Hello there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Katikati Naturist Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at email@example.com. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
32 Valid Reviews
The Katikati Naturist Park experience has a total of 35 reviews. There are 32 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 3 invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Within these 32 valid reviews, the experience has 2 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 32 valid reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Katikati Naturist Park valid reviews is 91.56% and is based on 32 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
|J & M||10/10||260 days||92%|
|Liz Waikato||7/10||382 days||72%|
|Piriniha Te Tau||8/10||655 days||35%|
|Wolfgang Himme||3/10||686 days||25%|
|JB Banderas||5/10||1205 days||4%|
|Miss C||9/10||1325 days||4%|
|Peter Starling||10/10||1659 days||4%|
|Robyn-Elizabeth Whalley||8/10||1690 days||3%|
|Dorothea Rueb||10/10||2055 days||3%|
|Margaret Newall||10/10||2086 days||3%|
|Daniel Mulley||10/10||2086 days||3%|
|Michael Burke||10/10||2116 days||3%|
|Jax Lewis||10/10||2421 days||2%|
|karl Broadfield||10/10||2421 days||2%|
|Peter Swart||10/10||2452 days||2%|
|Ian Horsgood||10/10||2452 days||2%|
|Michael Naturist||10/10||2482 days||2%|
|Michael Burke||10/10||2482 days||2%|
|Steven Brown||10/10||2543 days||2%|
|Capt. James O'Donnell||10/10||3031 days||1%|
|Julie Ledanois||9/10||3103 days||0%|
|Pierre Gentile||8/10||3103 days||0%|
|Grant & Imeleta||10/10||3120 days||1%|
|Tony Enchmarch||10/10||3243 days||0%|
|Dieter & Lydia Schmees||10/10||3485 days||0%|
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Katikati Naturist Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 111 days. However the Katikati Naturist Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Katikati Naturist Park experience has been adjusted for 89 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at firstname.lastname@example.org.