Ranking Score Explained
Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for PureTrails New Zealand.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
PureTrails New Zealand
Valid Reviews
53 Valid Reviews
The PureTrails New Zealand experience has a total of 54 reviews. There are 53 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 53 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 38 |
|
72% |
| 9/10 | 15 |
|
28% |
| 8/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
97.17% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the PureTrails New Zealand valid reviews is 97.17% and is based on 53 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Weighted Average
98.12%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Face-to-Face | Weight | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gordon | 10/10 | 94 days | 98.6 | 100% | |
| Alias Gertrude | 10/10 | 429 days | 70.84 | 72% | |
| Jan | 10/10 | 429 days | 70.84 | 72% | |
| helen mclean | 10/10 | 460 days | 66.47 | 67% | |
| John Hayman | 9/10 | 580 days | 47.03 | 47% | |
| wendy mesley | 9/10 | 794 days | 19.36 | 19% | |
| Michelle | 10/10 | 794 days | 19.36 | 19% | |
| Derwin Arnstead | 10/10 | 884 days | 12.05 | 11% | |
| Anne Duncan | 10/10 | 1249 days | 4.7 | 4% | |
| Nick Smith | 9/10 | 1555 days | 4.1 | 3% | |
| Fiona | 9/10 | 1555 days | 4.1 | 3% | |
| Dianne Kidd | 10/10 | 1584 days | 4.04 | 3% | |
| David Darmanin | 10/10 | 1584 days | 4.04 | 3% | |
| Sam | 10/10 | 1615 days | 3.98 | 3% | |
| Julie B | 10/10 | 1646 days | 3.92 | 3% | |
| Janelle Varlow | 10/10 | 1676 days | 3.86 | 3% | |
| Helen Bryan | 10/10 | 1890 days | 3.44 | 3% | |
| Geoff Bartlett | 10/10 | 1921 days | 3.38 | 2% | |
| Diana Houtman | 10/10 | 1921 days | 3.38 | 2% | |
| Mary Karl | 10/10 | 1921 days | 3.38 | 2% | |
| fgiacoma | 9/10 | 1949 days | 3.33 | 2% | |
| ross murray | 10/10 | 1980 days | 3.27 | 2% | |
| Jane Geldenhuys | 10/10 | 2011 days | 3.21 | 2% | |
| Ian Anderson | 10/10 | 2011 days | 3.21 | 2% | |
| Ros Noone | 9/10 | 2041 days | 3.15 | 2% | |
| Peter Hales | 9/10 | 2255 days | 2.73 | 2% | |
| David Vinsen | 10/10 | 2286 days | 2.67 | 2% | |
| Caroline Barber | 9/10 | 2314 days | 2.61 | 2% | |
| Denise McMahon | 9/10 | 2314 days | 2.61 | 2% | |
| cmh | 10/10 | 2406 days | 2.43 | 1% | |
| John Marchment | 10/10 | 2437 days | 2.37 | 1% | |
| Ian and Chris Homann | 10/10 | 2651 days | 1.95 | 1% | |
| Nancy Stone | 10/10 | 2679 days | 1.9 | 1% | |
| Graham Bamford | 10/10 | 2710 days | 1.84 | 1% | |
| pauart | 10/10 | 2771 days | 1.72 | 1% | |
| jennic | 9/10 | 2802 days | 1.66 | 1% | |
| smithereen | 10/10 | 2985 days | 1.3 | 0% | |
| Maryel | 10/10 | 2985 days | 1.3 | 0% | |
| Woods | 10/10 | 3016 days | 1.24 | 0% | |
| JennyT | 10/10 | 3016 days | 1.24 | 0% | |
| maureenmf | 10/10 | 3016 days | 1.24 | 0% | |
| frankie | 10/10 | 3016 days | 1.24 | 0% | |
| FrancesJ | 9/10 | 3016 days | 1.24 | 0% | |
| AlanWillow | 10/10 | 3016 days | 1.24 | 0% | |
| cribble | 9/10 | 3016 days | 1.24 | 0% | |
| shoanthomson | 10/10 | 3016 days | 1.24 | 0% | |
| Montpellier | 9/10 | 3045 days | 1.18 | 0% | |
| LIZ_MONTGOMERY | 10/10 | 3076 days | 1.12 | 0% | |
| upmack | 10/10 | 3076 days | 1.12 | 0% | |
| Michael73 | 10/10 | 3107 days | 1.06 | 0% | |
| LizH | 10/10 | 3137 days | 1.0 | 0% | |
| lyndab | 9/10 | 3137 days | 1.0 | 0% | |
| frendoj | 9/10 | 3137 days | 1.0 | 0% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The PureTrails New Zealand experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-0.87% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 108 days. However the PureTrails New Zealand experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The PureTrails New Zealand experience has been adjusted for 73 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 70 | -0.84% |
| 71 | -0.85% |
| 72 | -0.86% |
| 73 | -0.87% |
| 74 | -0.89% |
| 75 | -0.90% |
| 76 | -0.91% |
| … | … |
Final Ranking Score
97%
The final ranking score once adjustments and rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.