Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Paihia Top 10 Holiday Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at firstname.lastname@example.org. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
86 Valid Reviews
The Paihia Top 10 Holiday Park experience has a total of 86 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 86 valid reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Paihia Top 10 Holiday Park valid reviews is 85.81% and is based on 86 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
30 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
Within the 86 valid reviews, the experience has 30 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 30 face-to-face reviews:
The raw data average (mean) for all the Paihia Top 10 Holiday Park face-to-face reviews is 86.67% and is based on 30 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
|Lunar Orbit||9/10||105 days||100%|
|Anna Swain||10/10||289 days||88%|
|Marg Dale||7/10||320 days||78%|
|Chris Harding||9/10||442 days||70%|
|Ian & Wendy||10/10||807 days||18%|
|Alex Tikonoff||9/10||867 days||13%|
|Ancient Uncle||6/10||959 days||6%|
|D and I singh||10/10||1051 days||5%|
|ian kennedy||9/10||1324 days||4%|
|Daphne H||9/10||1354 days||4%|
|Emma Medina||10/10||1563 days||4%|
|Jim Bass||9/10||1566 days||4%|
|Joe Trigg||9/10||1652 days||4%|
|Paul Smith||7/10||1931 days||3%|
|James Braithwaite||9/10||1938 days||3%|
|Saskia Ruttor||9/10||2022 days||3%|
|Mark Johnston||9/10||2033 days||3%|
|Stephanie Oliver||7/10||2132 days||2%|
|Jude and Chris||10/10||2214 days||3%|
|Justyna Blajerska||5/10||2244 days||2%|
|Casa Tone||9/10||2254 days||2%|
|Julia Clearwater||10/10||2311 days||2%|
|Heather Peart||10/10||2327 days||2%|
|Sally Young||10/10||2358 days||2%|
|Norbert Dekker Kleijn||8/10||2389 days||2%|
|Denelle Coutts||10/10||2439 days||2%|
|Jule & Thomas aus Hamburg Elternzeit 2015||8/10||2449 days||2%|
|J V Henare||7/10||2539 days||2%|
|Gregory Agnoux||9/10||2571 days||2%|
|Matt Betts||8/10||2578 days||2%|
|Colin Petherbridge||8/10||2629 days||2%|
|Dani Bummler||2/10||2686 days||1%|
|Mike Fricker||8/10||2938 days||1%|
|Dusty Miller||9/10||2968 days||1%|
|Simon Mehlmann||9/10||2976 days||1%|
|Andrew Luke||9/10||3013 days||1%|
|Jade Fleming||7/10||3119 days||1%|
|David Wood||9/10||3150 days||1%|
|Shantell Hunter||8/10||3242 days||0%|
|Steven Wood||8/10||3423 days||0%|
|Claudia Mueller||9/10||3459 days||0%|
|Lotte Uneken||10/10||3466 days||0%|
|Helmut Schmid||7/10||3723 days||0%|
|Ronald Veldman||7/10||3736 days||0%|
|Susie Christensen||9/10||3744 days||1%|
|Ralph & Marloes Meyers||8/10||4063 days||1%|
|Chris Ashton||8/10||4089 days||1%|
|Roman & Esther||10/10||4092 days||1%|
|Chris White||7/10||4102 days||0%|
|Peter & Margo Boullin||10/10||4103 days||1%|
|Simon Vallis||9/10||4114 days||1%|
|Andrew Hammond||8/10||4246 days||1%|
|Bob Lenihan||10/10||4446 days||1%|
|Alan & Lorna||8/10||4453 days||1%|
|John N||8/10||4454 days||1%|
|Ivo Braakhuis||8/10||4468 days||1%|
|Regina Giger||10/10||4485 days||1%|
|Taya Cross||9/10||4488 days||1%|
|EA Anders||9/10||4505 days||1%|
|Werner Swiss||10/10||4510 days||1%|
|Dawn Campbell||8/10||4519 days||1%|
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Paihia Top 10 Holiday Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 93 days. However the Paihia Top 10 Holiday Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Paihia Top 10 Holiday Park experience has been adjusted for 81 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
The final ranking score once adjustments and rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at email@example.com.