275 days 3.38 2%
Narik Eyr 10/10 2303 days 3.35 2%
Kylie Forsythe 9/10 2303 days 3.35 2%
Swee Han Lim 9/10 2334 days 3.3 2%
Simone 10/10 2334 days 3.3 2%
lleary 9/10 2365 days 3.26 2%
flan 10/10 2395 days 3.22 2%
carsonh 9/10 2426 days 3.18 2%
margs157 10/10 2426 days 3.18 2%
sharongwinnell 10/10 2426 days 3.18 2%
brian_olsen 10/10 2456 days 3.14 2%
Lollies 10/10 2456 days 3.14 2%
Janm1 10/10 2456 days 3.14 2%
Shaunr 7/10 2487 days 3.09 2%
Minpin 10/10 2487 days 3.09 2%
huggyfamily 10/10 2518 days 3.05 2%
imriewilson 10/10 2518 days 3.05 2%
Phil_and_Marion 10/10 2548 days 3.01 2%
DMM72 7/10 2609 days 2.93 2%
annieG 9/10 2669 days 2.84 1%
sandyd 10/10 2700 days 2.8 1%
akglenny 8/10 2700 days 2.8 1%
KerenP 9/10 2700 days 2.8 1%
cmr0551 9/10 2700 days 2.8 1%
nztravel 10/10 2731 days 2.76 1%
Chippyroo 10/10 2761 days 2.72 1%
AndreaE 10/10 2792 days 2.68 1%
mincemeat 9/10 2822 days 2.63 1%
nicang 10/10 2914 days 2.51 1%
Jon_and_Family 9/10 2975 days 2.42 1%
Reiner 10/10 3006 days 2.38 1%
k1k1barb 10/10 3034 days 2.34 1%
rachelsloane 10/10 3065 days 2.3 1%
moriyah 9/10 3065 days 2.3 1%
zeppie 10/10 3065 days 2.3 1%
mandm 10/10 3096 days 2.26 1%
Mary 9/10 3096 days 2.26 1%
mkire 10/10 3096 days 2.26 1%
Leem 9/10 3157 days 2.18 1%
jhwjhw 9/10 3157 days 2.18 1%
bshive_on_the_go 10/10 3187 days 2.13 1%
avolkov 10/10 3249 days 2.05 1%
seamew 10/10 3249 days 2.05 1%
unibar 8/10 3249 days 2.05 1%
SandieB 7/10 3249 days 2.05 1%
chrismuz 10/10 3279 days 2.01 0%
JBH68 9/10 3430 days 1.8 0%
scullywag 10/10 3430 days 1.8 0%
Viola 8/10 3747 days true 1.64 0%

Adjustments

Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Omokoroa Thermal Holiday Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-6.50% Adjustment

There may be an adjustment if an experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 60 days. However the Omokoroa Thermal Holiday Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 364 days.

The Omokoroa Thermal Holiday Park experience has been adjusted for 325 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
322 -6.44%
323 -6.46%
324 -6.48%
325 -6.50%
326 -6.52%
327 -6.54%
328 -6.56%

Final Ranking Score

85%

The final ranking score once adjustments and rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.

Love Christchurch