Ranking Score Explained

G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Western Springs Spot.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Western Springs Spot

Valid Reviews

80 Valid Reviews

The Western Springs Spot experience has a total of 81 reviews. There are 80 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 80 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 75
94%
9/10 5
6%
8/10 0
0%
7/10 0
0%
6/10 0
0%
5/10 0
0%
4/10 0
0%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 0
0%

99.37% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Western Springs Spot valid reviews is 99.37% and is based on 79 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Weighted Average

99.33%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Ciara 10/10 19 days 100%
Daliah El Kady 10/10 50 days 100%
Thaïs Van Burm 10/10 50 days 100%
Nadine Lutherborrow 10/10 50 days 100%
Ronja Reichenbacher 10/10 78 days 100%
Theo Martial 10/10 78 days 100%
Rose Boogaard 10/10 78 days 100%
Ann-Kristin Walek 10/10 109 days 99%
Henrike Grotsch 10/10 140 days 99%
Johann Münkner 10/10 140 days 99%
Claude Prigent 10/10 201 days 98%
Beccy 9/10 201 days 97%
Caleb 10/10 201 days 98%
Angèle Aveline 10/10 201 days 98%
Liss 10/10 231 days 97%
Carola Toppe 10/10 323 days 94%
Reinhild 10/10 384 days 91%
Jade Dufour 9/10 384 days 90%
Hubert Skudlik 10/10 384 days 91%
Lynn Dumoulin 10/10 384 days 91%
Michael Szott 9/10 415 days 89%
Mady Roosen 10/10 443 days 88%
Kerstin Wilmans 10/10 443 days 88%
OB 10/10 443 days 88%
Julie 10/10 443 days 88%
Di Sloan 10/10 443 days 88%
Jamie.wills@yahoo.co.uk 10/10 443 days 88%
David Weyel 10/10 443 days 88%
Holly 10/10 474 days 87%
Günter Handler 10/10 474 days 87%
Francois Petit 10/10 474 days 87%
Ruth Bosustow 10/10 474 days 87%
Emily 10/10 474 days 87%
Elisabeth Schraml 10/10 474 days 87%
Marta 10/10 505 days 85%
Jonathan Nelson 10/10 505 days 85%
Henry 10/10 505 days 85%
Verena Schöser 10/10 505 days 85%
Boy 10/10 535 days 83%
Karl-Friedrich Haenel 10/10 535 days 83%
Alice 10/10 535 days 83%
Hanna 10/10 535 days 83%
Matthias 10/10 535 days 83%
Stacey O 10/10 596 days 79%
Eva Holliwell 10/10 627 days 76%
Wouter 9/10 627 days 76%
Twinnz 10/10 688 days 72%
Rejane Noel 10/10 688 days 72%
Kornel Tornyos 10/10 719 days 69%
Florencia 10/10 719 days 69%
Tom Williams 10/10 719 days 69%
Barnabas Csoka 10/10 719 days 69%
Jelco 10/10 749 days 66%
Ondrej Visa 10/10 749 days 66%
TJ 10/10 749 days 66%
Caron 10/10 780 days 64%
Tristan Temme 10/10 780 days 64%
Niels 10/10 780 days 64%
Conny 10/10 780 days 64%
Alexander Kaulartz 10/10 780 days 64%
Andreas Meyer 10/10 780 days 64%
Franz Kestler 10/10 780 days 64%
Simone 10/10 809 days 61%
Lonneke van Westenbrugge 10/10 809 days 61%
Sarah Mongbo 10/10 809 days 61%
Matt 10/10 901 days 51%
Joe 10/10 932 days 48%
Lot 9/10 932 days 47%
Landon Brown 10/10 932 days 48%
Nolwenn 10/10 932 days 48%
Sean 10/10 932 days 48%
Sharon Hao 10/10 932 days 48%
Eva-Marie 10/10 932 days 48%
Léa Le Coquil 10/10 962 days 45%
Angela Laloli 10/10 962 days 45%
Bevan Haswell 10/10 962 days 45%
Lisa 10/10 962 days 45%
Mark 10/10 993 days 42%
Euge y Luz 10/10 1024 days 39%
April REN 10/10 1935 days 0%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Western Springs Spot does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

0.06% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled customers are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

99%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.