Kia ora, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Shantytown Heritage Park.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
67 Valid Reviews
The Shantytown Heritage Park experience has a total of 68 reviews. There are 67 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 67 valid reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 16 |
|
24% |
9/10 | 9 |
|
13% |
8/10 | 20 |
|
30% |
7/10 | 13 |
|
19% |
6/10 | 6 |
|
9% |
5/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
4/10 | 1 |
|
1% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
80.90% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Shantytown Heritage Park valid reviews is 80.90% and is based on 67 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
61 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 67 valid reviews, the experience has 61 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 61 face-to-face reviews:
Rating | Count | Percentage | |
---|---|---|---|
10/10 | 14 |
|
23% |
9/10 | 8 |
|
13% |
8/10 | 19 |
|
31% |
7/10 | 11 |
|
18% |
6/10 | 6 |
|
10% |
5/10 | 2 |
|
3% |
4/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
80.49% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Shantytown Heritage Park face-to-face reviews is 80.49% and is based on 61 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
81.85%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
---|---|---|---|
Justine | 9/10 | 1687 days | 100% |
Jozef Pinkerton | 7/10 | 2681 days | 51% |
Sven Fimne | 9/10 | 2916 days | 46% |
Sammy Kerrod | 8/10 | 2956 days | 45% |
Jasmin Krause | 8/10 | 2980 days | 44% |
Michael Busching | 10/10 | 3228 days | 37% |
Gesche | 6/10 | 3233 days | 31% |
Ben and Pauline | 7/10 | 3252 days | 33% |
Martin Bakker | 9/10 | 3318 days | 33% |
Kristina Farkas | 10/10 | 3621 days | 24% |
Patricia Revel | 9/10 | 3941 days | 13% |
Mirjam Betschart | 7/10 | 3985 days | 11% |
Marinette | 7/10 | 3986 days | 11% |
Barbara | 8/10 | 3986 days | 12% |
Saskia | 9/10 | 3997 days | 11% |
Derek Knight | 10/10 | 4013 days | 11% |
Jacqui Knight | 9/10 | 4013 days | 11% |
Jim | 10/10 | 4347 days | 0% |
sandytemp22 | 10/10 | 4670 days | 16% |
Norman UK | 8/10 | 4693 days | 15% |
Richard & Jane | 8/10 | 4710 days | 15% |
Hazel & Alan Damerell | 10/10 | 4712 days | 16% |
Sabine & Stefan | 8/10 | 4714 days | 15% |
Des & Ann Bidwell | 10/10 | 4725 days | 16% |
Ray Coombe | 10/10 | 4804 days | 16% |
Therea | 10/10 | 5035 days | 16% |
Michaela Strohmarer | 10/10 | 5059 days | 16% |
B Kleven | 6/10 | 5061 days | 13% |
Mike and Diane Baker | 8/10 | 5068 days | 15% |
Jackie Morris | 8/10 | 5086 days | 15% |
Barbara | 8/10 | 5088 days | 15% |
Friedli Manuela | 8/10 | 5090 days | 15% |
Polil | 9/10 | 5418 days | 16% |
Arnold | 7/10 | 5423 days | 15% |
Pam & Norman | 8/10 | 5425 days | 15% |
Rod C | 10/10 | 5430 days | 16% |
Schlaepfer | 7/10 | 5434 days | 15% |
Yssel de Schepper | 8/10 | 5438 days | 15% |
Janny Meerdinnk Veldboow | 7/10 | 5438 days | 15% |
Armand | 9/10 | 5446 days | 16% |
Yona | 7/10 | 5446 days | 15% |
Schygulla | 6/10 | 5452 days | 13% |
Nadine Schaee | 8/10 | 5457 days | 15% |
Anne Fri | 8/10 | 5459 days | 15% |
Don Morgan | 10/10 | 5473 days | 16% |
Ann Grandchamp | 7/10 | 5474 days | 15% |
Beverly B | 7/10 | 5474 days | 15% |
Chung Family | 8/10 | 5480 days | 15% |
niekv | 6/10 | 5507 days | 13% |
chessum | 8/10 | 5552 days | 15% |
kindel | 9/10 | 5648 days | 16% |
AndyEngland | 7/10 | 5754 days | 15% |
StephaineFrance | 7/10 | 5763 days | 15% |
Dirk | 8/10 | 5765 days | 15% |
Jean | 4/10 | 5770 days | 10% |
OdiliaF | 10/10 | 5785 days | 16% |
CateNetherlands | 5/10 | 5785 days | 12% |
Hetty | 8/10 | 5797 days | 15% |
NikkiB1 | 10/10 | 5801 days | 16% |
Ludolph | 5/10 | 5838 days | 12% |
chubby69 | 8/10 | 6009 days | 15% |
Sanne | 8/10 | 6159 days | 15% |
Jurg Meister | 6/10 | 6166 days | 13% |
Sabine Feiner | 10/10 | 6171 days | 16% |
April | 10/10 | 6175 days | 16% |
peters | 7/10 | 6198 days | 15% |
Pam | 6/10 | 6522 days | 13% |
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Shantytown Heritage Park experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
-4.07% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 45 days. However the Shantytown Heritage Park experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Shantytown Heritage Park experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
Days | Adjustment |
---|---|
… | … |
197 | -4.01% |
198 | -4.03% |
199 | -4.05% |
200 | -4.07% |
201 | -4.09% |
202 | -4.11% |
203 | -4.13% |
… | … |
3.66% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
81%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.