G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Western Springs Spot.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Western Springs Spot
Valid Reviews
82 Valid Reviews
The Western Springs Spot experience has a total of 83 reviews. There are 82 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 82 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 77 |
|
94% |
| 9/10 | 5 |
|
6% |
| 8/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
99.39% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Western Springs Spot valid reviews is 99.39% and is based on 82 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Weighted Average
99.36%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tanya Schipp | 10/10 | 49 days | 100% |
| Ciara | 10/10 | 79 days | 100% |
| Connell | 10/10 | 79 days | 100% |
| Daliah El Kady | 10/10 | 110 days | 99% |
| Thaïs Van Burm | 10/10 | 110 days | 99% |
| Nadine Lutherborrow | 10/10 | 110 days | 99% |
| Ronja Reichenbacher | 10/10 | 138 days | 99% |
| Theo Martial | 10/10 | 138 days | 99% |
| Rose Boogaard | 10/10 | 138 days | 99% |
| Ann-Kristin Walek | 10/10 | 169 days | 98% |
| Henrike Grotsch | 10/10 | 200 days | 98% |
| Johann Münkner | 10/10 | 200 days | 98% |
| Claude Prigent | 10/10 | 261 days | 96% |
| Beccy | 9/10 | 261 days | 95% |
| Caleb | 10/10 | 261 days | 96% |
| Angèle Aveline | 10/10 | 261 days | 96% |
| Liss | 10/10 | 291 days | 95% |
| Carola Toppe | 10/10 | 383 days | 91% |
| Reinhild | 10/10 | 444 days | 88% |
| Jade Dufour | 9/10 | 444 days | 87% |
| Hubert Skudlik | 10/10 | 444 days | 88% |
| Lynn Dumoulin | 10/10 | 444 days | 88% |
| Michael Szott | 9/10 | 475 days | 86% |
| Mady Roosen | 10/10 | 503 days | 85% |
| Kerstin Wilmans | 10/10 | 503 days | 85% |
| OB | 10/10 | 503 days | 85% |
| Julie | 10/10 | 503 days | 85% |
| Di Sloan | 10/10 | 503 days | 85% |
| Jamie.wills@yahoo.co.uk | 10/10 | 503 days | 85% |
| David Weyel | 10/10 | 503 days | 85% |
| Holly | 10/10 | 534 days | 83% |
| Günter Handler | 10/10 | 534 days | 83% |
| Francois Petit | 10/10 | 534 days | 83% |
| Ruth Bosustow | 10/10 | 534 days | 83% |
| Emily | 10/10 | 534 days | 83% |
| Elisabeth Schraml | 10/10 | 534 days | 83% |
| Marta | 10/10 | 565 days | 81% |
| Jonathan Nelson | 10/10 | 565 days | 81% |
| Henry | 10/10 | 565 days | 81% |
| Verena Schöser | 10/10 | 565 days | 81% |
| Boy | 10/10 | 595 days | 79% |
| Karl-Friedrich Haenel | 10/10 | 595 days | 79% |
| Alice | 10/10 | 595 days | 79% |
| Hanna | 10/10 | 595 days | 79% |
| Matthias | 10/10 | 595 days | 79% |
| Stacey O | 10/10 | 656 days | 74% |
| Eva Holliwell | 10/10 | 687 days | 72% |
| Wouter | 9/10 | 687 days | 71% |
| Twinnz | 10/10 | 748 days | 67% |
| Rejane Noel | 10/10 | 748 days | 67% |
| Kornel Tornyos | 10/10 | 779 days | 64% |
| Florencia | 10/10 | 779 days | 64% |
| Tom Williams | 10/10 | 779 days | 64% |
| Barnabas Csoka | 10/10 | 779 days | 64% |
| Jelco | 10/10 | 809 days | 61% |
| Ondrej Visa | 10/10 | 809 days | 61% |
| TJ | 10/10 | 809 days | 61% |
| Caron | 10/10 | 840 days | 58% |
| Tristan Temme | 10/10 | 840 days | 58% |
| Niels | 10/10 | 840 days | 58% |
| Conny | 10/10 | 840 days | 58% |
| Alexander Kaulartz | 10/10 | 840 days | 58% |
| Andreas Meyer | 10/10 | 840 days | 58% |
| Franz Kestler | 10/10 | 840 days | 58% |
| Simone | 10/10 | 869 days | 55% |
| Lonneke van Westenbrugge | 10/10 | 869 days | 55% |
| Sarah Mongbo | 10/10 | 869 days | 55% |
| Matt | 10/10 | 961 days | 45% |
| Joe | 10/10 | 992 days | 42% |
| Lot | 9/10 | 992 days | 41% |
| Landon Brown | 10/10 | 992 days | 42% |
| Nolwenn | 10/10 | 992 days | 42% |
| Sean | 10/10 | 992 days | 42% |
| Sharon Hao | 10/10 | 992 days | 42% |
| Eva-Marie | 10/10 | 992 days | 42% |
| Léa Le Coquil | 10/10 | 1022 days | 39% |
| Angela Laloli | 10/10 | 1022 days | 39% |
| Bevan Haswell | 10/10 | 1022 days | 39% |
| Lisa | 10/10 | 1022 days | 39% |
| Mark | 10/10 | 1053 days | 36% |
| Euge y Luz | 10/10 | 1084 days | 33% |
| April REN | 10/10 | 1995 days | 0% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Western Springs Spot experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-0.48% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 118 days. However the Western Springs Spot experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Western Springs Spot experience has been adjusted for 44 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 41 | -0.44% |
| 42 | -0.45% |
| 43 | -0.47% |
| 44 | -0.48% |
| 45 | -0.49% |
| 46 | -0.50% |
| 47 | -0.51% |
| … | … |
Balancing Adjustment
0.09% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
99%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.