G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.
The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!
We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?
Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Western Springs Spot.
If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.
Western Springs Spot
Valid Reviews
82 Valid Reviews
The Western Springs Spot experience has a total of 83 reviews. There are 82 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.
Below is the distribution of ratings for the 82 valid reviews:
| Rating | Count | Percentage | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 10/10 | 77 |
|
94% |
| 9/10 | 5 |
|
6% |
| 8/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 7/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 6/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 5/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 4/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 3/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 2/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
| 1/10 | 0 |
|
0% |
99.39% Average
The raw data average (mean) for all the Western Springs Spot valid reviews is 99.39% and is based on 82 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.
Weighted Average
99.36%
Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.
Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.
Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.
Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.
| Reviewer | Rating | Age | Relative Weight |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tanya Schipp | 10/10 | 29 days | 100% |
| Ciara | 10/10 | 59 days | 100% |
| Connell | 10/10 | 59 days | 100% |
| Daliah El Kady | 10/10 | 90 days | 100% |
| Thaïs Van Burm | 10/10 | 90 days | 100% |
| Nadine Lutherborrow | 10/10 | 90 days | 100% |
| Ronja Reichenbacher | 10/10 | 118 days | 99% |
| Theo Martial | 10/10 | 118 days | 99% |
| Rose Boogaard | 10/10 | 118 days | 99% |
| Ann-Kristin Walek | 10/10 | 149 days | 99% |
| Henrike Grotsch | 10/10 | 180 days | 98% |
| Johann Münkner | 10/10 | 180 days | 98% |
| Claude Prigent | 10/10 | 241 days | 97% |
| Beccy | 9/10 | 241 days | 96% |
| Caleb | 10/10 | 241 days | 97% |
| Angèle Aveline | 10/10 | 241 days | 97% |
| Liss | 10/10 | 271 days | 96% |
| Carola Toppe | 10/10 | 363 days | 92% |
| Reinhild | 10/10 | 424 days | 89% |
| Jade Dufour | 9/10 | 424 days | 88% |
| Hubert Skudlik | 10/10 | 424 days | 89% |
| Lynn Dumoulin | 10/10 | 424 days | 89% |
| Michael Szott | 9/10 | 455 days | 87% |
| Mady Roosen | 10/10 | 483 days | 86% |
| Kerstin Wilmans | 10/10 | 483 days | 86% |
| OB | 10/10 | 483 days | 86% |
| Julie | 10/10 | 483 days | 86% |
| Di Sloan | 10/10 | 483 days | 86% |
| Jamie.wills@yahoo.co.uk | 10/10 | 483 days | 86% |
| David Weyel | 10/10 | 483 days | 86% |
| Holly | 10/10 | 514 days | 84% |
| Günter Handler | 10/10 | 514 days | 84% |
| Francois Petit | 10/10 | 514 days | 84% |
| Ruth Bosustow | 10/10 | 514 days | 84% |
| Emily | 10/10 | 514 days | 84% |
| Elisabeth Schraml | 10/10 | 514 days | 84% |
| Marta | 10/10 | 545 days | 82% |
| Jonathan Nelson | 10/10 | 545 days | 82% |
| Henry | 10/10 | 545 days | 82% |
| Verena Schöser | 10/10 | 545 days | 82% |
| Boy | 10/10 | 575 days | 80% |
| Karl-Friedrich Haenel | 10/10 | 575 days | 80% |
| Alice | 10/10 | 575 days | 80% |
| Hanna | 10/10 | 575 days | 80% |
| Matthias | 10/10 | 575 days | 80% |
| Stacey O | 10/10 | 636 days | 76% |
| Eva Holliwell | 10/10 | 667 days | 73% |
| Wouter | 9/10 | 667 days | 73% |
| Twinnz | 10/10 | 728 days | 68% |
| Rejane Noel | 10/10 | 728 days | 68% |
| Kornel Tornyos | 10/10 | 759 days | 66% |
| Florencia | 10/10 | 759 days | 66% |
| Tom Williams | 10/10 | 759 days | 66% |
| Barnabas Csoka | 10/10 | 759 days | 66% |
| Jelco | 10/10 | 789 days | 63% |
| Ondrej Visa | 10/10 | 789 days | 63% |
| TJ | 10/10 | 789 days | 63% |
| Caron | 10/10 | 820 days | 60% |
| Tristan Temme | 10/10 | 820 days | 60% |
| Niels | 10/10 | 820 days | 60% |
| Conny | 10/10 | 820 days | 60% |
| Alexander Kaulartz | 10/10 | 820 days | 60% |
| Andreas Meyer | 10/10 | 820 days | 60% |
| Franz Kestler | 10/10 | 820 days | 60% |
| Simone | 10/10 | 849 days | 57% |
| Lonneke van Westenbrugge | 10/10 | 849 days | 57% |
| Sarah Mongbo | 10/10 | 849 days | 57% |
| Matt | 10/10 | 941 days | 47% |
| Joe | 10/10 | 972 days | 44% |
| Lot | 9/10 | 972 days | 43% |
| Landon Brown | 10/10 | 972 days | 44% |
| Nolwenn | 10/10 | 972 days | 44% |
| Sean | 10/10 | 972 days | 44% |
| Sharon Hao | 10/10 | 972 days | 44% |
| Eva-Marie | 10/10 | 972 days | 44% |
| Léa Le Coquil | 10/10 | 1002 days | 41% |
| Angela Laloli | 10/10 | 1002 days | 41% |
| Bevan Haswell | 10/10 | 1002 days | 41% |
| Lisa | 10/10 | 1002 days | 41% |
| Mark | 10/10 | 1033 days | 38% |
| Euge y Luz | 10/10 | 1064 days | 35% |
| April REN | 10/10 | 1975 days | 0% |
Adjustments
Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.
Sample Size Adjustment
No Adjustment
A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Western Springs Spot experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
Recent Reviews Adjustment
-0.30% Adjustment
There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received any reviews within the last 104 days. However the Western Springs Spot experience does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.
In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.
The Western Springs Spot experience has been adjusted for 24 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.
| Days | Adjustment |
|---|---|
| … | … |
| 21 | -0.26% |
| 22 | -0.27% |
| 23 | -0.29% |
| 24 | -0.30% |
| 25 | -0.31% |
| 26 | -0.32% |
| 27 | -0.34% |
| … | … |
Balancing Adjustment
0.08% Adjustment
Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.
You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.
We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.
Final Ranking Score
99%
The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.