Ranking Score Explained

Hi there, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Next Campers.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Nick Morrison's avatar

Nick Morrison

Rankers owner

Next Campers

Valid Reviews

57 Valid Reviews

The Next Campers experience has a total of 58 reviews. There are 57 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 57 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 52
9/10 4
8/10 1
7/10 0
6/10 0
5/10 0
4/10 0
3/10 0
2/10 0
1/10 0

98.95% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Next Campers valid reviews is 98.95% and is based on 57 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Weighted Average


Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Ellie Richards 10/10 169 days 100%
Stephanie Saxton 10/10 169 days 100%
Brad Nichols 10/10 200 days 98%
Ariane Denham 10/10 200 days 98%
Birgit Küchler 10/10 200 days 98%
Emilie Gios 10/10 259 days 93%
Katarina Marsalekova 10/10 259 days 93%
Lu Matthews 10/10 259 days 93%
Katherine St Gelais 10/10 290 days 90%
Gareth Jones 9/10 290 days 90%
Tui McCaughey 10/10 320 days 86%
Charlie 10/10 351 days 83%
Alejandro 10/10 351 days 83%
Krissi 10/10 351 days 83%
Martin 10/10 381 days 79%
Mariah 10/10 473 days 64%
Matt Murray 10/10 565 days 47%
Linda Hay 10/10 565 days 47%
florent marmounier 10/10 565 days 47%
hilde schweitzer 10/10 565 days 47%
Andreas Seidner 10/10 565 days 47%
Franziska Ludwig 10/10 565 days 47%
Alexis Sherman 10/10 594 days 41%
joyce teo 10/10 594 days 41%
Julie Tu 10/10 594 days 41%
harriette Wight 10/10 594 days 41%
Linda Fairley 10/10 594 days 41%
Holly and Chris 10/10 594 days 41%
Chris Evans 10/10 625 days 36%
Silvia Jimenez 10/10 625 days 36%
Sarah 10/10 625 days 36%
James Treffor 10/10 625 days 36%
Jennifer 10/10 625 days 36%
Kristin 10/10 625 days 36%
Franziska 10/10 625 days 36%
Anna Pullin 10/10 625 days 36%
Stephan Kinast 10/10 656 days 30%
Katherine St Gelais 10/10 656 days 30%
Gio 10/10 656 days 30%
Johanna Ott 10/10 656 days 30%
Jorge Gonzales 10/10 656 days 30%
Chantal 10/10 656 days 30%
Arne Driessen 9/10 656 days 30%
Bryan Mills 10/10 686 days 26%
Henrietta Mann 9/10 686 days 26%
Dayna 10/10 686 days 26%
Julie Bowers 10/10 686 days 26%
javier tamayo 8/10 686 days 24%
Peter Prince 10/10 686 days 26%
Michael Pach 10/10 686 days 26%
Max & Nicole 10/10 717 days 21%
AlexNZ 10/10 717 days 21%
Allie Dunn 9/10 747 days 17%
Ellie 10/10 747 days 17%
Peter Scott 10/10 839 days 7%
Maria 10/10 931 days 0%
Jekabs 10/10 931 days 0%


Several adjustments to the weighted average are added to improve relevancy and credibility. These adjustments apply equally to all experiences that meet the criteria.

Sample Size Adjustment

No Adjustment

A reasonable number of reviews are necessary in order for the average to be credible and for an experience to take a prime position within the ranking tables. As such, experiences with only a few reviews have a moderated score. This does not mean that the experience or the reviews can't be trusted. The Next Campers experience has plenty of reviews and does not meet the criteria for any adjustment.

Recent Reviews Adjustment

-5.38% Adjustment

Recent reviews reflect the experience as it currently operates. This means it's important to get fresh reviews. Some experiences discovered they could get a few good reviews and then, resting on their laurels, discourage any further reviews. This adjustment stimulates experiences to be positively involved in the review generating process and discourages them from manipulating the ranking system in this manner.

What constitutes a recent review is based on the how old it is, what type of experience it is applied to and and what time of year it currently is. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, what is considered recent is dynamically adjusted throughout the year.

There may be an adjustment if this experience hasn't received enough reviews within the last 77 days. The Next Campers experience has 0 recent rankings. Adjustments are according to the following table:

Recent Reviews Adjustment
0 -3.00%
1 -2.83%
2 -2.33%
3 -1.50%
4 -0.67%
5 -0.17%
6 -0.00%

In addition, an experience's ranking score may be adjusted for each day there is no new ranking. After 1 day the adjustment comes into effect. The maximum number of days that can be adjusted for is 200 days. Due to the seasonal nature of many businesses, this adjustment is applied dynamically throughout the year.

The Next Campers experience has been adjusted for 161 days. Adjustments are according to the following table.

Days Adjustment
158 -2.34%
159 -2.35%
160 -2.37%
161 -2.38%
162 -2.40%
163 -2.41%
164 -2.43%

Final Ranking Score


The final ranking score once adjustments and rounding has been applied. This value is cached and recalculated each day. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz.