G'day, thanks for your interest in how we calculate an experience's ranking score. It's at the core of Rankers so I'm pleased you're curious.

The ranking score percentage is used to compare and sort experiences in ranking tables. It is not necessarily a direct measurement of the quality of a particular experience as rated by its customers. I've found it a useful tool to allow me to find the best experiences with confidence. But I've also found it important to read the customer reviews before making any final judgements!

We calculate an experience's ranking score using a multi-factor data model instead of a raw data average (mean). This model takes into account several important questions. For instance - is there a trusted body of reviews? What is the age of a review and is the review from a credible source?

Below you'll find details around some of the important factors that went into calculating the ranking score for Lake Rotomanu, New Plymouth.

If you have any questions or comments about our ranking score calculation please get in touch at info@rankers.co.nz. We don't believe this is perfect or complete so we're always interested in ways we might make improvements.

Cymen Crick's avatar

Cymen Crick

Rankers Owner

Lake Rotomanu, New Plymouth

Valid Reviews

54 Valid Reviews

The Lake Rotomanu, New Plymouth experience has a total of 55 reviews. There are 54 valid reviews that are included when calculating the ranking score and 1 invalid review that are excluded from the calculation. Reviews can be excluded only when a reviewer is not verified or after an investigation by our team determines the reviewer is not genuine.

Below is the distribution of ratings for the 54 valid reviews:

Rating Count Percentage
10/10 16
30%
9/10 16
30%
8/10 8
15%
7/10 3
6%
6/10 4
7%
5/10 3
6%
4/10 1
2%
3/10 0
0%
2/10 0
0%
1/10 3
6%

80.56% Average

The raw data average (mean) for all the Lake Rotomanu, New Plymouth valid reviews is 80.56% and is based on 54 valid reviews. This value is not used to calculate the ranking score and it only provided here as a comparison to the weighted average.

Weighted Average

84.18%

Rankers calculates a weighted mean as a base average on which we can improve. Individual review's ratings are given a weight based on several factors. The weight of a review determines the overall impact it'll have on the final weighted average.

Recent reviews have more weight as they are more relevant and reflect the experience as it currently operates. Over time reviews become less relevant and loose their impact on the ranking score.

Low rating reviews carry slightly less weight. This dampens the effect of very low ratings for every experience across the board. This is especially important when the experience has few reviews overall and a single negative rating can grossly mischaracterise an experience. Consistent poor reviews will still result in the experience receiving a comparitively low ranking score.

Credible sources provide reviews that can be trusted. If we have verified a reviewer is genuine via a face-to-face meeting then the review carries additional weight.

Reviewer Rating Age Relative Weight
FF 6/10 19 days 88%
Jacob 8/10 111 days 100%
Cn 6/10 323 days 83%
Lotto 10/10 415 days 93%
Kenai 8/10 476 days 88%
Eline 9/10 476 days 88%
Morgane 6/10 535 days 74%
Mladen Savov 10/10 535 days 86%
Ike 5/10 566 days 63%
Simon 9/10 627 days 79%
Milly Struthers 5/10 657 days 58%
Beth 10/10 657 days 77%
Tīwai 9/10 719 days 71%
LuxuryVanDweller 10/10 719 days 72%
Martin 9/10 749 days 69%
can24camp 7/10 841 days 56%
Daph' 10/10 870 days 58%
Andrew 10/10 870 days 58%
Phil K 5/10 870 days 44%
Shelly the Van 10/10 901 days 55%
laura 10/10 901 days 55%
Maren 9/10 932 days 51%
Diana Antunez 9/10 993 days 44%
Marie Perret 9/10 993 days 44%
Apirera 10/10 1054 days 39%
Valentin 10/10 1054 days 39%
Marine 7/10 1054 days 36%
Laura 8/10 1115 days 33%
@saltyskin 10/10 1115 days 34%
Genevieve 8/10 1146 days 31%
Finn 9/10 1146 days 31%
Ruohan Li 10/10 1176 days 29%
sarah penney 10/10 1176 days 29%
Louisa Runge 9/10 1235 days 24%
Linc 10/10 1388 days 15%
Drew 8/10 1480 days 11%
George 4/10 1572 days 4%
Ko 6/10 1572 days 6%
Wayne 8/10 1572 days 7%
Melanie 7/10 1815 days 3%
Bex 9/10 2027 days 3%
Boardwalk Blss 9/10 2180 days 3%
Wanderingphoenix 9/10 2180 days 3%
Mathieu 1/10 2302 days 0%
Gracjan 1/10 2331 days 0%
Dave Kitson 10/10 2362 days 3%
Eva Muselaers 9/10 2362 days 3%
Luna 8/10 2362 days 3%
Tassie Travellers 9/10 2423 days 3%
Dona Shiell 8/10 2607 days 2%
Julie 1/10 2637 days 0%
Andy and Julia 9/10 2667 days 2%
Elad 10/10 2668 days 2%
Keybags 9/10 2696 days 2%

Adjustments

No Adjustment

Several adjustments to the weighted average may be added to improve relevancy and credibility. Lake Rotomanu, New Plymouth does not meet the criteria for any of these adjustments to apply.

Balancing Adjustment

1.99% Adjustment

Every experience's review score is adjusted to balance out the disproportional number of negative reviews that are contributed.

You won't be surprised to learn that disgruntled folk are more likely to leave a review than happy ones. They are motivated to share their experience and warn others. We consider this a good thing and it's why reading the reviews is important. However we've learned it can misrepresent the experience in a more overall sense.

We apply a balancing adjustment to counteract this effect and ensure the ranking score is a more fair representation of the experience. This adjustment is applied equally to all experiences.

Final Ranking Score

86%

The final ranking score once any adjustments, ratings, and rounding has been applied. This value is recalculated each day and a short rolling average is applied. Therefore it may not be precisely accurate based on the other values presented.