Ranking Score Explained

G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Lake Rotomanu, New Plymouth.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Lake Rotomanu, New Plymouth

Valid Reviews

52 Valid Reviews

The Lake Rotomanu, New Plymouth experience has a total of 53 reviews. There are 52 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 52 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 16
31%
9/10 16
31%
8/10 7
13%
7/10 3
6%
6/10 3
6%
5/10 3
6%
4/10 1
2%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 3
6%

80.96% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Lake Rotomanu, New Plymouth valid reviews is 80.96% and is based on 52 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Weighted Average

85.95%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
Cn 6/10 126 days 88%
Lotto 10/10 218 days 100%
Kenai 8/10 279 days 96%
Eline 9/10 279 days 97%
Morgane 6/10 338 days 82%
Mladen Savov 10/10 338 days 96%
Ike 5/10 369 days 72%
Simon 9/10 430 days 91%
Milly Struthers 5/10 460 days 68%
Beth 10/10 460 days 90%
Tīwai 9/10 522 days 86%
LuxuryVanDweller 10/10 522 days 87%
Martin 9/10 552 days 84%
can24camp 7/10 644 days 73%
Daph' 10/10 673 days 76%
Andrew 10/10 673 days 76%
Phil K 5/10 673 days 57%
Shelly the Van 10/10 704 days 73%
laura 10/10 704 days 73%
Maren 9/10 735 days 70%
Diana Antunez 9/10 796 days 64%
Marie Perret 9/10 796 days 64%
Apirera 10/10 857 days 59%
Valentin 10/10 857 days 59%
Marine 7/10 857 days 55%
Laura 8/10 918 days 52%
@saltyskin 10/10 918 days 53%
Genevieve 8/10 949 days 48%
Finn 9/10 949 days 49%
Ruohan Li 10/10 979 days 46%
sarah penney 10/10 979 days 46%
Louisa Runge 9/10 1038 days 40%
Linc 10/10 1191 days 28%
Drew 8/10 1283 days 21%
George 4/10 1375 days 10%
Ko 6/10 1375 days 13%
Wayne 8/10 1375 days 15%
Melanie 7/10 1618 days 6%
Bex 9/10 1830 days 4%
Boardwalk Blss 9/10 1983 days 3%
Wanderingphoenix 9/10 1983 days 3%
Mathieu 1/10 2105 days 0%
Gracjan 1/10 2134 days 0%
Dave Kitson 10/10 2165 days 3%
Eva Muselaers 9/10 2165 days 3%
Luna 8/10 2165 days 3%
Tassie Travellers 9/10 2226 days 3%
Dona Shiell 8/10 2410 days 2%
Julie 1/10 2440 days 0%
Andy and Julia 9/10 2470 days 2%
Elad 10/10 2471 days 2%
Keybags 9/10 2499 days 2%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Lake Rotomanu, New Plymouth does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

1.64% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

88%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.