Ranking Score Explained
Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Te Pō.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Te Pō
Valid Reviews
49 Valid Reviews
The Te Pō experience has a total of 49 valid reviews. There are no invalid reviews that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 49 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 8 |
|
16% |
| 9/10 | 17 |
|
35% |
| 8/10 | 13 |
|
27% |
| 7/10 | 3 |
|
6% |
| 6/10 | 6 |
|
12% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
82.04% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Te Pō valid reviews is 82.04% and is based on 49 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Face-to-Face Reviews
44 Face-to-Face Reviews
The Rankers team meets with travellers while they’re in New Zealand and conducts face-to-face surveys. These reviews, in our opinion, are the most trusted in the industry and represent a critical control sample. To our knowledge, we are the only travel review website in the world that has gone to this extent.
More about face-to-face reviews
Within the 49 valid reviews, the experience has 44 face-to-face reviews collected during interviews by our team.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 44 face-to-face reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 5 |
|
11% |
| 9/10 | 15 |
|
34% |
| 8/10 | 13 |
|
30% |
| 7/10 | 3 |
|
7% |
| 6/10 | 6 |
|
14% |
| 5/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 1 |
|
2% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
80.45% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Te Pō face-to-face reviews is 80.45% and is based on 44 face-to-face reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here for comparison purposes.
Weighted Average
81.23%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jeny Smolders | 9/10 | 1665 days | 100% |
| Melanie Farrell | 3/10 | 1912 days | 64% |
| Laura Moore | 6/10 | 2267 days | 54% |
| Malina | 8/10 | 2344 days | 59% |
| Christian Maruhn | 10/10 | 2420 days | 58% |
| Rhys Williams | 8/10 | 3023 days | 23% |
| Ruth Watkin | 7/10 | 3023 days | 22% |
| Lisa Blake | 9/10 | 3470 days | 0% |
| Burkard Fabu | 8/10 | 3721 days | 17% |
| smac | 9/10 | 3729 days | 18% |
| Graham Platt | 9/10 | 3738 days | 18% |
| Tom Pratt | 9/10 | 3741 days | 18% |
| Preben vil Helmsen | 8/10 | 3741 days | 17% |
| Verne Heath | 8/10 | 3743 days | 17% |
| Lardy | 9/10 | 3837 days | 18% |
| Sabine Tippman | 6/10 | 4081 days | 14% |
| Krabbe | 8/10 | 4086 days | 17% |
| Jane & Regis | 9/10 | 4111 days | 18% |
| Dave and Emma | 6/10 | 4111 days | 14% |
| Graham | 7/10 | 4111 days | 16% |
| Sarah Ewing | 9/10 | 4120 days | 18% |
| Johan Wisselo | 8/10 | 4480 days | 17% |
| Nick | 9/10 | 4487 days | 18% |
| Greg Gerritz | 10/10 | 4487 days | 18% |
| Angela Stringer | 9/10 | 4519 days | 18% |
| Christian Jean Louis | 6/10 | 4552 days | 14% |
| Helen Pet | 8/10 | 4558 days | 17% |
| Elodie | 6/10 | 4561 days | 14% |
| Ton Buil | 9/10 | 4562 days | 18% |
| lorah | 10/10 | 4684 days | 18% |
| minniemags | 10/10 | 4764 days | 18% |
| desl | 10/10 | 4794 days | 18% |
| Katy1 | 9/10 | 4796 days | 18% |
| JohannesGermany | 8/10 | 4811 days | 17% |
| Eva | 9/10 | 4834 days | 18% |
| Miha | 10/10 | 4898 days | 18% |
| Ana | 9/10 | 4906 days | 18% |
| Jacinta | 5/10 | 4924 days | 13% |
| Terry | 8/10 | 4984 days | 17% |
| David Finlay | 10/10 | 5066 days | 18% |
| Vikki | 10/10 | 5170 days | 18% |
| Olaf Penn | 8/10 | 5185 days | 17% |
| Naomi Horton | 6/10 | 5187 days | 14% |
| Mike and Joyce Timms | 9/10 | 5187 days | 18% |
| Kathy Hawey | 9/10 | 5193 days | 18% |
| David Buckley | 8/10 | 5194 days | 17% |
| John Woodrow | 9/10 | 5195 days | 18% |
| Orlaith | 7/10 | 5207 days | 16% |
| beesom | 8/10 | 5560 days | 17% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Te Pō experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-2.76% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 93 days. However the Te Pō experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Te Pō experience has been adjusted for 200 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 197 | -2.72% |
| 198 | -2.73% |
| 199 | -2.74% |
| 200 | -2.76% |
| 201 | -2.77% |
| 202 | -2.79% |
| 203 | -2.80% |
| … | … |
Final Ranking Score
78%
The final ranking score once adjustments and rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.