Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Mount John via Lakeshore.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at email@example.com. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
50 Valid Reviews
The Mount John via Lakeshore experience has a total of 50 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 50 valid reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mount John via Lakeshore valid reviews is 88.80% and is based on 50 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
45 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
Within the 50 valid reviews, the experience has 45 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 45 face-to-face reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Mount John via Lakeshore face-to-face reviews is 88.67% and is based on 45 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
|Mike Fricker||10/10||354 days||80.14||86%|
|Fredrik Lundberg||10/10||944 days||8.61||9%|
|Anthony Terry||7/10||1030 days||5.16||5%|
|Jill Grange||8/10||1046 days||5.11||5%|
|Coralie Dhenin||8/10||1270 days||4.47||4%|
|Jean-Pierre Guillon||9/10||1272 days||4.7||5%|
|Michael L||9/10||1290 days||4.67||5%|
|Lucy Mulvin||9/10||1293 days||4.66||5%|
|Ivan Dupont||8/10||1339 days||4.35||4%|
|Jeroen Suijlang||8/10||2002 days||3.27||3%|
|Julian Kuemme||8/10||2004 days||3.27||3%|
|Mandy Reich||8/10||2005 days||3.27||3%|
|Eva-Maria Krueger||10/10||2029 days||3.4||3%|
|Anne and Steve Bartlett||9/10||2080 days||3.31||3%|
|Jesse Farrell||9/10||2097 days||3.28||3%|
|Orla Hughes||9/10||2097 days||3.28||3%|
|Bettina Fluhrer||10/10||2379 days||2.8||3%|
|Stientje van den Heuvel||9/10||2380 days||2.8||3%|
|Toomas Viilus||10/10||2390 days||2.78||3%|
|Chantal Mortel||8/10||2399 days||2.63||3%|
|Jeanne Moustier||10/10||2435 days||2.71||3%|
|Abby Rushmer||10/10||2483 days||2.62||3%|
|Barbara Berkhout||9/10||2744 days||2.18||2%|
|Jill Homewood||10/10||2752 days||2.16||2%|
|Daniel Patricia||8/10||2762 days||2.04||2%|
|Marion Hassink||9/10||2765 days||2.14||2%|
|Melanie Mathiak||10/10||2771 days||2.13||2%|
|Chris Marsh||10/10||2785 days||2.11||2%|
|Kornelia Kirf||10/10||3115 days||1.54||1%|
|Jim & Rebecca||9/10||3117 days||1.54||1%|
|Lauren Pestell||9/10||3132 days||1.51||1%|
|Jennie McIver||9/10||3140 days||1.5||1%|
|Doris Neuber||9/10||3152 days||1.48||1%|
|Cuz da Maori||6/10||3245 days||1.09||1%|
|Kaddi & Grego||7/10||3491 days||0.82||1%|
|Rolf X||9/10||3500 days||0.88||1%|
|Ian E||9/10||3514 days||0.86||1%|
|Peter Bowen-Simpkins||9/10||3844 days||0.29||0%|
Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Mount John via Lakeshore does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.
The final ranking score once rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at firstname.lastname@example.org.